What’s next for Windows 10 and Windows Server quality updates

Published Aug 16 2018 10:45 AM 79.6K Views
Microsoft

Today I’m excited to share that we’ll be bringing a new design for quality updates to the next major versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server, coming later this year. This design creates a compact update package for easier and faster deployment.

Windows 10 quality updates are cumulative, containing all previously released fixes to ensure consistency and simplicity, and are released monthly. As Mike Benson noted in his post last month on “Windows 10 quality updates explained & the end of delta updates,” we are continuing to work to reduce the impact of cumulative update sizes and reduce complexity for IT administrators. That is why, beginning February 12, 2019, Microsoft will end its practice of creating delta updates for all versions of Windows 10.

For down-level supported versions of Windows 10, Microsoft will continue to provide express updates in addition to a full update (also referred to as a latest cumulative update, or LCU) each month. Starting with the next major version of Windows 10 and Windows Server; however, there will be only one quality update type—and it will be smaller in size, redistributable, and simpler to manage. This new, single update approach offers benefits over the three existing update types (full, delta, and express):

  • Organizations that get full updates from Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or from the Microsoft Update Catalog will seamlessly save network bandwidth thanks to the smaller size of the update.
  • Organizations that have been using delta updates to manage the size of quality updates will no longer have to monitor the update status and history of their devices to determine which devices are eligible for delta updates.
  • Since this new quality update package will be redistributable, organizations that utilize express updates via WSUS, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM), or a third-party management solution that supports express updates will experience enormous savings in network bandwidth and cache size on their distribution points or update servers. In addition, devices with the next major version of Windows 10 will be 40% more efficient* while updating since there will be no behind-the-scenes computing of the optimal differentials required to download express updates.

*40% improvement in device memory utilization as compared to Express updates (Reference set measurement)

whats-next-for-quality-updates_01.png

whats-next-for-quality-updates_02.png

**Express update size as depicted is the best-case scenario with the assumption that the device stays up-to-date each month.

Quality updates packaged using this new design will be distributed over Windows Update (WU) and WSUS in a cabinet (.cab) file and available as downloadable Update Standalone Installer (.msu) files from the Microsoft Update Catalog. Devices managed by Microsoft Intune, and third-party mobile device management (MDM) solutions, as well as on-premises management solutions that get updates from WSUS or the Microsoft Update Catalog, will all have access to this new quality update design.

Microsoft will use the same update package design to deliver quality updates to devices connected directly to Windows Update. Today, if these devices are running a currently supported version of Windows 10, they receive applicable quality updates as full updates (LCU) with feature updates and successive monthly quality updates using express updates. Devices connected directly to Windows Update that are running the next major version of Windows 10 (and future versions) will benefit from the new small update size whether they are installing applicable quality updates with a feature update or installing a monthly quality update at any time.

This change in approach applies to all monthly quality update releases, i.e. “B” releases, out-of-band releases, and “C” and “D” releases. If you want to learn more about monthly quality update releases, see John Wilcox’s post on the Windows 10 update servicing cadence.

For more information on optimizing update bandwidth, see Optimize Windows 10 update delivery. To learn more about Windows as a service, visit the Windows as a service page on the Windows IT Pro Center.

 

31 Comments
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-229461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWhat%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-229461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EToday%20I%E2%80%99m%20excited%20to%20share%20that%20we%E2%80%99ll%20be%20bringing%20a%20new%20design%20for%20quality%20updates%20to%20the%20next%20major%20versions%20of%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%2C%20coming%20later%20this%20year.%20This%20design%20creates%20a%20compact%20update%20package%20for%20easier%20and%20faster%20deployment.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EWindows%2010%20quality%20updates%20are%20cumulative%2C%20containing%20all%20previously%20released%20fixes%20to%20ensure%20consistency%20and%20simplicity%2C%20and%20are%20released%20monthly.%20As%20Mike%20Benson%20noted%20in%20his%20post%20last%20month%20on%20%E2%80%9C%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FWindows-IT-Pro-Blog%2FWindows-10-quality-updates-explained-amp-the-end-of-delta%2Fba-p%2F214426%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3EWindows%2010%20quality%20updates%20explained%20%26amp%3B%20the%20end%20of%20delta%20updates%3C%2FA%3E%2C%E2%80%9D%20we%20are%20continuing%20to%20work%20to%20reduce%20the%20impact%20of%20cumulative%20update%20sizes%20and%20reduce%20complexity%20for%20IT%20administrators.%20That%20is%20why%2C%20beginning%20February%2012%2C%202019%2C%20Microsoft%20will%20end%20its%20practice%20of%20creating%20delta%20updates%20for%20all%20versions%20of%20Windows%2010.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EFor%20down-level%20supported%20versions%20of%20Windows%2010%2C%20Microsoft%20will%20continue%20to%20provide%20express%20updates%20in%20addition%20to%20a%20full%20update%20(also%20referred%20to%20as%20a%20latest%20cumulative%20update%2C%20or%20LCU)%20each%20month.%20Starting%20with%20the%20next%20major%20version%20of%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%3B%20however%2C%20there%20will%20be%20only%20one%20quality%20update%20type%E2%80%94and%20it%20will%20be%20smaller%20in%20size%2C%20redistributable%2C%20and%20simpler%20to%20manage.%20This%20new%2C%20single%20update%20approach%20offers%20benefits%20over%20the%20three%20existing%20update%20types%20(full%2C%20delta%2C%20and%20express)%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CUL%3E%0A%3CLI%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A%208px%3B%20margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EOrganizations%20that%20get%20full%20updates%20from%20Windows%20Server%20Update%20Services%20(WSUS)%20or%20from%20the%20Microsoft%20Update%20Catalog%20will%20seamlessly%20save%20network%20bandwidth%20thanks%20to%20the%20smaller%20size%20of%20the%20update.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A%208px%3B%22%3EOrganizations%20that%20have%20been%20using%20delta%20updates%20to%20manage%20the%20size%20of%20quality%20updates%20will%20no%20longer%20have%20to%20monitor%20the%20update%20status%20and%20history%20of%20their%20devices%20to%20determine%20which%20devices%20are%20eligible%20for%20delta%20updates.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A%208px%3B%22%3ESince%20this%20new%20quality%20update%20package%20will%20be%20redistributable%2C%20organizations%20that%20utilize%20express%20updates%20via%20WSUS%2C%20System%20Center%20Configuration%20Manager%20(SCCM)%2C%20or%20a%20third-party%20management%20solution%20that%20supports%20express%20updates%20will%20experience%20enormous%20savings%20in%20network%20bandwidth%20and%20cache%20size%20on%20their%20distribution%20points%20or%20update%20servers.%20In%20addition%2C%20devices%20with%20the%20next%20major%20version%20of%20Windows%2010%20will%20be%2040%25%20more%20efficient*%20while%20updating%20since%20there%20will%20be%20no%20behind-the-scenes%20computing%20of%20the%20optimal%20differentials%20required%20to%20download%20express%20updates.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3C%2FUL%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%20font-family%3A%20'Segoe%20UI'%2C%20Segoe%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20Geneva%2C%20sans-serif%3B%20font-size%3A%2014px%3B%20font-weight%3A%20400%3B%20color%3A%20%23333333%3B%22%3E*40%25%20improvement%20in%20device%20memory%20utilization%20as%20compared%20to%20Express%20updates%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-hardware%2Ftest%2Fwpt%2Fwpa-reference-set%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EReference%20set%3C%2FA%3E%20measurement)%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20497px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F39805i25CFCB0EC5BA6567%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22whats-next-for-quality-updates_01.png%22%20title%3D%22whats-next-for-quality-updates_01.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20575px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F39806i5DFEAB897AC2B561%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22whats-next-for-quality-updates_02.png%22%20title%3D%22whats-next-for-quality-updates_02.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%20font-family%3A%20'Segoe%20UI'%2C%20Segoe%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20Geneva%2C%20sans-serif%3B%20font-size%3A%2014px%3B%20font-weight%3A%20400%3B%20color%3A%20%23333333%3B%22%3E**Express%20update%20size%20as%20depicted%20is%20the%20best-case%20scenario%20with%20the%20assumption%20that%20the%20device%20stays%20up-to-date%20each%20month.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EQuality%20updates%20packaged%20using%20this%20new%20design%20will%20be%20distributed%20over%20Windows%20Update%20(WU)%20and%20WSUS%20in%20a%20cabinet%20(.cab)%20file%20and%20available%20as%20downloadable%20Update%20Standalone%20Installer%20(.msu)%20files%20from%20the%20Microsoft%20Update%20Catalog.%20Devices%20managed%20by%20Microsoft%20Intune%2C%20and%20third-party%20mobile%20device%20management%20(MDM)%20solutions%2C%20as%20well%20as%20on-premises%20management%20solutions%20that%20get%20updates%20from%20WSUS%20or%20the%20Microsoft%20Update%20Catalog%2C%20will%20all%20have%20access%20to%20this%20new%20quality%20update%20design.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EMicrosoft%20will%20use%20the%20same%20update%20package%20design%20to%20deliver%20quality%20updates%20to%20devices%20connected%20directly%20to%20Windows%20Update.%20Today%2C%20if%20these%20devices%20are%20running%20a%20currently%20supported%20version%20of%20Windows%2010%2C%20they%20receive%20applicable%20quality%20updates%20as%20full%20updates%20(LCU)%20with%20feature%20updates%20and%20successive%20monthly%20quality%20updates%20using%20express%20updates.%20Devices%20connected%20directly%20to%20Windows%20Update%20that%20are%20running%20the%20next%20major%20version%20of%20Windows%2010%20(and%20future%20versions)%20will%20benefit%20from%20the%20new%20small%20update%20size%20whether%20they%20are%20installing%20applicable%20quality%20updates%20with%20a%20feature%20update%20or%20installing%20a%20monthly%20quality%20update%20at%20any%20time.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EThis%20change%20in%20approach%20applies%20to%20all%20monthly%20quality%20update%20releases%2C%20i.e.%20%E2%80%9CB%E2%80%9D%20releases%2C%20out-of-band%20releases%2C%20and%20%E2%80%9CC%E2%80%9D%20and%20%E2%80%9CD%E2%80%9D%20releases.%20If%20you%20want%20to%20learn%20more%20about%20monthly%20quality%20update%20releases%2C%20see%20John%20Wilcox%E2%80%99s%20post%20on%20the%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FWindows-IT-Pro-Blog%2FWindows-10-update-servicing-cadence%2Fba-p%2F222376%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3EWindows%2010%20update%20servicing%20cadence%3C%2FA%3E.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3EFor%20more%20information%20on%20optimizing%20update%20bandwidth%2C%20see%20%3CU%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows%2Fdeployment%2Fupdate%2Fwaas-optimize-windows-10-updates%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EOptimize%20Windows%2010%20update%20delivery%3C%2FA%3E.%3C%2FU%3E%20To%20learn%20more%20about%20Windows%20as%20a%20service%2C%20visit%20the%20%3CU%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fitpro%2Fwindows-10%2Fwindows-as-a-service%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EWindows%20as%20a%20service%20page%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FU%3E%20on%20the%20Windows%20IT%20Pro%20Center.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20style%3D%22margin-top%3A%2020px%3B%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-TEASER%20id%3D%22lingo-teaser-229461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EGet%20insight%20into%20the%20single%2C%20compact%2C%20and%20versatile%20design%20coming%20to%20quality%20updates%20for%20Windows%2010%20later%20this%20year.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-TEASER%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-229461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EServicing%20and%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-366800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-366800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EGreat%20job%2C%20rethinking%20the%20update%20package%20format%20and%20logic.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhile%20reading%20Mike's%20lines%20about%20the%20inner%20working%2C%20I%20wonder%20about%20the%20need%20to%20place%20reverse%20deltas%20into%20the%20small%20updates.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'd%20think%20it%20might%20be%20more%20efficient%20to%20calculate%20the%20reverse%20on%20the%20fly%20while%20applying%20a%20forward%20delta.%20If%20local%20disk%20space%20is%20not%20a%20concern%20(is%20it%20nowadays%3F)%2C%20but%20processor%20and%20memory%20use%20is%2C%20%22calculating%22%20the%20reverse%20might%20be%20as%20easy%20as%20just%20saving%20(or%20keeping)%20the%20original%20file%20in%20the%20component%20store.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHowever%2C%20if%20the%20compression%20algorithm%20in%20the%20update%20packages%20does%20use%20some%20XOR-logic%20or%20similar%2C%20so%20that%20reverse%20%2B%20forward%20deltas%20do%20not%20take%20much%20more%20space%20than%20forward%20deltas%20only%2C%20you%20have%20done%20a%20really%20great%20job.%20Are%20there%20any%20details%20about%20that%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-352668%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-352668%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F286076%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40djello%3C%2FA%3E%2C%26nbsp%3BMike%20Benson%20made%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FWindows-IT-Pro-Blog%2FWhat-s-next-for-Windows-10-and-Windows-Server-quality-updates%2Fbc-p%2F234768%2Fhighlight%2Ftrue%23M218%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%3Ea%20post%20earlier%20in%20this%20thread%3C%2FA%3E%20saying%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3ETo%20make%20this%20change%2C%20there%20were%20modifications%20needed%20in%20both%20the%20package%20format%20itself%2C%20and%20in%20the%20update%20stack%20on%20the%20client.%26nbsp%3B%20Making%20those%20types%20of%20changes%20to%20older%20versions%20of%20the%20OS%20would%20be%20risky%20(the%20update%20stack%20is%20absolutely%20critical).%26nbsp%3B%20With%20a%20new%20version%20of%20the%20OS%20we%20have%20many%20months%20of%20both%20internal%20testing%20as%20well%20as%20Windows%20Insider%20previews%20that%20we%20can%20use%20to%20validate%20the%20changes%20at%20scale%20and%20reduce%20risk.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3ESo%20no%2C%20it%20doesn't%20sound%20like%20it%20will%20be%20coming%20to%20Server%202016%2C%20only%20Server%202019.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-352497%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-352497%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWill%20this%20be%20available%20for%20all%20versions%20of%20Server%202016%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-325804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-325804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F169124%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nathan%20Ziehnert%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F80266%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ryan%20Steele%3C%2FA%3E%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ECorruption%20repair%20requires%20access%20to%20Windows%20Update%20or%20a%20Windows%20Repair%20Source.%20For%20an%20environment%20with%20blocked%20access%20to%20Windows%20Update%2C%20you%20can%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fwindows-hardware%2Fmanufacture%2Fdesktop%2Fconfigure-a-windows-repair-source%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Econfigure%20a%20Windows%20Repair%20Source%3C%2FA%3E%20to%20use%20within%20your%20network.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-325082%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-325082%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F80266%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ryan%20Steele%3C%2FA%3E-%20(facepalm)%20thank%20you.%20I%20guess%20I%20wasn't%20assuming%20that%20the%20updates%20were%20relying%20on%20data%20stored%20locally%20but%20that%20process%20makes%20much%20more%20sense%20now.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-324755%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-324755%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F169124%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nathan%20Ziehnert%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20I%20think%20I%20see%20your%20misunderstanding.%20You%20may%20be%20under%20the%20impression%20that%20the%20Smaller%20Updates%20contain%20the%20reverse%20differentials%20for%20the%20previous%20months'%20quality%20updates%2C%20but%20this%20is%20not%20the%20case.%20Each%20update%20contains%20only%20two%20sets%20of%20deltas%3A%20the%20ones%20to%20get%20from%20RTM%20to%20that%20update%2C%20and%20the%20ones%20to%20get%20from%20that%20update%20back%20to%20RTM.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELet's%20say%20you%20installed%20Windows%2010%201809%20in%20September%2C%20then%20you%20installed%20the%202018-10%20Cumulative%20Update%20in%20October.%20That%20update%20contains%20the%20deltas%20to%20get%20from%20RTM%20to%202018-10%2C%26nbsp%3Bas%20well%20as%20the%20deltas%20to%20get%20from%202018-10%20back%20to%20RTM.%20Then%20you%20installed%20the%202018-11%20Cumulative%20Update%20in%20November.%20It%20contains%20the%20deltas%20to%20get%20from%20RTM%20to%202018-11%20and%20the%20deltas%20to%20get%20from%202018-11%20back%20to%20RTM.%20Windows%20uses%20the%20deltas%26nbsp%3B%3CSTRONG%3Eit%20already%20has%20from%20the%20previous%20update%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20to%20get%20from%202018-10%20to%20RTM%2C%20the%20it%20uses%20the%20new%20deltas%20it%20just%20downloaded%20to%20get%20from%20RTM%20to%202018-11.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-324634%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-324634%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F80266%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ryan%20Steele%3C%2FA%3E%20-%20I%20agree%20that%20they%20are%20slightly%20larger%20than%20the%20expected%20data%20transfer%20of%20express%20updates%2C%20but%20this%20is%20inclusive%20of%20everything%20(one%20150-300MB%20update%20being%20cumulative%20for%20all%20revisions%20of%20an%20OS)%20which%20is%20significantly%20smaller%20than%20the%20all%20in%20storage%20cost%20of%20express%20updates%20(5-6GB%20on%20the%20WSUS%20server).%20Fundamentally%20something%20is%20very%20different%20between%20how%20they%20were%20packaged%20in%20Express%20vs%20how%20they%20are%20now%20being%20packaged.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-324561%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-324561%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F169124%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nathan%20Ziehnert%3C%2FA%3E%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20I%20understand%20your%20first%20question%20correctly%2C%20you%20are%20wondering%20how%20what%20Mike%20calls%20the%20%22Smaller%20Update%22%20could%20be%20smaller%20than%20the%20%22Express%20Update%22.%20As%20far%20as%20the%20size%20of%20the%20content%20delivered%20to%20each%20client%20goes%2C%20I%20don't%20believe%20that%20Microsoft%20is%20claiming%26nbsp%3Bthese%20updates%20to%20be%20smaller.%20In%20fact%2C%20if%20you%20look%20at%20the%20%22Update%20size%22%20graph%2C%20the%20bar%20for%20the%20new%20Quality%20Update%20is%20slightly%20taller%20than%20the%20bar%20for%20the%20Express%20Update.%20It%20sounds%20like%20the%20real%20benefits%20comes%20from%20the%20greatly%20reduced%20amount%20of%20data%20that%20needs%20to%20be%20transferred%20to%20and%20stored%20on%20the%20update%20servers%2C%20and%20the%20reduction%20in%20processing%20on%20the%20client.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20far%20as%20whether%20blocking%20access%20to%20Windows%20Update%20with%20a%20GPO%20would%20affect%20automatic%20corruption%20repair%2C%20I'd%20be%20interested%20to%20hear%20the%20answer%20to%20that%20as%20well.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-323743%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-323743%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20the%20first%20of%20these%20small%20updates%20last%20Wednesday.%20123%20MB%20instead%20of%201%20GB!%20It%20felt%20good.%20%3Asmiling_face_with_smiling_eyes%3A%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-321648%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-321648%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAlso%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F157438%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mike%20Benson%3C%2FA%3E%20%2F%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F176797%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Maliha%20Qureshi%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20whitepaper%20that%20describes%20this%20new%20update%20process%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows%2Fdeployment%2Fupdate%2Fpsfxwhitepaper%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows%2Fdeployment%2Fupdate%2Fpsfxwhitepaper%3C%2FA%3E)%20describes%20the%20automatic%20repair%20process%20being%20potentially%20reliant%20on%20Windows%20Update%20-%20is%20this%20true%3F%20Will%20this%20automatic%20repair%20process%20be%20affected%20by%20any%20group%20policies%20blocking%20access%20to%20Windows%20Update%20as%20a%20source%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20corruption%20is%20detected%20during%20update%20operations%2C%20automatic%20corruption%20repair%20will%20start%20as%20usual%20and%20use%20the%20Baseless%20Patch%20Storage%20File%20%3CSTRONG%3Epublished%20to%20Windows%20Update%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20for%20each%20update%20to%20fix%20corrupted%20manifests%2C%20binary%20differentials%2C%20or%20hydrated%20or%20full%20files.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-321446%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-321446%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Mike%2FMaliha%20-%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHoping%20you%20can%20shed%20a%20little%20more%20light%20on%20how%20Microsoft%20is%20achieving%20the%20space%20savings%20in%20the%20%22small%22%20updates.%20I%20understand%20that%20you're%20only%20including%20the%20forward%20differentials%20for%20RTM%20-%26gt%3B%20Target%20version%20(rather%20than%20forward%20differentials%20for%205%20versions%20%2B%20RTM)%2C%20but%20you're%20also%20including%20the%20reverse%20differentials%20for%20each%20version%20of%20the%20file%20back%20to%20RTM%20-%20and%20those%20have%20to%20be%20non-zero%20sized%20as%20well%2C%20right%3F%20The%20system%20still%20has%20to%20know%20how%20to%20convert%20what%20it%20has%20to%20RTM%20and%20then%20to%20target%20for%20hydration%2C%20or%20am%20I%20misunderstanding%20a%20fundamental%20concept%20here%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-263634%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-263634%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%20everyone%2C%20here%20are%20some%20answers%20to%20the%20most%20recent%20questions.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMat%20Calvin%20-%20WSUS%20from%20Server%202012r2%20is%20supported%20by%20the%20new%20smaller%20cumulative%20updates%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EEsteban%20-%20Unfortunately%20I'm%20not%20enough%20of%20a%20WSUS%20expert%20to%20know%20the%20answer%20to%20that%20question.%26nbsp%3B%20I'd%20recommend%20either%20reaching%20out%20to%20your%20account%20manager%2C%20or%20going%20to%20a%20technet%20forum%20dedicated%20to%20WSUS.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ERajkumar%20-%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3ECorrect%20-%20for%20Windows%2010%201809%20there%20will%20just%20be%20the%20new%20smaller%20cumulative%20update.%26nbsp%3B%20Much%20less%20confusing%20than%20having%20Full%20updates%2C%20delta%20updates%20and%20express%20updates%20%3A).%26nbsp%3B%20The%20new%20smaller%20cumulative%20update%20will%20work%20with%20WSUS%20and%20SCCM.%26nbsp%3B%20SCCM%20CB%201806%20will%20work%20with%20the%20new%20smaller%20update.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3Ethanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMike%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-263289%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-263289%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHello%20Mike%2C%20Just%20for%20a%20clarification%20purpose%20and%20for%20my%20understanding.%20From%20next%20version%20of%20Windows%2010%3B%20there%20will%20no%20express%20update%20type%20and%20other%20update%20type%3F%20Many%20of%20my%20customers%20interested%20to%20adopt%20to%20Windows%20Express%20Updates%20but%20why%20there%20are%20so%20many%20changes%20in%20Update%20Delivery%20Type%20Mechanism%20and%20so%20quickly..%20My%20customers%20running%20on%20SCCM%20%2B%20WSUS%20to%20patch%20their%20devices%20monthly.%20Does%20these%20changes%20applies%20to%20SCCM%20%2B%20WSUS%20as%20well%3F%20In%20this%20case%3B%20how%20the%20supportability%20and%20integration%20with%20SCCM.%20Again%20any%20changes%20to%20SCCM%20Client%20Agent%20Settings%20or%20Site%20Servers%20required.%3F%20Currently%20from%20SCCM%20CB%201806%20there%20are%20improvements%20in%20place%20to%20initiate%20Software%20Update%20Maintenance%20from%20SCCM%20and%20that%20takes%20care%20of%20cleaning%20up%20the%20DP%20space%20and%20WSUS%20content%20directory.%20If%20it%20next%20major%20version%20release%3B%20which%20is%20the%20next%20version%20of%20release%20we%20are%20talking%201809%3F%20Do%20Microsoft%20have%20a%20roadmap%20of%20offering%20single%20Update%20Delivery%20Type%20Mechanism%20instead%20of%20multiple%20types%20and%20changes%20happens%20quickly%20to%20adopt%20for%20Enterprise%20customers..%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-248196%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-248196%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhy%20is%20WSUS%20not%20operating%20as%20a%20multi-threaded%20process%20all%20the%20time%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3ETask%20Manager%20graphs%20sugests%20that%20the%20dispatcher%20is%20switching%20between%20cores%2C%20but%20they%20are%20not%20all%20active%20at%20the%20same%20time.%3CBR%20%2F%3EOverall%20utilization%20is%20below%2020%25%20most%20of%20the%20time%20during%20the%20update.%26nbsp%3BWhy%20is%20that%20and%20what%20are%20they%20waiting%20on%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EMachine%20is%20an%208th%20Gen%20i7%2C%2016G%2C%20SSD%20and%20a%20100Mbps%20Fi0%20conection.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20in%20advance.%20Regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEQ%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-244384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-244384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWill%20this%20new%20%22Quality%20Update%22%20require%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-WSUS%20server%20to%20be%202016%20or%20will%202012r2%20WSUS%20servers%20be%20supported%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%22Express%20Updates%22%20enabled%20on%20the%20downstream%20WSUS%20servers%20(DISA%20provides%20DOD%20upstream%20and%20they%20don't%20enable%20that%20feature)%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-235717%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-235717%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20the%20detailed%20explanation%20!!~%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234860%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234860%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20Mike%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat's%20what%20I%20wanted%20to%20know%20about%20the%20%22inner%20workings%22%20of%20the%20new%20%22small%20updates%22.%3CBR%20%2F%3EThe%20back%20and%20forth%20patching%20sounds%20crazy%20-%20great%20solution%20if%20that%20works%20reliable%20and%20fast.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECheers%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%20Klaus%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234798%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234798%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Mike%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you%20for%20that%20detailed%20explanation.%20Certainly%20answers%20a%20lot%20of%20questions.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20your%20Small%20Update%20example%2C%20you%20indicate%20the%20update%20would%20first%20apply%20the%20back%20delta%20from%20September%20to%20RTM%2C%20then%20apply%20the%20forward%20delta%20from%20RTM%20to%20October.%20Are%20there%20cleanup%20mechanisms%20built%20in%20that%20will%20automatically%20cleanup%20the%20accumulation%20of%20delta%20information%3F%20Or%20would%20this%20data%20be%20cleaned%20up%20through%20use%20of%20Disk%20Cleanup%3F%20Or%20by%20nature%20of%20the%20design%20will%20there%20be%20no%20accumulation%20aside%20from%20the%20last%20installed%20LCU%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYes%2C%20the%20LCU%20(latest%20cumulative%20update)%20is%20still%20cumulative%20and%20contains%20both%20security%20and%20non-security%20updates.%26nbsp%3B%20There%20are%20no%20changes%20in%20the%20update%20payload%20within%20the%20cumulative%20update.%26nbsp%3B%20Only%20change%20was%20to%20how%20it%20is%20stored.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI'll%20try%20my%20best%20to%20explain%20how%20the%20new%20system%20works.%26nbsp%3B%20In%20my%20explanation%20I'll%20refer%20to%203%20update%20types%20-%20Full%20Update%2C%20Express%20Update%2C%20and%20now%20the%20new%20Smaller%20Update.%26nbsp%3B%20Each%20of%20these%20updates%20types%20are%20just%20different%20formats%2C%20but%20the%20end%20result%20on%20your%20system%20would%20be%20the%20same%20thing%20-%20a%20fully%20cumulative%20update%20that%20gives%20you%20all%20the%20security%20and%20non-security%20patches%20for%20the%20Windows%20OS%20in%20one%20package.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EFull%20Update%20-%20contains%20compressed%20version%20(similar%20to%20ZIP%20style%20compression)%20of%20every%20component%20and%20binary%20that%20has%20changed%20in%20the%20OS%20since%20RTM%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EExpress%20Update%20-%20The%20server%20contains%20compressed%20deltas%20from%20multiple%20baselines%20for%20every%20component%20and%20binary%20that%20has%20changed%20since%20RTM.%26nbsp%3B%20Your%20machine%20chats%20back%20and%20forth%20with%20the%20server%20(the%20server%20could%20be%20Windows%20Update%20itself%2C%20or%20it%20could%20be%20a%20local%20WSUS%20server)%20to%20identify%20which%20byte%20ranges%20it%20needs%20and%20then%20downloads%20those%20ranges.%26nbsp%3B%20Your%20device%20then%20hydrates%20those%20byte%20ranges%20back%20into%20complete%20files%20on%20your%20device%20and%20then%20does%20an%20installation.%20By%20multiple%20baselines%2C%20I%20mean%20that%20it%20includes%20deltas%20from%20specific%20points%20in%20time.%26nbsp%3B%20Generally%20we%20use%20last%20months%20LCU%20(N)%2C%20the%20month%20before%20(N-1)%20all%20the%20way%20back%20N-5%20months%2C%20and%20RTM.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20the%20server%20express%20file%20could%20be%206-7GB%20while%20the%20end%20device%20only%20downloads%20150-200mb.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESmall%20Update%20-%20The%20package%20contains%20the%20compressed%20delta%20from%20RTM%20for%20each%20file%20(Forward%20Delta)%2C%20and%20the%20delta%20back%20to%20RTM%20(Reverse%20Delta).%26nbsp%3B%20Essentially%20this%20means%20instead%20of%20containing%20multiple%20baselines%2C%20it%20only%20has%201%20baseline%20(RTM).%26nbsp%3B%20As%20an%20example%2C%20if%20your%20device%20were%20on%20the%20September%20LCU%20and%20then%20you%20installed%20October%2C%20your%20machine%20would%20apply%20the%20September%20reverse%20delta%20to%20go%20back%20to%20RTM%20and%20then%20the%20October%20forward%20delta%20to%20go%20to%20October%20(10B).%26nbsp%3B%20It%20does%20this%20in%20a%20transaction%20so%20there%20is%20no%20possibility%20of%20your%20device%20being%20stuck%20in%20the%20middle%20somewhere%20-%20either%20the%20full%20update%20succeeds%20or%20does%20not.%26nbsp%3B%20Since%20all%20the%20content%20is%20in%20the%20package%20itself%2C%20no%20server%20negotiation%20is%20needed.%20%26nbsp%3B%20Because%20it%20only%20has%20a%20single%20baseline%20(from%20RTM)%20it%20will%20sometimes%20be%20larger%20than%20an%20express%20update%20for%20someone%20that%20was%20on%20the%20previous%20months%20patch.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20the%20size%20difference%20should%20be%20minimal%2C%20and%20without%20the%20server%20negotiation%20and%20on%20device%20analysis%20it%20uses%20less%20CPU%20during%20download%20and%20install.%20%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhat%20is%20really%20great%20about%20the%20new%20smaller%20package%20format%20is%20that%20same%20file%20is%20available%20from%20Windows%20Update%2C%20WSUS%2C%20and%20Catalog.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20even%20if%20you%20download%20from%20HTTPS%20(Catalog)%20and%20double%20click%20to%20install%20you%20get%20the%20smaller%20experience.%26nbsp%3B%20Unlike%20express%20that%20only%20worked%20via%20Windows%20update%20or%20WSUS%20(or%203rd%20parties%20solutions%20that%20support%20the%20express%20protocol).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETo%20make%20this%20change%2C%20there%20were%20modifications%20needed%20in%20both%20the%20package%20format%20itself%2C%20and%20in%20the%20update%20stack%20on%20the%20client.%26nbsp%3B%20Making%20those%20types%20of%20changes%20to%20older%20versions%20of%20the%20OS%20would%20be%20risky%20(the%20update%20stack%20is%20absolutely%20critical).%26nbsp%3B%20With%20a%20new%20version%20of%20the%20OS%20we%20have%20many%20months%20of%20both%20internal%20testing%20as%20well%20as%20Windows%20Insider%20previews%20that%20we%20can%20use%20to%20validate%20the%20changes%20at%20scale%20and%20reduce%20risk.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMike%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234664%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234664%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECould%20I%20confirm%20that%20the%20latest%20cumulative%20update%20for%20Windows%2010%20is%20still%20mixed%20with%20security%20patches%20%2B%20non%20security%20patches%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECould%20you%20help%20share%20the%20mechanism%20behind%20for%20how%20it%20reduces%20the%20size%20of%20package%20while%20all%20updates%20are%20still%20included%20%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234501%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234501%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECould%20you%20go%20into%20the%20details%20of%20how%20you%20are%20compressing%20the%20file%20in%20order%20to%20get%20these%20updates%20smaller%20and%20why%20it%20can't%20be%20backported%20to%20prior%20versions%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234402%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234402%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI'll%20try%20to%20consolidate%20my%20answers%20in%20one%20reply%20here.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESusan%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EServicing%20stack%20updates%20will%20still%20be%20needed%20when%20there%20are%20servicing%20stack%20issues%20that%20need%20to%20be%20fixed.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJeremy%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIt%20will%20continue%20to%20be%20cumulative%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDevin%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3EExpress%20took%20a%20lot%20of%20CPU%20time%2C%20and%20this%20new%20format%20will%20take%20much%20less.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20it%20should%20install%20faster%2C%20but%20it%20will%20heavily%20depend%20on%20the%20speed%20of%20your%20machine%20(slower%20machines%20will%20benefit%20more)%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EKlaus%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWhat%20inner%20workings%20would%20you%20like%20to%20know%20about%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAnoni%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYes%2C%20we%20believe%20this%20will%20be%20a%20lot%20better%20for%20many%20customers%20due%20to%20the%20reduced%20size.%26nbsp%3B%20Especially%20enterprise%20customers%20or%20small%20and%20medium%20business%20that%20have%20multiple%20branch%20offices.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3Ethanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMike%20Benson%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-233766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-233766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20has%20been%20a%20major%20issue%20for%20many%20of%20my%20customers%20not%20to%20adopt%20Windows%2010%2C%20as%20they%20have%20poor%20network%20connectivity%20and%20slow%20networks.%20Let%20us%20hope%20that%20Microsoft%20really%20decreases%20the%20size%20of%20those%20updates%20to%20a%20level%20my%20clients%20won't%20have%20this%20excuse%20anymore.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'd%20also%20love%20to%20see%20only%20ONE%20version%20of%20Windows%2C%20no%20Home%2C%20no%20Enterprise%2C%20no%20Professional%2C%20or%20any%20other%20flavors%26nbsp%3B%20Just%20one%20Windows%20version!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-233704%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-233704%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECould%20you%20please%20provide%20some%20details%20about%20the%20inner%20workings%20of%20the%20new%20updates%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-233649%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-233649%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECan%20we%20also%20expect%20for%20the%20updates%20to%20install%20faster%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-233626%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-233626%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWith%20this%20new%20Monthly%20Quality%20Update%2C%20will%20it%20be%20cumulative%20like%20the%20full%20update%20was%3F%20Or%20will%20it%20become%20a%20monthly%20non-cumulative%20update%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-231597%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-231597%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWill%20this%20impact%20the%20need%20for%20servicing%20stack%20updates%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-230335%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-230335%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENice%2C%20thank%20you%20for%20reduce%20the%20updating%20size%2C%20and%20the%20overview%20information.%20%3Asmiling_face_with_smiling_eyes%3A%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-570538%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-570538%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20can%20no%20longer%20tell%20if%20Server%20SKU%20and%20Desktop%20SKU%20Latest%20Cumulative%20Updates%20are%20still%20Server%20and%20Desktop%2C%20or%20if%20they%20are%20identical%20packages%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ecatalog.update.microsoft.com%202019-04%201709%20LCU%20for%20Server%20and%20Desktop%20are%20the%20same%20URL.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fd%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fupdt%2F2019%2F03%2Fwindows10.0-kb4489890-x64_724e3d202fec9a1a2b84848aba054a4f416e2cb0.msu%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fd%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fupdt%2F2019%2F03%2Fwindows10.0-kb4489890-x64_724e3d202fec9a1a2b84848aba054a4f416e2cb0.msu%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fd%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fupdt%2F2019%2F03%2Fwindows10.0-kb4489890-x64_724e3d202fec9a1a2b84848aba054a4f416e2cb0.msu%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fd%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fupdt%2F2019%2F03%2Fwindows10.0-kb4489890-x64_724e3d202fec9a1a2b84848aba054a4f416e2cb0.msu%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ecatalog.update.microsoft.com%202019-05%201903%20LCU%20for%20Server%20and%20Desktop%20are%20the%20same%20also.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.catalog.update.microsoft.com%2FSearch.aspx%3Fq%3D2019-05%2520x64%25201903%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.catalog.update.microsoft.com%2FSearch.aspx%3Fq%3D2019-05%2520x64%25201903%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fc%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fsecu%2F2019%2F05%2Fwindows10.0-kb4497936-x64_4ac9328bb1376d2cadb09f56ba95ac9b08b88fba.msu%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Fdownload.windowsupdate.com%2Fc%2Fmsdownload%2Fupdate%2Fsoftware%2Fsecu%2F2019%2F05%2Fwindows10.0-kb4497936-x64_4ac9328bb1376d2cadb09f56ba95ac9b08b88fba.msu%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F113401i15EE814CA85A780A%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22LCU-Same.jpg%22%20title%3D%22LCU-Same.jpg%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20are%20they%20the%20same%20now%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-571328%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-571328%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%20Neo%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EServer%20and%20Client%20updates%20have%20always%20been%20in%20the%20same%20package.%26nbsp%3B%20They%20share%20a%20lot%20of%20components%2C%20so%20it's%20easier%20for%20admins%20if%20we%20ship%20them%20together%20as%20one%20update.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3Ethanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMike%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-636947%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20What%E2%80%99s%20next%20for%20Windows%2010%20and%20Windows%20Server%20quality%20updates%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-636947%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F157438%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Mike%20Benson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOk%20thanks.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPreviously%20-%20packages%20downloaded%20from%20the%20update%20catalog%20marked%20as%20'Server'%20weren't%20able%20to%20be%20installed%20to%20a%20'Desktop'%20image%20using%20ADK%20DandISetEnv%2C%20and%20vice-versa.%201703%20is%20when%20I%20was%20building%20and%20the%20packages%20were%20still%20seperate.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20just%20wanted%20to%20ask%2C%20while%20I'm%20here%2C%20the%20latest%201903%20SSU%20KB4500109%20has%20an%20internal%20WSUSSCAN.cab%20-%20however%20the%20manifest%20is%20checking%20signatures%20from%202004...%20is%20this%20correct%3F%20I'm%20asking%20because%20the%20LCU%20KB4497936%20and%20KB4505057%20are%20failing%20to%20be%20applied%20to%20the%20Recovery%20image%20'Winre.wim'%20-%20I've%20posted%20details%20about%20it%20here%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FWinHEC-Online%2FADK-18362-1-DISM-Fails-Offline-Install-for-kb4497936-kb4505057%2Fm-p%2F624129%23M14%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FWinHEC-Online%2FADK-18362-1-DISM-Fails-Offline-Install-for-kb4497936-kb4505057%2Fm-p%2F624129%23M14%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20most%20concerning%20error%20message%20is%20about%20Vista%2C%20which%20happens%20if%20the%20Add-Package%20command%20is%20run%20a%20second%20time%2C%20after%20it%20has%20failed%20the%20first%20time%2C%20with%20the%2080070002%20Error.%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CPRE%3EE%3A%5CWinROG%5Cwindows10.0-kb4497936-x64_4ac9328bb1376d2cadb09f56ba95ac9b08b88fba.msu%3A%20An%20error%20occurred%20applying%20the%20Unattend.xml%20file%20from%20the%20.msu%20package.%0AFor%20more%20information%2C%20review%20the%20log%20file.%0A%20Error%3A%200x80070002%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EPS%20E%3A%5CWinROG%26gt%3B%20DISM%20%2FImage%3AE%3A%5CWinROG%5Cmount%5CRE%20%2FAdd-Package%20%2FPackagePath%3A%22E%3A%5CWinROG%5Cwindows10.0-kb4497936-x64_4ac9328bb1376d2cadb09f56ba95ac9b08b88fba.msu%22%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%0ADeployment%20Image%20Servicing%20and%20Management%20tool%0AVersion%3A%2010.0.18362.1%3CBR%20%2F%3EError%2050.%3CBR%20%2F%3EDISM%20does%20not%20support%20servicing%20a%20Windows%20Vista%20RTM%20or%20earlier%20operating%20system.%20If%20the%20operating%20system%20is%20supported%20check%20that%20SSShim.DLL%20is%20present.%3C%2FPRE%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Version history
Last update:
‎Aug 16 2018 10:45 AM
Updated by: