Storage at Microsoft

Options
8,938
Ned Pyle on Jan 26 2024 11:24 AM
2,942
Ned Pyle on Nov 28 2023 09:42 AM
3,921
Ned Pyle on Nov 15 2023 10:33 AM
9,815
Ned Pyle on Nov 08 2023 10:01 AM
8,703
Ned Pyle on Nov 08 2023 10:01 AM
7,431
Ned Pyle on Nov 07 2023 09:59 AM
11.4K
Ned Pyle on Oct 25 2023 10:08 AM
12.4K
Ned Pyle on Oct 20 2023 09:49 AM
10.1K
Ned Pyle on Oct 18 2023 10:16 AM
11.4K
Ned Pyle on Sep 13 2023 10:42 AM
36.7K
Ned Pyle on Sep 13 2023 10:41 AM
14.2K
Ned Pyle on Jun 13 2023 11:24 AM
27.1K
Ned Pyle on Jun 02 2023 10:43 AM
12.3K
Ned Pyle on Mar 08 2023 03:12 PM
3,585
Ned Pyle on Mar 07 2023 10:08 AM
6,517
Ned Pyle on Feb 15 2023 10:17 AM
6,162
Ned Pyle on Feb 01 2023 12:15 PM
3,817
Ned Pyle on Jan 25 2023 09:35 AM
12K
Ned Pyle on Jan 13 2023 09:45 AM
6,347
Ned Pyle on Jan 10 2023 10:47 AM
4,764
Ned Pyle on Dec 02 2022 10:45 AM
8,612
Ned Pyle on Oct 14 2022 01:18 PM
56.4K
Ned Pyle on Oct 03 2022 10:35 AM
18.6K
Ned Pyle on Sep 21 2022 11:01 AM
17.6K
Ned Pyle on Aug 26 2022 01:55 PM
70K
Ned Pyle on Apr 19 2022 10:40 AM
189K
Ned Pyle on Mar 16 2022 12:29 PM
5,622
Ned Pyle on Mar 15 2022 10:27 AM
5,552
Ned Pyle on Feb 10 2022 11:13 AM
7,406
Ned Pyle on Nov 10 2021 01:34 PM

Latest Comments

@Bhanoday_Puram Do you know if 4.9.0 addresses the bug outlined in Storage Migration Service Error 36890 - Microsoft Community Hub, being encountered by multiple people including myself. I have logged a ticket on this and see from that post that someone else also raised a ticket in relation to this ...
0 Likes
@Bhanoday_Puram I assume for changes with WAC new gateway? So no feature improvements / fixes?
0 Likes
We are in the migration of our release pipelines internally for Windows Admin Center - extensions and the version bump from 4.1.0 to 4.9.0 was an effect of that and has not a big impact on the workings of the storage migration service itself!
1 Likes
Dear @Ned Pyle,just noticed that Storage Migration Service WAC extension has seen a huge increment. from 4.1.0 to 4.9.0. May I ask if there is a changelog available for that one?
1 Likes
@jmacikanycz Sort of. Requiring SMB 3.x on Win10 would give you the same effect as requiring encryption would implicitly mandate SMB 3.x. It's possible for us to backport this too, but a customer has to open a DCR through their contract (I think it's called Unified Support now?) and request it.
0 Likes