Forum Discussion
Read Only (Padlock Icon) files - OFDB 17.3.6743.1212
Hi, no I'm not doing doing either of these, and the MS Engineer checked if these had been activated somehow, but is not the case. It also is not related to SharePoint or local security permissions. I had been running the new client successfully, until updating to the Preview client (1212) a few days back. I think it's a bug.
Hi,
This was a known issue in the preview client and was listed, although not right at the top as it should have been! The preview clinet has now been released as a full release, and this has STILL not been fixed. I agree this is a significant issue that potentially hurts collaboration. Everyone who is having this issue and is concerned should vote for this to be fixed on UserVoice
https://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/17864110-fix-synch-client-to-allow-editable-synching-of-tea
- Geoff SwimerJun 27, 2017Copper Contributor
Hi, I finally found the solution to my nasty green padlocked files and folders. Looks as though this is is a "feature" rather than a bug:
In Sharepoint (365) went to Library Settings for the Library,
Versioning Settings,
under "Who should see draft items in this document library?" chose "Any user who can read items" instead of the default (?) "Only users who can edit items"
The padlocked icons disappearered after exiting the sync client and logging back in to ODFB
- Jaro JasekAug 01, 2017Copper Contributor
Hi,
I also found one check, what can be only this setting :
"Do you want to approve content for submitted items?" - NoIf is Yes - also I have Pdalock Icon
- Saurabh SachanJan 12, 2022Copper ContributorThis worked for me
- Salvatore BiscariJun 27, 2017Silver Contributor
Interesting...
To be precise, though, the default is "Any user who can read items", i.e. the first radio button. It changes to "Only users who can approve items (and the author of the item)", i.e. the third radio button, when you enable "Require content approval for submitted items".
- Skye ForsterJan 30, 2017Brass ContributorThis is enormously frustrating. What on earth is the point of having a sync client that only works with the simplest of libraries? If they aren't going to fix this issue then at least don't allow libraries with mandatory metadata to be synched so at least people are aware.