Forum Discussion
AAD COnnect object not in metaverse
- Dec 25, 2019
VasilMichev Thanks for the article.
I'm really trying to follow this but the verbiage is confusing:
" In the following scoping filter, if the isCriticalSystemObject value is null or FALSE or empty, it's in scope."When I look at the "In from AD - User Join" and the scoping filter shows isCriticalSystemObject has a value of "TRUE" … so according to the statement above this rule is NOT in scope? the double negative is confusing me, also because User Join sounds like its something that SHOULD be in scope right?
It can simply be filtered by one of the default (or custom) rules. You should see which of those affect the object when you run the preview/commit. And do force a Full sync as some changes might not be reflected upon delta.
- ch0wd0wnDec 19, 2019Copper Contributor
VasilMichev Ok I will check that but how can I tell which rule is applying during the preview? Sorry I'm very new at this
- ch0wd0wnDec 19, 2019Copper Contributor
VasilMichev When I click Generate Preview...all it says is successful. Then I click on the source object details...it shows whole bunch of stuff on the "NEW VALUE" column and "OLD VALUE" is empty...which is to be expected since this is not syncing yet. And that's all I see...I don't see rules or anything
- VasilMichevDec 19, 2019MVP
Check the documentation for more guidance, including screenshots: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/hybrid/tshoot-connect-object-not-syncing#connector-space-object-properties
- ch0wd0wnDec 25, 2019Copper Contributor
VasilMichev Thanks for the article.
I'm really trying to follow this but the verbiage is confusing:
" In the following scoping filter, if the isCriticalSystemObject value is null or FALSE or empty, it's in scope."When I look at the "In from AD - User Join" and the scoping filter shows isCriticalSystemObject has a value of "TRUE" … so according to the statement above this rule is NOT in scope? the double negative is confusing me, also because User Join sounds like its something that SHOULD be in scope right?