updates
9 TopicsUnable to access Update 3 for Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics 1.9
Hi, Microsoft Tech Community and Ricky Simpsonfrom Microsoft, I cannot download Update 3 for Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics 1.9. Whenever I tried to access the download update from this article, it seemed the ID number 56725 was missing, and an error code of 404 was returned. Tried URL: https://www.microsoft.com/download/details.aspx?id=56725 Hope you can fix this problem as soon as possible, because Microsoft ATA still plays an important role in most of the enterprise network, including my company's network. Best regards for all people in the communitySolvedMDI Sensor Updates options?
Hi, So far we have noticed that MDI Sensor updates can be "automatic" or "delayed". However, for our Production environment, we'd like these updates to be controlled by our team, once they have done their testing in a TEST Environment (i.e. we do not want them to be "automatic" or "delayed"). How do we therefore change the MDI Sensor update to be "manual", or via SCCM or similar? Thank you, SK944Views0likes3CommentsMDI Sensor Implications of renaming a DC and or migrating to a new server
Howdy Folks, One of our clients have a 2 DC (Windows Server 2012 R2) environment. They will soon be migrated to new servers (Windows Server 2019) potentially with Different host names. Has anyone dealt with this before? What implications it may have (except obviously the sensor will have to be installed on those DCs) i.e. - such as Event log configurations, Permissions and GPO configurations etc.. - would we need to reconfigure in the new servers or will they be migrated? Cheers!Missing features in Security portal
With the Azure ATP portal we where able to do a lot more of investigation for on premises actions. We are in a large hybrid environment. Is there a way to access the old portal to get back that timeline for a user? The things we are missing out on currently that we found are the following: Password resets, where able to see that easy at the users timeline. Users being added to or removed from groups and who did it Failed logins to on premises resources You can no longer search for groups Can't export the same data as in the ATP portal. Some of us used this daily and are having trouble to figure out how to get the correct information now. I'm aware that we can see some of those things in the users audit logs for example but would be nice to be able to see it in the timeline as before.SolvedAzure ATP Sensor - Update Process Large Number of Domain Controllers
Hello, this question may have already been asked/answered but I have not been able to find a previous thread. I have a customer with a large number of domain controllers (over 1000). The DCs are located in branch office locations as well in data centers. The customer is currently evaluating moving from ATA to ATP. I understand there are two update update options for the Sensor, Immediate and Delayed. We are concerned with hundreds of domain controllers attempting to download/install updates at the same time. Are there any other sensor update configuration options such as creating collections of servers? Another thought we had was to disable the automatic update and use another mechanism (SCCM) for deploying the updates more granular. We were also wondering if there is a way to schedule the upgrade time period? Does any one else in the Tech Community have experience with ATP in a large ADDS count environment? Thanks!1.2KViews0likes1CommentAzure ATP sensor update and communication error
Hello, I have noticed some errors on our ATP Health Center. The sensors installed on two DC randomly stopped communicating. After some time the health alert is automatically closed. Concurrently with this errors I noticed on the sensor logs this entries: Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.Updater.log 2020-01-31 02:41:55.5375 Warn ResourceManager RestrictCpuAsync process doesn't exist [Process=Microsoft.Tri.Sensor] Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.log 2020-01-31 02:41:34.4173 Error FrameReader`1 CaptureFrames exception, exiting Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.FrameReaderException: Failed reading frame [resultCode=-1 message=read error: PacketReceivePacket failed] at bool Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.FrameReader<TCaptureDevice>.TryReadFrame(out DateTime time, out BufferSlice bufferSlice) at bool Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.NetworkListener.ParseFrame(FrameReader frameReader) at void Microsoft.Tri.Sensor.NetworkListener.CaptureFrames(LiveFrameReader[] liveFrameReaders) The event ID 7031 is written on the System Event Log: The Azure Advanced Threat Protection Sensor service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 5000 milliseconds: Restart the service. The sensor version is now (Jan, 31th)2.106.7618 and is marked as up to date but the version 2.107 is our from the Jan 26th. Does anyone have any suggestion? Thanks. MikeSolvedAzure ATP mail notification options change
Hi everyone, To make the Azure ATP email notification options more streamlined, we are removing the On\Off toggles from both the security alerts and health issues mail notification options. If you'd like to change your email notification behavior, simply add, or remove email recipients from your current lists. This change will take effect toward the end of September. *If you have unsaved recipients lists, these items will be removed. No changes are made to the Syslog notification channel.999Views0likes0CommentsMicrosoft Defender for Identity and cloud based security
Hi everyone, I'm Ricky and I'm the Product Marketing Manager for Microsoft Defender for Identity. I was looking to start a discussion with the outstanding community we are fortunate to have here around a topic I've been tracking. I was looking for input around cloud based security and the merits it provides, and how this stacks up against your views of how you've maybe tackled security updates in the past. Defender for Identity's capabilities are excellent because we offer cloud based protection in an age of advanced threats being able to propagate throughout an environment very quickly. I'm looking to uncover your views on the process of connecting your DCs to the internet (via a highly configured one way proxy of course) to gain all the benefits that Defender for Identity offers. Specifically, I'd be interested to know whether it would be perceived as a bigger or smaller risk of not having Defender for Identity protection, and what you're doing to help protect your on-premises identities as is. If this is the case, how are you correlating this information with other data sources from security products? It would also be great to see any opinions on how updates are perceived. Does the benefits of having cloud based servicing to Defender for Identity provide enough advantages in today's security landscape as opposed to waiting for updates to land on Patch Tuesday, for example? Maybe you're already a Defender for Identity customer and you went through this risk analysis before you implemented the solution - it would be great to get your viewpoint too. There are no right or wrong answers here, and I just want to see a variety of opinions on the subject. Thanks for getting involved. Will be great to see some feedback on this! RickyMicrosoft Defender for Identity and Npcap
Hi everyone, Note that starting from MDI version 2.156, we are including the 1.0 OEM version of the Npcap executable in the Sensor deployment package file. What's new in Microsoft Defender for Identity | Microsoft Docs So all you have to do is download the new package and extract the file from the ZIP archive. The Microsoft Defender for Identity team is currently recommending that all customers deploy the Npcap driver before deploying the sensor on a domain controller or AD FS server. This will ensure that Npcap driver will be used instead of the WinPcap driver. For more information on MDI and NPCAP, please refer to our FAQSolved