Meet DART, the people behind Microsoft Incident Response
When threat actors infiltrate a company to steal documents and other critical business information, Microsoft Incident Response - the Detection and Response Team (DART) responds. With more than 4,500 engagements in 2024 and more than a millennium of combined experience, these responders are the calm in the storm when a compromise occurs. Whether they’re confronting ransomware, nation-state actors, or zero-day exploits, DART blends their knowledge and years of experience with agility, empathy, and storytelling to guide organizations from disruption to clarity. This blog introduces the people behind DART, which includes forensic analysts, infrastructure specialists, and threat hunters whose mission is to contain attacks, restore trust, and build resilience for the future. DART DART isn’t just a lifeline during a crisis, they’re strategic partners in building cyber resilience before threat actors strike. Through a suite of proactive services, the team helps organizations identify vulnerabilities, harden critical systems, and prepare for the unexpected. Proactive offerings like compromise assessments, identity reviews, and threat briefings allow customers to uncover hidden risks and receive tailored recommendations without the pressure of an active breach. By leveraging Microsoft’s vast threat intelligence and engineering access, organizations gain insights into emerging tactics and trends, ensuring their security posture evolves ahead of the threat landscape. In short, DART empowers defenders to out-think threat actors by mapping potential pathways, closing gaps, and rehearsing responses - so when the real thing happens, they’re ready. Cyber Frontier: Real-World Insights from Microsoft & DART The cyber threat landscape is constantly evolving, forcing defenders to rethink traditional security models. The past year, DART has observed shifts in tactics driven by the rise of AI and the relentless pursuit of identity compromise. Threat actors are no longer just exploiting vulnerabilities; they’re weaponizing automation, scaling social engineering, and monetizing stolen access in ways that blur the line between cybercrime and organized business models. In this new paradigm, resilience, global collaboration, and anticipatory defense aren’t optional; they’re survival. Microsoft Digital Defense Report 2025[1] ranks the largest causes of cyberattacks and prominent trends: Phishing remained the most common initial access method. While there were many changes in the threat landscape, multifactor authentication (MFA) still blocks over 99% of unauthorized access attempts, making it the single most important security measure an organization can implement. While phishing remains a common initial access method, campaigns are moving away from simple phishing as defense approaches evolve. Threat actors increasingly leverage multi-stage attack chains that mix technical exploits and social engineering to gain unauthorized access and maintain persistence. In more than 90% of cases where cyberattacks progressed to the ransom stage, the threat actor had leveraged unmanaged devices in the network. This highlights the impact of gaps in endpoint visibility on threat actor progression. Just as businesses are leveraging generative AI for productivity gains, threat actors are also using AI to augment traditional cyberattacks by automating activities from vulnerability discovery to deepfake content generation. As AI adoption becomes increasingly commonplace, these tools’ access to proprietary and sensitive data has also made AI systems an attractive target for malicious activity. Nation-state actor and ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) actor activity also evolved, moving away from centralized command-and-control servers and instead leveraging cover, peer-to-peer networks to avoid detection and survive through takedowns by redistributing workloads across participants. Meet some of the DARTians DART members are a diverse and highly skilled team of individuals with the depth of expertise and experience to solve problems quickly. They continually adjust their actions based on what they learn. They can lock down a network, isolate an endpoint, or remove a threat actor before damage is done. CISOs, security teams, and our IR people share this common passion, commitment, and goal - to protect organizations against threats. We recently interviewed several of our team members about how they got into IR work, their most memorable engagements, advice they have for customers, and more. Here are some key highlights from those interviews: How did you get your start? “My journey began in 2005 when I enlisted in the US Marines and was assigned to the data field, managing servers, routers, and switches, and ensuring the network kept running smoothly. That technical foundation soon led me to a cybersecurity role for the Marine Corps at Quantico, where I first tasted what it meant to defend against real threats. As a Security Operations Center (SOC) analyst, I quickly discovered that cybersecurity is both broad and deep. It opened my eyes to how vulnerabilities are exploited and how a simple oversight can become a major incident.” – Edwin “My path into cybersecurity wasn’t exactly a straight line. During the early parts of my career, I worked in business advisory and enterprise sales and was pursuing a path to an MBA from one of the major business schools. While corporate strategy and incident response may feel worlds apart, being able to bridge both has been my tactical advantage in working with our customers to demystify the events that take place in the cyber trenches I now call home.” – Pru “The idea of tracking digital adversaries and solving complex puzzles always fascinated me, so when an opportunity arose in 2014 to join a Cyber Warfare unit, I took it. It felt like stepping into a story told in the movies, only the stakes were real, and the learning was relentless.” – Max Most memorable DART engagement moments “We quickly gained trusted advisor status and were brought into the investigation. Together, we uncovered internet-facing servers with weak permissions that allowed the threat actor to pivot between on-premises and cloud environments using privileged accounts. In the end, we shut down the threat actor’s access, rebuilt compromised systems, reduced excessive permissions, and delivered a roadmap to strengthen defenses.” – Adrian Advice for customers "Nearly every major incident we see starts with compromised identity: weak credentials, stolen passwords, or missed phishing alerts. Enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) is critical.” – Max “Proactive defense pays off: Tools like Secure Score and strategies such as the tiering model can drastically reduce risk. Don’t wait until an incident to play catch up and try to fortify defenses while also putting out a fire, it is best to act now.” – Edwin “It may sound simple or even boring, but over 99% of cyberattacks can be prevented with MFA in place. It’s the digital equivalent of locking your front door and having an alarm system, and it’s easy and inexpensive to implement.” – Pru “Teamwork is essential: No one succeeds in cybersecurity alone. Collaboration, both within your team and across organizations, is often the deciding factor in a successful response.” – Adrian “Tools powered by AI, like Microsoft Copilot, have become invaluable in helping to quickly analyze suspicious processes, understand command lines, and connect the dots in complex investigations.” – Max Building a safer digital world, together DART doesn’t just solve technical problems - they help people through some of the most challenging moments of their careers. Every compromise is a puzzle, every engagement a chance to restore trust and build resilience. What drives them isn’t just the scale or complexity of the work - it’s the impact they can make, one incident at a time. Learn more To learn more about Microsoft’s Incident Response capabilities and DART, please visit Microsoft Incident Response | Microsoft Security. Read the latest installment of the Cybersecurity Series. To read more about Microsoft Incident Response in action, read our latest installment of the Cyberattack Series, Retail at risk: How one alert uncovered a persistent cyberthreat. Sources 1 Microsoft Digital Defense Report 2025 | Microsoft
Cloud forensics: Why enabling Microsoft Azure Key Vault logs matters
Co-authors - Christoph Dreymann - Abul Azed - Shiva P. Introduction As organizations increase their cloud adoption to accelerate AI readiness, Microsoft Incident Response has observed the rise of cloud-based threats as attackers seek to access sensitive data and exploit vulnerabilities stemming from misconfigurations often caused by rapid deployments. In this blog series, Cloud Forensics, we share insights from our frontline investigations to help organizations better understand the evolving threat landscape and implement effective strategies to protect their cloud environments. This blog post explores the importance of enabling and analyzing Microsoft Azure Key Vault logs in the context of security investigations. Microsoft Incident Response has observed cases where threat actors specifically targeted Key Vault instances. In the absence of proper logging, conducting thorough investigations becomes significantly more difficult. Given the highly sensitive nature of the data stored in Key Vault, it is a common target for malicious activity. Moreover, attacks against this service often leave minimal forensic evidence when verbose logging is not properly configured during deployment. We will walk through realistic attack scenarios, illustrating how these threats manifest in log data and highlighting the value of enabling comprehensive logging for detection. Key Vault Key Vault is a cloud service designed for secure storage and retrieval of critical secrets such as passwords or database connection strings. In addition to secrets, it can store other information such as certificates and cryptographic keys. To ensure effective monitoring of activities performed on a specific instance of Key Vault, it is essential to enable logging. When audit logging is not enabled, and there is a security breach, it is often difficult to ascertain which secrets were accessed without comprehensive logs. Given the importance of the assets protected by Key Vault, it is imperative to enable logging during the deployment phase. How to enable logging Logging must be enabled separately for each Key Vault instance either in the Microsoft Azure portal, Azure command-line interface (CLI) or Azure PowerShell. How to enable logging can be found here. Alternatively, it can be configured within the default log analytics workspace as an Azure Policy. How to use this method can be found here. By directing these logs to a Log Analytics workspace, storage account, or event hub for security information and event management (SIEM) ingestion, they can be utilized for threat detection and, more importantly, to ascertain when an identity was compromised and which type of sensitive information was accessed through that compromised identity. Without this logging, it is difficult to confirm whether any material has been accessed and therefore may need to be treated as compromised. NOTE: There are no license requirements to enable logging within Key Vault, but Log Analytics charges based on ingestion and retention for usage of that service (Pricing - Azure Monitor | Microsoft Azure) Next, we will review the structure of the Audit Logs originating from the Key Vault instance. These logs are located in the AzureDiagnostics table. Interesting fields Below is a good starting query to begin investigating activity performed against a Key Vault instance: AzureDiagnostics | where ResourceType == 'VAULTS' The "operationName" field is of particular significance as it indicates the type of operation that took place. An overview of Key Vault operations can be found here. The "Identity" field includes details about the identity responsible for an activity, such as the object identifier and UPN. Lastly, the “callerIpAddress” shows which IP address the requests originate from. The table below displays the fields highlighted and used in this article. Field name Description time Date and time in UTC. resourceId The Key Vault resource ID uniquely identifies a Key Vault in Azure and is used for various operations and configurations. callerIpAddress IP address of the client that made the request. Identity The identity structure includes various information. The identity can be a "user," a "service principal," or a combination such as "user+appId" when the request originates from an Azure PowerShell cmdlet. Different fields are available based on this. The most important ones are: identity_claim_upn_s: Specifies the upn of a user identity_claim_appid_g: Contains the appid identity_claim_idtyp_s: Shows what type of identity was used OperationName The name of the operation, for instance SecretGet Resource Key Vault Name ResourceType Always “VAULTS” requestUri_s The requested Key Vault API call contains valuable information. Each API call has its own structure. For example, the SecretGet request URI is: {vaultBaseUrl}/secrets/{secret-name}/{secret-version}?api-version=7.4. For more information, please see: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/keyvault/?view=rest-keyvault-keys-7.4 httpStatusCode_d Indicates if an API call was successful A complete list of fields can be found here. To analyze further, we need to understand how a threat actor can access a Key Vault by examining the Access Policy and Azure role-based access control (RBAC) permission model used within it. Access Policy permission model vs Azure RBAC The Access Policy Permission Model operates solely on the data plane, specifically for Azure Key Vault. The data plane is the access pathway for creating, reading, updating, and deleting assets stored within the Key Vault instance. Via a Key Vault Access Policy, you can assign individual permissions and grant access to security principals such as users, groups, service principals, and managed identities, at the Key Vault scope with appropriate Control Plane privileges. This model provides flexibility by granting access to keys, secrets, and certificates through specific permissions. However, it is considered a legacy authorization system native to Key Vault. Note: The Access Policies permission model has privilege escalation risks and lacks Privileged Identity Management support. It is not recommended for critical data and workloads. On the other hand, Azure RBAC operates on both Azure's control and data planes. It is built on Azure Resource Manager, allowing for centralized access management of Azure resources. Azure RBAC controls access by creating role assignments, which consist of a security principal, a role definition (predefined set of permissions), and a scope (a group of resources or an individual resource). RBAC offers several advantages, including a unified access control model for Azure resources and integration with Privileged Identity Management. More information regarding Azure RBAC can be found here. Now, let’s dive into how threat actors can gain access to a Key Vault. How a threat actor can access a Key Vault When a Key Vault is configured with Access Policy permission, privileges can be escalated under certain circumstances. If a threat actor gains access to an identity that has been assigned the Key Vault Contributor Azure RBAC role, Contributor role or any role that includes 'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/write' permissions, they can escalate their privileges by setting a Key Vault access policy to grant themselves data plane access, which in turn allows them to read and modify the contents of the Key Vault. Modifying the permission model requires 'Microsoft.Authorization/roleAssignments/write' permission, which is included in the Owner and User Access Administrator roles. Therefore, a threat actor cannot change the permission model without one of these roles. Any change to the authorization mode will be logged in the Activity Logs of the subscription, as shown in the figure below: If a new Access Policy is added, it will generate the following entry within the Azure Activity Log: When Azure RBAC is the permissions model for a Key Vault, a threat actor must identify an identity within the Entra ID tenant that has access to sensitive information or one capable of assigning such permissions. Information about Azure RBAC roles for Key Vault access, specifically those who can access Secrets, can be found here. A threat actor that has compromised an identity with an Owner role is authorized to manage all operations, including resources, access policies, and roles within the Key Vault. In contrast, a threat actor with a Contributor role can handle management operations but does not have access to keys, secrets, or certificates. This restriction applies when the RBAC model is used within a Key Vault. The following section will examine the typical actions performed by a threat actor after gathering permissions. Attack scenario Let's review the common steps threat actors take after gaining initial access to Microsoft Azure. We will focus on the Azure Resource Manager layer (responsible for deploying and managing resources), as its Azure RBAC or Access Policy permissions determine what a threat actor can view or access within Key Vault(s). Enumeration Initially, threat actors aim to understand the existing organizations' attack surface. As such, all Azure resources will be enumerated. The scope of this enumeration is determined by the access rights held by the compromised identity. If the compromised identity possesses access comparable to that of a reader or a Key Vault reader at the subscription level (reader permission is included in a variety of Azure RBAC roles), it can read numerous resource groups. Conversely, if the identity's access is restricted, it may only view a specific subset of resources, such as Key Vaults. Consequently, a threat actor can only interact with those Key Vaults that are visible to them. Once the Key Vault name is identified, a threat actor can interact with the Key Vault, and these interactions will be logged within the AzureDiagnostics table. List secrets / List certificates Operation With the Key Vault Name, a threat actor could list secrets or certificates (Operation: SecretList and CertificateList) if they have the appropriate rights (while this is not the final secret, it indicates under which name the secret or certificate can be retrieved). If not, access attempts would appear as unsuccessful operations within the httpStatusCode_d field, aiding in detecting such activities. Therefore, a high number of unauthorized operations on different Key Vaults could be an indicator of suspicious activity as shown in the figure below: The following query assists in detecting potential unauthorized access patterns. Query: AzureDiagnostics | where ResourceType == 'VAULTS' and OperationName != "Authentication" | summarize MinTime = min(TimeGenerated), MaxTime = max(TimeGenerated), OperationCount=count(), UnauthorizedAccess=countif(httpStatusCode_d >= 400), OperationNames = make_set(OperationName), make_set_if(httpStatusCode_d, httpStatusCode_d >= 400), VaultName=make_set(Resource) by CallerIPAddress | where OperationNames has_any ("SecretList", "CertificateList") and UnauthorizedAccess > 0 When a threat actor uses a browser for interaction, the VaultGet operation is usually the first action when accessing a Key Vault. This operation can also be performed via direct API calls and is not limited to browser use. High-Privileged account store Next, we assume a successful attempt to access a global admin password for Entra ID. Analyzing Secret retrieval When an individual has the identifier of a Key Vault and has SecretList and SecretGet access rights, they can list all the secrets stored within the Key Vault (OperationName SecretList). In this instance, this secret includes a password. Upon identifying the secret name, the secret value can be retrieved (OperationName SecretGet). The image below illustrates what appears in the AzureDiagnostics table. The HTTP status code indicates that these actions were successful. The requestUri contains the name of the secret, such as "BreakGlassAccountTenant" for the SecretGet operation. With this information, one can ascertain what secret has been accessed. The requestUri_s format for the SecretGet operation is as follows: {vaultBaseUrl}/secrets/{secret-name}/{secret-version}?api-version=7.4 When the browser accesses the Key Vault service through the Azure portal, additional API calls are often involved due to the various views within the Key Vault services in Azure. The figure below illustrates this process. When someone accesses a specific Key Vault via a browser, the VaultGet operation is followed by SecretList. To further distinguish actions, SecretListVersion will also be used, as the Key Vault service shows different versions of a Secret, which may indicate direct browser usage. The final SecretGet Operation retrieves the actual secret. When using the Key Vault, SecretList operations can be accompanied by SecretGet operations. This is less common for emergency accounts since these accounts are infrequently used. Setting up alerts when certain secrets are retrieved can assist in identifying unusual activity. Entra ID Application certificate store In addition to storing secrets, certificates that provide access to Entra ID applications can also be managed within a Key Vault. When creating an Entra ID application with a certificate for authentication, you can automatically store that certificate within a Key Vault of your choice. Access to such certificates could allow a threat actor to leverage the access rights of the associated Entra ID application and gain access to Entra ID. For instance, if the Entra ID application possesses significant permissions, the extracted certificate could be utilized to exercise those permissions. Various Entra ID roles can be leveraged to elevate privileges; however, for this scenario, we assume the targeted application holds the "RoleManagement.ReadWrite.Directory" permission. Consequently, the Entra ID application would have the capability to assign the Global Admin role to a user account controlled by the threat actor. We have also described this scenario here. Analyzing Certificate retrieval The figure below outlines the procedure for a threat actor to download a certificate and its private key using the Key Vault API. First, the CertificateList operation displays all certificates within a Key Vault. Next, the SecretGet operation retrieves a specific certificate along with its private key (the SecretGet operation is required to obtain both the certificate and its private key). When a threat actor uses the browser through the Azure portal, the sequence of actions should resemble those in the figure below: When a Certificate object is selected within a specific Key Vault view, all certificates are displayed (Operation: CertificateList). Upon selecting a particular certificate in this view, the operations CertificateGet and CertificateListVersions are executed. Subsequently, when a specific version is selected, the CertificateGet operation will be invoked again. When "Download in PFX/PEM format" is selected, the SecretGet Operation downloads the Certificate and private key within the Browser. With the downloaded certificate, the threat actor can sign in as the Entra application and utilize the assigned permissions. Key Vault summary Detecting misuse of a Key Vault instance can be challenging, as operations like SecretGet can be legitimate. A threat actor might easily masquerade their activities among legitimate users. Nevertheless, unusual attributes, such as IP addresses or peculiar access patterns, could serve as indicators. If an identity is known to be compromised and has utilized Key Vaults, the Key Vault logs must be checked to determine what has been accessed to respond appropriately. Coming up next Stay tuned for the next blog in the Cloud Forensics series. If you haven’t already, please read our previous blog about hunting with Microsoft Graph activity logs.Microsoft Incident Response works hand-in-hand with insurers, brokers, and law firms
During a cyberattack, speed and coordination can make all the difference. It's not just about technical expertise; it's about having the right people working together when every second matters. Successful incident response today often means bringing together technical responders, insurers, insurance brokers, and legal experts into a single, focused team. Microsoft Incident Response (IR) fits directly into that framework, delivering containment and recovery services while keeping cyber insurance and legal needs in mind. For decades, Microsoft Incident Response has been on the front lines of some of the world's most complex and high-profile cyber incidents. With direct access to Microsoft's engineering resources and the support of Microsoft Threat Intelligence, Microsoft IR offers unmatched capabilities to organizations navigating a cyber crisis. Comprehensive and coordinated incident response Major insurance carriers like Chubb and Beazley recognize Microsoft IR as an approved incident response vendor. That means when customers file claims, reactive incident response services are often reimbursable - an important reassurance for organizations already facing the financial strain of a costly cyber event. That standing is the result of years of collaboration and consistently strong outcomes for joint customers, making it easier for organizations to move fast when it counts. Insurance brokers play a key role too. Firms like Marsh, Lockton, and Gallagher work closely with customers to include IR services into new and existing policies. Their familiarity with our offerings helps ensure IR can be activated quickly, without unexpected policy hurdles slowing down the response. Legal partners are another crucial piece of the puzzle. Many cyber insurance policies come with pre-appointed law firms to help organizations meet legal compliance obligations and mitigate the risk of lawsuits and regulatory enforcement actions. They also help to protect the legal posture of organizations that are managing cybersecurity incidents. Firms such as Mullen Coughlin, Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete, and Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney have extensive experience partnering with Microsoft IR. Microsoft also partners with a broader network of legal firms beyond formal insurance panels. Firms like Hunton Andrews Kurth, Goodwin, Mayer Brown, and Morrison Foerster, among others, have collaborated with Microsoft to help clients respond swiftly and strategically. Microsoft teams are well-versed in aligning with legal counsel to support regulatory compliance and effective response strategies. By working hand-in-hand with insurers, brokers, and law firms, Microsoft Incident Response helps organizations investigate, contain, and recover from cyber incidents with speed and precision. This coordinated approach doesn't just minimize risk - it also reduces downtime and streamlines the overall recovery process. When the right players are already in place, organizations don't have to waste precious time figuring out the next steps. They know who to call, how to act, and what comes next. Whether customers bring Microsoft IR into their incident response plan directly or through their insurance provider, the goal remains the same: a smooth, confident path to recovery. Learn more Check out the attached datasheet to explore how Microsoft Incident Response teams with industry recognized law firms and leading insurance providers and brokers to help ensure organizations have a streamlined and comprehensive response to cyber incidents.From prevention to recovery: Microsoft Unified’s holistic cybersecurity approach
Author - Paul Saigar The latest Microsoft Digital Defense Report states that 80 percent of organizations have attack paths that expose critical assets. Furthermore, Microsoft has observed a 2.75x increase year over year in ransomware attacks among our customers. Cyber-enabled financial fraud is also rising globally. According to our report, the daily traffic volume for Tech scams – a type of fraud that tricks users by impersonating legitimate services or using fake tech support and ads – has skyrocketed by 400 per cent since 2022. This is a stark contrast to the 180 per cent increase in malware and 30 per cent in phishing over the same period. Microsoft is committed to helping organizations meet this growing challenge with a suite of integrated technologies and services designed to let customers operate with confidence. Microsoft Unified services and the role of Microsoft IR (incident response) Microsoft IR is backed by our elite Detection and Response Team (DART) and is an essential component of Microsoft’s overall cybersecurity offering for customers. This team consists of highly skilled cybersecurity professionals with extensive backgrounds in threat hunting and intelligence, digital forensics and tactical recovery, with experience in handling both proactive and reactive incident response. DART’s approach is twofold: it focuses on immediate incident response and pre-emptive measures to prevent security breaches before they occur. Proactive measures: Microsoft IR, backed by DART, conducts comprehensive assessments of organizational security infrastructures, seeking out vulnerabilities and potential threats. By evaluating the security readiness of identity and endpoint management systems, our DART experts provide customized recommendations to enhance security measures. Reactive strategies: In the event of a cybersecurity incident, DART’s response is swift and effective. The team engages directly with the threat, isolating affected systems to prevent further damage while conducting a thorough analysis to identify the source and nature of the attack. Recovery processes are implemented to restore integrity to the systems and data affected. Throughout the cybersecurity response, our DART experts provide continuous support and updates to ensure stakeholders are informed and prepared for necessary actions. This comprehensive approach is supported by Microsoft’s vast threat intelligence, which analyses 78 trillion security signals daily, and state-of-the-art technologies. That includes proprietary tools and widely recognized solutions such as the Microsoft Defender suite and Microsoft Sentinel. The depth of expertise within DART ensures it is equipped to manage complex cyber threats efficiently, making the team a trusted and vital component of our cybersecurity offering. Expanding Microsoft Unified’s cybersecurity offering Recognizing the critical need for rapid and robust incident management, Microsoft IR, our Cybersecurity Incident Response (CIR) service, is being offered through Microsoft Unified. This offering provides access to our global network of cybersecurity experts, who offer onsite and remote support, ensuring comprehensive coverage and swift action. Our CIR offering also integrates seamlessly with our broader Microsoft Unified framework. Initial contact: Our Unified team serves as the first line of contact for triage and validation of suspected cybersecurity incidents, providing timely and efficient incident isolation and remediation. Escalated response: When an incident escalates beyond initial containment, our CIR team takes comprehensive control, ensuring extensive investigation, containment, and recovery. The suite of services that make up CIR includes prioritized response times, with DART experts available within two hours to address security incidents. It also includes comprehensive services ranging from threat investigation, digital forensics, and malware analysis to complete recovery and remediation efforts. Organizations can also access proactive compromise assessments that delve deep into their environments to unearth vulnerabilities, potential indicators of compromise, potential attack vectors, and inform roadmaps to bolster their defenses. These services are complemented by regular threat intelligence briefings tailored to specific industry and geographical threats to keep organizations informed and prepared. Engage with Microsoft Unified Microsoft Unified provides an indispensable resource for organizations aiming to enhance their cybersecurity readiness. We integrate proactive assessments with rapid, effective incident response capabilities to equip businesses with the necessary tools and expertise to confront and mitigate cyber threats. To learn more about how Microsoft can help protect your organization from cyber threats, visit our Microsoft Unified page. To learn more about Microsoft IR (incident response), please visit Microsoft Incident Response page.
