Aug 24 2017
09:29 AM
- last edited on
Apr 15 2021
11:32 AM
by
TechCommunityAP
Aug 24 2017
09:29 AM
- last edited on
Apr 15 2021
11:32 AM
by
TechCommunityAP
Hello.
This is Yusuke from Redmond.
May I ask some questions?
Q1
What are the enhancement points of Health Services?
Q2
Will Health Services be able to be operated from Server Manager?
Q3
What kind of information will we be able to collect using Time Series or Alerts?
Q4
Are there any requirements for PMEM, such as endurance?
Q5
Will WS2016 support SATA controller for S2D?
Q6
Do you expect to use M.2 devices as data store?
Q7
What is Scoped Spaces?
Q8
What is Marginal Drive Handling?
Q9
What is an expected scenario for Storage Replica DR Simulation?
Q10
Will MSDTC support S2D and CSV?
Thanks
Aug 24 2017 09:34 AM
Q10
Will MSDTC support S2D and CSV?
[RobHind]: Yes, MSDTC will be supported on S2D and CSV - but still requires DHCP capable network in the Fall release.
Aug 24 2017 09:35 AM - edited Aug 24 2017 10:29 AM
Q1
What are the enhancement points of Health Services?
Answer: In the initial release of the Health Service in Windows Server 2016, it was focused on Storage. In the Windows Server, version 1709 release it will be expanded to covering Compute as well. And we will continue to invest and expand the scenarios...
Thanks!
Elden
Aug 24 2017 09:38 AM
Aug 24 2017 09:40 AM
Hello Rob,
Thank you for the answer.
Does "Fall release" mean RS3?
Aug 24 2017 09:42 AM
For Q4
Are there any requirements for PMEM, such as endurance?
There are no Windows Server specific requirements for PMEM as currently available technology (NVDIMM-N) has a high enough req and do not need anything more.
Recently we published a blog on endurance for more information
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/filecab/2017/08/11/understanding-dwpd-tbw/
Aug 24 2017 09:46 AM
Hello Steven,
Thanks for the answers.
Regarding A5, will WS2016RTM support SES controller for S2D?
Or, is RS3 required?
Aug 24 2017 09:46 AM - edited Aug 24 2017 10:36 AM
Q9
What is an expected scenario for Storage Replica DR Simulation?
A: Windows Server, version 1709 gives you the ability to test failover, and mount read-write snapshot on destination which is useful to view contents, test a VM, copy data off, run backups, etc...
Thanks!
Elden
Aug 24 2017 05:09 PM
Q1
What are the enhancement points of Health Services?
[Rob for Cosmos]:
The big two enhancements are:
(a) Better defenses against marginal drives
(b) Improved performance metrics for storage and now for compute!
Aug 24 2017 05:10 PM
Q2
Will Health Services be able to be operated from Server Manager?
[Rob for Cosmos]:
We are working on a graphical experience for the Health Service – stay tuned!
Aug 24 2017 05:12 PM
Q3
What kind of information will we be able to collect using Time Series or Alerts?
[Rob for Cosmos]:
Timeseries collects over 50 total series across Cluster, Server, VM, VHD, Volume, and Drive.
This includes CPU, Memory, storage IOPS, IO latency, IO throughput, and even network and RDMA activity.
The exact series will be published shortly, we’re writing the documentation now!
Aug 24 2017 05:14 PM
Q6
Do you expect to use M.2 devices as data store?
[Rob for Cosmos]:
There is no reason (that I can think of) preventing M.2 devices being used as cache or capacity for the Storage Spaces Direct pool.
We don’t really care about the physical form factor, as long as it speaks NVMe.
However, a consideration would be serviceability – it’s internal and therefore hard to access, and it’s generally not safe to replace without powering down the server.
AFAIK, the main appeal of M.2 is the small size, e.g. for laptops. For servers, I don’t see a clear benefit - but it should work.
Aug 24 2017 05:16 PM
Q8
What is Marginal Drive Handling?
[Rob for Cosmos]:
Documentation on this will be coming soon. In general, we are hardening Storage Spaces Direct with defenses against drives which exhibit too many bad blocks, too many IO errors or retries, or (in next year’s spring update) outlier latency.
After certain (configurable) thresholds are exceeded, we mark the drive as Warning and suggest that the user should consider replacing it.