Nov 05 2021 08:37 PM
Hi @Vinicius Fortes, the RTM/GA release of SharePoint Server Subscription Edition continues to support SharePoint Framework version 1.4.1. Note that the new continuous update model we've adopted for SharePoint Server Subscription Edition gives us the ability to release new feature innovation even after GA, so the SharePoint Framework version we support may change in the future.
Nov 06 2021 10:55 AM
Nov 06 2021 08:49 PM
Hi @Int_A1730, what capabilities in the newer SharePoint Framework versions are you interested in and why do you think they would be important to add to SharePoint Server Subscription Edition? I ask because we have many good ideas for additional improvements we could make to SharePoint Server Subscription Edition from customers, so hearing specifically what you're interested in and why will help us as we prioritize what we focus on.
Nov 11 2021 10:56 PM - edited Nov 11 2021 11:01 PM
1) Tenant wide extensions deployment. We have to do powershell workaround for that or manually upload/uninstall it everywhere.
2) React, Fluent UI, TS versions bump. There are workarounds (https://spblog.net/post/2019/08/08/build-sharepoint-framework-solutions-for-on-premises-sharepoint-w... but it makes solution unnecessarily complicated. PnPjs is popular lib and currently we have to do workaround to install it https://pnp.github.io/pnpjs/SPFx-on-premises/. I don't expect latest and greatest versions, I understand that onprem is always behind.
Nov 11 2021 11:22 PM
Thanks @Int_A1730, this is great feedback and I appreciate the explanation of why you're looking for newer versions of SharePoint Framework. We'll think about this as we plan our future investments in SharePoint Server Subscription Edition.
Nov 18 2021 01:01 AM
Dec 15 2021 03:32 AM
I am really surprised that anyone needs to be asked why they would want to use a newer version of SPFx. The question should be why not? Cloud dependencies and whatnot is not a valid excuse. Many organisations will continue to use on prem option for the foreseeable future and are being severely handicapped when it comes to development. I am a developer in one such organisation and am constantly disappointed by how poorly thought out SP19 was and am even more disappointed that a product you are releasing 3 years later uses exactly the same SPFx version. From a developer perspective SP SE is basically SP19 on subscription.
I think any developer worth their salt can be trusted to work out what they can and can't do with the newer versions on SPFx within an on prem environment, so give us the flexibility please!
Jan 07 2022 01:27 AM
Hi @sharepointWoes, happy New Year! Thanks for your feedback. I hope you don't interpret my question to mean that we don't believe newer versions of SPFx have value. We ask questions like this to better understanding customer needs when they request new or improved features. If we don't engage with customers and ask questions to better understand their needs, we could make incorrect assumptions about why they're requesting a feature and end up prioritize the wrong set of investments.
We agree that many organizations continue to need SharePoint Server for the foreseeable future. I hope you'll continue to share your feedback with us as we turn our focus to the post-RTM improvements we want to make to SharePoint Server Subscription Edition.
Mar 02 2022 10:14 PM
Mar 03 2022 11:46 PM
We've received many feedbacks from customers regarding SFPx, and we are actively looking at this request. But it's not in a stage that we can share information publicly regarding it now. If you want know more, please shot me a message and we will work out how to share more information with you.
Mar 04 2022 04:55 AM
Mar 05 2022 05:48 PM
Mar 24 2022 07:12 PM
@Steve Zhang I work for a large integrator that is internally tied to both on-prem SharePoint and SPO, and support large agencies who face the same obstacles. This is not a small problem. Would welcome any information on how Microsoft is working to address the version differences with SPFx.
Mar 29 2022 07:22 AM
Mar 30 2022 05:08 AM
Mar 30 2022 05:09 AM
Mar 30 2022 06:26 AM
Mar 30 2022 06:32 AM
Hi @AkumaTen
Thank you very much for your response for the detail requirements!
They are very valuable for us to understand what is indeed needed.
Looking forward for your discussion result.
Thanks
Steve
Jul 26 2022 12:32 AM