Apr 07 2021 09:59 AM
We could really use the ability to flag or designate a task assignee as the "owner" of the task. Mainly for visibility, reporting, etc. To take it a step further, it would be great if that user could have permissions that non-owners don't have -- like the ability to edit a due date, or other task details. Thanks for listening!
Apr 07 2021 10:21 AM
Apr 07 2021 10:25 AM
Apr 07 2021 11:25 AM - edited Apr 07 2021 11:27 AM
@Si Meng: Mainly I'd like to be able to simply "designate" an assignee (or assignees) as the "owner"... in our world, this is the person "accountable" for the task; multiple people may work on it, but ultimately the task's completion is this person's responsibility, and we would like to be able to report on that for our various metrics. Allowing these users to have different permissions than the regular "assignees" would be icing on the cake... because then we could have better control over who can edit the details of a task -- most importantly the due date. Right now, anyone can edit a due date, and given there is no audit trail for that, we can't really have accurate reporting to tell us how we are meeting our initial completion goals.
And YES -- it would definitely be helpful if task creators were notified that their tasks were edited (and what edits were made). And if we could designate a task "owner" -- it would be best if they were notified, because in our world, the creator may simply be the administrator of the plan... and not really the person responsible for the task.
Hope that helps!
Jun 18 2021 02:57 AM
I think you should just go all-in and have a RASIC based id for those assigned to a task. It is being used for project management after all.
Jul 13 2021 06:12 AM