Home

Direct calendar booking across multiple mailboxes

Highlighted
Contributor

First off I know direct booking is bad and that wherever possible the use of free / busy scheduling should be used.

 

I have observed a number of our executive assistants who manage the calendar and meetings of senior executives co-ordinate the diaries of up to 12 people. They are currently using Outlook 2010 and move in and out of various calendars sometimes maintaining a side by side view of all 12 calendars and managing direct booking of the executives.

 

Migrating the users to Office365 we have placed the executives into hybrid cache mode as we also update the client to Outlook 2016. The executive assistants are complaining of slowness in moving between calendars, updating and deleting appoitments. Their own mailboxes are in cache mode but we have disabled caching all the various executives as shared folders, so accessing shared folders is done online.

 

Reproducing the practice on a test setup "feels" like the additional Calendar sessions are timing out and the renegotiation of the session is what is leading to the slow performance. For example staying within a single mailbox calendar and creating one appointment after another doesn't seem to lag. But this isn't really how they work across the calendars as they dip in and out during the day.

 

Can anyone point me in the direction of how the HTTP sessions "stay alive" and whether or not this can be configured to keep it alive for longer? Another other suggestins of how to improve the overall end client experience in the scenario I have described?

 

Many thanks

 

Paul

5 Replies
Highlighted
I am seeing some of the same issues with our Exchange 2016 CUx infrastructure and users who manage multiple calendars.. we also see occasional slowdowns/not respondings when we have clients in online mode. I have an active case with MS open trying ro trackdown our issue.
Highlighted

@Matt Karel thanks for sharing, I'd be interested in what Premier find and suggest. I might do the same if not further feedback here. What are the average response times you are seeing?

 

Our tenant is in Ireland and the users being most vocal are located in Hong Kong, the average response time is around 600ms.

 

Paul

Highlighted

@Matt Karel any update on your case with Microsoft? Even if you could share the troubleshooting steps to date. Calendaring remains our number one compliant for migrated users

Highlighted
Sorry, things have been crazy. As of right now we are looking at this from the Exchange side of things. We are seeing some performance issues and network issues on the backend that could be contributing to some if not all of our users. We ran an 11hr Perf collection on our 4 Exchange Servers an we saw several things that may be causing us some pain
some of the things we are addressing are:
- Page File Sizes (32GB Max)
-TCP Reset windows on the server and our load balancers
-ensuring the Exchange servers don't have more then 96GB of Ram
-Removing our NIC Team and going to a single Nic on each server
-Updating Drivers and Firmware (Bios, Storage Ctrl, Drives)

once all these changes are made this month, we plan to run another 11hr perf collection to see if things have improved.
Highlighted

Paul,

I dont know if our issue s are exactly the same as we are seeing perf issues when opening mail, caledar and other activites within Outoook. At this point we think the issue is somewere within the MAPI/HTTP stack in IIS or Windows but more debugging would be necessarry to see and we dont have the hours to burn. We have found that if we move the user from using MAPI/HTTP to connect to their mailbox to use RPC/HTTP the issues seem to be resolved.  I would sugesst that you try the same. to do this with in powershell enter Set-CasMailbox -Identity "user Alias" -MapiHttpEnabled $False

if you find that this helps your issue please if you can open a ticket with Microsoft and ref SR 116102414841137

 

Thanks

Related Conversations