Having issues with reoccurring tasks

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2959417%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHaving%20issues%20with%20reoccurring%20tasks%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2959417%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20having%20an%20issue%20with%20with%20reoccurring%20tasks%20and%20when%20they%20are%20recreated.%26nbsp%3B%20For%20example%2C%20let's%20suppose%20I%20have%20a%20task%20due%20on%20Monday.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20set%20the%20task%20to%20reoccur%20weekly%2C%20every%20Monday.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20I%20get%20it%20done%20on%20Monday%2C%20it%20recreates%20the%20next%20one%20on%20the%20following%20Monday.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20far%20so%20good.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBut%20let's%20say%20I%20don't%20get%20to%20it%20until%20Wednesday.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20check%20it%20off%2C%20but%20instead%20of%20recreating%20the%20task%20next%20Monday%20like%20it%20should%2C%20it%20recreates%20it%20next%20Wednesday%2C%20a%20week%20after%20it%20was%20completed.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20is%20causing%20all%20of%20my%20reoccurring%20tasks%20to%20move%20around%20if%20i%20don't%20complete%20it%20the%20day%20its%20do%20and%20creating%20a%20lot%20confusion.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAm%20I%20missing%20something%20on%20my%20end%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20this%20working%20as%20intended%3F%20Or%20is%20this%20a%20bug%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Visitor

I'm having an issue with with reoccurring tasks and when they are recreated.  For example, let's suppose I have a task due on Monday.  I set the task to reoccur weekly, every Monday.  If I get it done on Monday, it recreates the next one on the following Monday.  So far so good.

 

But let's say I don't get to it until Wednesday.  I check it off, but instead of recreating the task next Monday like it should, it recreates it next Wednesday, a week after it was completed.  This is causing all of my reoccurring tasks to move around if i don't complete it the day its do and creating a lot confusion.

 

Am I missing something on my end?  Is this working as intended? Or is this a bug?

0 Replies