SOLVED

Using Teams to Replace Skype

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-53848%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EUsing%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-53848%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20There%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20having%20trouble%20figuring%20out%20how%20to%20use%20Teams%20as%20my%20only%20client%20and%20shut%20down%20Skype.%20I%20know%20that%20if%20I%20do%20not%20have%20Skype%20running%20I%20will%20get%20the%20notifications%20in%20Teams.%20But%20I%20only%20want%201%20client.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20my%20first%20big%20question%20is%20how%20do%20I%20send%20a%20message%20to%20a%20Skype%20user%20from%20Teams%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-53848%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-363559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-363559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20the%20clarification%2C%20but%20you%20are%20assuming%20that%20a%20'Team'%20of%20people%20is%20only%20a%20subset%20of%20an%20organization.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20am%20a%20sole%20trader%20working%20in%20a%20very%20collaborative%20environment%20so%20my%20'teams'%20always%20consist%20of%20people%20across%20organizations.%26nbsp%3B%20Statements%20like%20MS%20Teams%20is%20for%20'within%20the%20team'%20and%20skype%20is%20for%20'beyond%20the%20team'%20shows%20you%20have%20a%20blinkered%20view%20of%20how%20people%20work.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-358071%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-358071%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EChris%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESorry%2C%20I%20am%20super%20embarrassed%20I%20didn't%20see%20your%20response!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EYour%20question%20leads%20me%20to%20believe%20you%20already%20suspect%20my%20answer%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20We%20already%20owned%20Office%202010%2C%20so%20financially%20it%20didn't%20make%20sense%20to%20provide%20E3%20to%20tens%20of%20thousands%20of%20information%20workers%20with%20dedicated%20PCs.%20So%2C%20we%20started%20with%20E1%2C%20and%20only%20upgrade%20to%20E3%20as%20we%20systematically%20upgrade%20users%20to%20Win10%2C%20which%20we%20pair%20with%20O365%20ProPlus%2C%20shifting%20users%20with%20dedicated%20PCs%20to%20M365%20E3.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20a%20result%2C%20for%20our%20Win7%20users%2C%20the%20only%20S4B%20client%20available%20is....%20S4B%20Basic.%20Let%20me%20tell%20you%2C%20this%20Basic%20client%20has%20some%20serious%20limitations%20-%20no%20support%20for%20calendar%20delegation!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJosh%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-357954%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-357954%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20piloting%20Microsoft%20365%20and%20need%20to%20get%20voice%20figured%20out.%20I%20just%20attended%20the%20local%20Technical%20Summit%20at%20which%20I%20was%20informed%20that%20voice%20is%20already%20in%20teams%20as%20long%20as%20you%20have%20a%20Microsoft%20dialing%20plan.%20It%20looks%20like%20this%20is%20%3CEM%3Emaybe%3C%2FEM%3E%20true%20IF%20you%20are%20a%20enterprise%20user%3B%20I%20am%20not.%20I%20would%20rather%20go%20directly%20to%20Teams%20but%20there%20seems%20to%20be%20little%20if%20any%20step%20by%20step%20documentation%20on%20this%20so%20given%20that%20you%20have%20some%20services%2Fsolutions%20in%20this%20area%20maybe%20you%20could%20provide%20some%20insights.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-294410%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-294410%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENot%20sure%20if%20this%20will%20be%20relevant%20at%20this%20stage%20but%20we%20have%20built%20a%20Microsoft-certified%20Cloud%20Connector%20that%20delivers%20voice%20services%20for%20Teams%20calling%20directly%20to%20the%20O365%20Tenant.%20Our%20geo-redundant%20solution%20also%20completes%20the%20missing%20PBX%20and%20legacy%20feature-set%2C%20provides%20full%20integration%20capabilities%20to%20Call%2FContact%20Centers%20and%20CRMs%20and%20handles%20extension%20dialing%2C%20DID%20%2FTF%20number%20porting%2C%20as%20we%20are%20a%20Tier1%20Cloud%20UC%20carrier.%20Our%20cloud%20dial-plan%20allows%20for%20legacy%20PBX%20or%20Skype4B%20to%20Teams%20extension%20dialing%20during%20migration%20as%20well.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-241212%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-241212%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENot%20trying%20to%20be%20snarky%2C%20but%20someone%26nbsp%3Bmight%20want%20to%20inform%26nbsp%3BMicrosoft%20about%20this.%20From%20their%20documentation%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%22%3CSPAN%3EAs%20an%20existing%20Skype%20for%20Business%20customer%2C%20you%E2%80%99re%20invited%20to%20upgrade%20to%20Microsoft%20Teams%2C%20to%20experience%20this%20full%20suite%20of%20communication%20and%20collaboration%20capabilities%20in%20a%20single%20client%20experience.%22%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fjourney-skypeforbusiness-teams%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fjourney-skypeforbusiness-teams%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E(Jul.%2015%2C%202018)%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-227562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-227562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHI%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20already%20in%20the%20process%20to%20move%20Lync%202013%20on%20premise%20users%20to%20Skype%20for%20business%20online.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENow%20the%20question%20is%20that%20can%20i%20just%20move%20the%20users%20to%20SFB%20online%20first%20from%20on%20premise%20then%20i%20can%20move%20them%20to%20Teams%20later%20on.What%20would%20be%20the%20good%20approach%3Fas%20i%20can%20already%20see%20teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20business%20are%20together%20in%20O365%20Admin%20center.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-211209%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-211209%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ERight%2C%20one%20more%20thing.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFor%20your%20Office%202010%20client%20PCs%2C%20did%20you%20end%20up%20using%20the%20Basic%20SFB%20or%202016%20SFB%20client%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-211204%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-211204%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20is%20a%20challenging%20situation.%20We%20are%20using%20Skype%20in%20conjunction%20with%20Office%202010.%20It%20is%20not%20an%20ideal%20situation.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20asked%20Microsoft%20for%20a%20feature%20that%20lets%20a%20user%20CONVERT%20their%20Skype%20meetings%20into%20Teams%20Meetings%20when%20they%20are%20upgraded%20to%20Teams%20Only.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-211200%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-211200%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Josh%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20really%20appreciate%20the%20response.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAnother%20reason%20I%20want%20to%20move%20off%20SFB%20is%20that%20the%20client%20does%20not%20play%20well%20with%20Office%202013%20installed%2C%20hence%20the%20pure%20Teams%20route.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20did%20open%20a%20ticket%20with%20MS%2C%20but%20they%20advised%20that%20there%20would%20be%20no%20issues%20using%20a%20disparite%20client%20in%20a%20meeting%20but%20obviously%20this%20does%20not%20work.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESounds%20like%20there%20is%20no%20getting%20out%20of%20using%20SFB%20when%20the%20organiser%20has%20instigated%20it%20in%20this%20format.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-211193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-211193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYou%20must%20use%20Skype%20to%20join%20Skype%20Meetings%20and%20Teams%20to%20join%20Teams%20Meetings.%20With%20Islands%20mode%20the%20two%20solutions%20run%20totally%20independent.%20When%20you%20go%20Teams%20only%20mode%20the%20interop%20improves%2C%20but%20not%20for%20Meetings.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFor%20us%2C%20we%20will%20move%20the%20org%20to%20Teams%20only%20and%20keep%20the%20Skype%20client%20on%20the%20PC%20just%20to%20join%20meetings%20that%20were%20created%20in%20Skype%20(all%20our%20execs%20have%20their%20meetings%20planned%203-15%20months%20in%20advance...).%20At%20the%20end%20of%202019%20we%20will%20remove%20Skype%20from%20the%20PC.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-211190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-211190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EJust%20picking%20up%20on%20this%20thread.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20too%20want%20to%20shutdown%20the%20use%20of%20Skype%20For%20Business%20in%20my%20organisation%20and%20move%20to%20Teams%20exclusively.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHowever%2C%20during%20testing%20I%20have%20not%20been%20able%20to%20get%20the%20SFB%20client%20to%20join%20a%20meeting%20organised%20by%20a%20MS%20Teams%20user%20and%20vice%20versa.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAt%20the%20backend%2C%20the%20I%20set%20co-existence%20to%20Islands%20mode%20but%20I%20still%20have%20no%20joy.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBy%20the%20way%2C%20with%20OWA%2C%20are%20there%20plans%20to%20update%20the%20SFB%20icon%20with%20the%20Teams%20one%20at%20some%20point%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-194395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-194395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20using%20both%20Skype%20and%20Teams%2C%20I%20have%20had%20no%20issues%20with%20Teams%20%2C%20even%20with%20conferencing%20both%20audio%20and%20video.%20Most%20of%20these%20are%20with%20external%20people.%20I%20have%20Teams%20set%20up%20for%20various%20projects%20and%20include%20the%20third%20parties%20in%20them%20so%20everybody%20is%20kept%20up%20to%20date%20and%20have%20to%20say%2C%20the%20video%20conference%20part%20is%20far%20superior%20than%20any%20I%20had%20used%20before.%20Even%20the%20mix%20of%20some%20video%20and%20some%20audio(usually%20because%20they%20have%20poor%20internet%20connection)%20works%20very%20well%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-183011%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-183011%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EJoseph%2C%20this%20is%20an%20old%20thread%2C%20Teams%20now%20supports%20both%20guests%20and%20people%20joining%20individual%20meetings%20who%20are%20anonymous.%20If%20you've%20turned%20on%20the%20ability%20to%20use%20Teams%20for%20meetings%20you%20can%20create%20a%20meeting%20in%20a%20channel%2C%20or%20schedule%20one%20through%20outlook.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYour%20guests%20can%20join%20using%20Edge%20for%20a%20full%20video%20experience%2C%20Chrome%20for%20audio%20and%20screen%20only%2C%20or%20install%20the%20Teams%20desktop%20app%20on%20Mac%20or%20PC%20for%20full%20experience%20(no%20need%20to%20log%20in%20for%20he%20anonymous%20join%20to%20work).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20you%20invite%20them%20to%20your%20channel%20they%20can%20log%20in%20using%20their%20email%20as%20a%20Microsoft%20Account%2C%20then%20join%20your%20chats%2C%20file%20sharing%20and%20meetings%20as%20well.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-182977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-182977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20seems%20we%20have%20nothing%20to%20use%20right%20now.%20I%20cant%20even%20use%20Skype%3F%3F%20There's%20no%20way%20to%20setup%20video%20calls%20in%20teams%3F%20All%20of%20the%20people%20I%20work%20with%20have%20their%20own%20emails%20outside%20of%20the%20organization.%20I%20need%20to%20have%20meetings%20with%20people%20outside%20of%20the%20organization.%20I%20hope%20Microsoft's%20Teams%20becomes%20Skype%20or%20a%20%22GoToMeeting%22%26nbsp%3Bservice%20for%20anyone%20(outside%20organization%20or%20in)!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-134540%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-134540%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20following%20and%20advising%20customer%20UC%20and%2For%20Microsoft%20since%20the%20OCS%20days.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EFor%20me%20Skype%20is%20going%20from%20a%20majority%20of%201-1%20communications%20with%20easy%20escalations%20to%20a%20group.%20Now%20there%20is%20teams%20which%20is%20focussed%20on%20(larger)%20groups.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20know%20there%20is%20a%20roadmap%20to%20take%20all%20Skype%20online%20functionalities%20towards%20teams%2C%20which%20will%20take%20plus%20one%20year%20and%20not%20even%20the%20more%20advance%20communications%20will%20be%20included.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20am%20afraid%20of%20the%20following%3A%20items%20not%20working%20anymore%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20(federation%2C%20videoconferencing%2C%20desktopsharing%2C%20file%20transfer%20etc).%20A%20lot%20of%20investment%20need%20to%20be%20made%20into%20adoption%20of%20a%20new%20client.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELess%20support%20of%20Skype%20for%20Business%202019.%20If%20i%20look%20at%20the%20roadmap%20announcement%20at%20Ignite%2C%20only%20items%20i%20see%20is%20removal%20of%20silverlight%20and%20some%20connection%20to%20O365%20dashboards.%20I%20am%20just%20not%20getting%20why%20trying%20to%20port%20a%2013%20years%20product%20towards%20something%20completely%20new%20(1year).%20Too%20difficult%20to%20manage%20Skype%20Online%3F%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20know%20there%20is%20room%20for%20team%20communications.%20Funny%20part%20is%20that%20persistant%20chat%20never%20took%20off%20on%20Lync%202010%2F2013%20and%20Skype.%20It%20was%20supposed%20to%20be%20used%20in%26nbsp%3Bthe%20financial%20area%2C%20but%20my%20last%20customer%20was%20an%20international%20bank%20and%20they%20did%20not%20use%20it.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20I%20look%20at%20my%20majority%20of%20clients%20with%205000%2B%20users%20they%20should%20stay%20on%20Skype%20for%20Business%20On-premise%20or%20actually%20in%20most%20of%20the%20cases%20still%20in%20the%20proces%20of%20migrating%20away%20from%20the%20old%20PBX-es%2C%20Analogue%20connections%2C%20PZI%20integrations%2C%20Video%20integrations%2C%20Contact%20Center%20integration%2C%20Voice%20recording%20etc.%20All%20those%20items%20are%20already%20difficult%20for%20Skype%20On-Premise%2C%26nbsp%3Bimpossible%20for%20people%20going%20to%20the%20Cloud.%20Why%20even%20consider%20Hybrids.%20So%20Microsoft%20is%20focusing%20on%20their%20Cloud-First%20initiative%20because%20it's%20in%20their%20benefit%2C%20I%20see%20little%20benefit%20for%20the%20customers%20(note%3A%20just%20the%20Skype%20for%20Business%20workload%2C%20the%20rest%20is%20has%20a%20better%20business%20case).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIn%20the%20meantime%20Microsoft%20should%20deliver%20on%20their%20cloud%20roadmap%20and%20also%20fully%20invest%20in%20the%20On-Premise%20product.%20Otherwise%20there%20will%20be%20an%20opportunity%20again%20for%20Cisco%2C%20Avaya%2C%20Mitel%20etc.%20to%20take%20over%20again%20in%20the%20UC%20space.%20Cisco%20has%20already%20passed%20Microsoft%20in%20the%20Gartner%20MQ%20for%20UC.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-114374%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-114374%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPlease%20%2C%20Do%20not%20hold%20your%20breath%20waiting%20on%20clear%20details.%20I%20think%20the%20automatic%20enabling%20caught%20a%20lot%20of%20Admins%20by%20surprise.%20I%20have%20turned%20off%20Teams%20until%20we%20can%20determine%20how%20the%20interaction%20with%20Groups%2C%20SharePoint%2C%20OneDrive%20are%20securely%20managed.%20We%20already%20had%20lots%20of%20problems%20with%20people%20creating%20custom%20share%20invitations%20breaking%20our%20SharePoint%20security.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-112159%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-112159%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWell%20worth%20checking%20the%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-gb%2FMicrosoftTeams%2Ffaq-journey%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EFAQ%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20along%20with%20the%20other%20resources%2C%20if%20you%20haven't%20seen%20it%20yet.%26nbsp%3B%20It%20mentions%2C%20amongst%20other%20things%2C%26nbsp%3BInbound%20and%20outbound%20calls%20to%20PSTN%20numbers%2C%20as%20well%20as%20basic%20calling%20features%20(hold%2C%20call%20transfer%2C%20speed%20dial%2C%20voicemail)%20are%20to%20be%20added%20plus%20support%20for%20USB%20%26amp%3B%20IP%20phone%20hardware.%26nbsp%3B%20Also%2C%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Faudio-conferencing%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Eaudio%20conferencing%3C%2FA%3E%20is%20being%20added%26nbsp%3Bto%20Microsoft%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20There%20is%20a%20roadmap%20update%20due%20in%20October%20for%20Teams%2C%20that%20might%26nbsp%3Badd%20some%20further%20clarity.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-112149%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-112149%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWhat%20is%20the%20most%20appropriate%20response%20now%20that%20it%20has%20been%20announced%20the%20teams%20will%20%22take%20over%22%20for%20S4B%3F%20I%20heard%20that%20we%20will%20be%20setting%20up%20and%20taking%20phone%20calls%20using%20Skype%20but%20am%20not%20sure%20where%20info%20is%20for%20the%20path%20forward.%20I%20also%20read%20that%20there%20will%20be%20the%20ability%20to%20call%20in%20via%20regular%20phone%20(without%20needing%20special%20PBX%20PSTN%20add-ons).%20Any%20news%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104804%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20I%20have%20seen%20this%20in%20a%20couple%20of%20tenants%20so%20it%20seems%20Microsoft%20is%20already%20rolling%20out%20something...I%20was%20worried%20about%20the%20fact%20that%20external%20users%20had%20already%20access%20to%20my%20Teams%2C%20but%20I%20checked%20that's%20not%20the%20case...I%20hope%20they%20release%20both%20private%20channels%20and%20external%20guests%20support%20at%20the%20same%20time%20or%20at%20least%20provide%20granular%20controls%20for%20guests%20users%20at%20the%20Team%20Level%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104646%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104646%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYou%20are%20right%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1292%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20but%20this%20morning%20we%20got%20a%20message%20in%20all%20our%20Teams%20based%20on%20O365%20Groups%20that%20already%20had%20externals%20in%20them%2C%20that%20the%20externals%20were%20added%20in%20the%20Team.%20So%2C%20I%20think%20something%20happened%20today%2C%20maybe%20it%20was%20possible%20before%2C%20and%20it%20is%20a%20little%20bug%2C%20but%20the%20message%20was%20an%20issue.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAgain%2C%20MS%20PG%20contacted%20me%20(appreciated)%20and%20I%20know%20it%20will%20be%20addressed.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104645%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104645%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYou%20are%20right%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1292%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20but%20this%20morning%20we%20got%20a%20message%20in%20all%20our%20Teams%20based%20on%20O365%20Groups%20that%20already%20had%20externals%20in%20them%2C%20that%20the%20externals%20were%20added%20in%20the%20Team.%20So%2C%20I%20think%20something%20happened%20today%2C%20maybe%20it%20was%20possible%20before%2C%20and%20it%20is%20a%20little%20bug%2C%20but%20the%20message%20was%20an%20issue.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAgain%2C%20MS%20PG%20contacted%20me%20(appreciated)%20and%20I%20know%20it%20will%20be%20addressed.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104512%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104512%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F16384%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Josh%20Sullins%3C%2FA%3ETeams%20is%20built%20on%20groups%2C%20groups%20allow%20guest%20access%2C%20that's%20what%20you%20are%20seeing%20and%20has%20been%20there%20since%20the%20start.%20It's%20useful%20to%20know%20that%20when%20uploading%20a%20file%20using%20Teams%20that%20this%20might%20be%20seen%20by%20a%20guest%20accessing%20SharePoint.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGuest%20access%20to%20Teams%20conversation%20is%20coming%2C%20it's%20been%20talked%20about%20on%20the%20roadmap%20for%20a%20long%20time%2C%20and%20I'm%20sure%20we'll%20get%20all%20the%20details%20about%20it%20at%20Ignite.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104504%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104504%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20getting%20some%20private%20messages%20basically%20implying%20people%20don't%20believe%20me%20when%20I%20say%20external%20access%20is%20half-turned-on%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EScreenshots.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20563px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F19814iE463016D1C56A591%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20title%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F19813i16EFD0D38C131B1A%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20title%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EUPDATE%3A%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSTRONG%3EMicrosoft%20Product%20Group%20contacted%20me%20on%20this.%20It%20was%20a%20small%20mistake.%20It%20only%20impacts%20users%20that%20were%20in%20Azure%20AD%20already%2C%20not%20%22new%22%20external%20guest%20users.%20It%20still%20fails%2C%20but%20it%20seems%20this%20will%20be%20fixed%20soon.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EToday%2C%20we%20have%20another%20surprise.%20You%20can%20add%20external%20guest%20users%20-%20but%20it%20doesn't%20work%20after%20you%20add%20them.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20external%20guest%20gets%20an%20email%20saying%20they've%20been%20added%2C%20but%20when%20they%20try%20to%20get%20in%2C%20it%20fails...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104496%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104496%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ESame%20for%20us.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EFor%20testing%20purposes%2C%20we%20have%20multiple%20O365%20tenants.%20%26nbsp%3BThis%20message%20appeared%20in%20all%20of%20them%20today.%20%26nbsp%3BWithin%20an%20hour%2C%20all%20of%20the%20messages%20were%20gone.%20%26nbsp%3BOooops.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104370%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104370%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIt's%20a%20pity%20the%20additional%20information%20link%20goes%20nowhere.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104367%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104367%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI've%20got%20that%20message%20in%20the%20Admin%20center%20too%20but%20no%20other%20sign%20of%20it%2C%20and%20hope%20this%20is%20one%20of%20their%20crazy%20ideas%20that%20doesn't%20come%20to%20pass!%3F!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104360%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104360%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENow%20confirmed%20-%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%22%3CEM%3EWe're%20upgrading%20Skype%20for%20Business%20to%20Microsoft%20Teams.%20This%20will%20take%20us%20some%20time%20to%20complete.%20For%20now%2C%20this%20is%20an%20opt-in%20experience%2C%20as%20we%20continue%20to%20work%20on%20enhancing%20the%20Microsoft%20Teams%20experience.%3C%2FEM%3E%22%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20847px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F19789iD9DE97FAE31E25AF%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22We're%20upgrading%20Skype%20for%20Business%20to%20Microsoft%20Teams.png%22%20title%3D%22We're%20upgrading%20Skype%20for%20Business%20to%20Microsoft%20Teams.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104260%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104260%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20story%20got%20picked%20up%20by%26nbsp%3BMary%20Jo%20Foley%20-%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zdnet.com%2Farticle%2Fmicrosoft-may-be-repositioning-some-or-all-of-skype-for-business-as-teams%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EMicrosoft%20may%20be%20repositioning%20some%20(or%20all)%20of%20Skype%20for%20Business%20as%20Teams%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bpointing%20to%20this%20very%20thread%2C%20that%20answers%20some%20of%20the%20questions%20many%20of%20us%20had.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%22%3CEM%3EA%20number%20of%20Office%20365%20users%20received%20a%20big%20surprise%20today%20when%20trying%20to%20log%20onto%20Skype%20for%20Business%3C%2FEM%3E.%22%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104160%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104160%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20agree%20with%20the%20frustration.%20This%20cannot%20be%20done%20this%20way%2C%20i%20haven't%20really%20understood%20that%20this%20was%20going%20to%20happen%20and%20i%20don't%20see%20any%20information%20about%20this%20change.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20creating%20a%20lot%20of%20confusion%20since%20we%20have%20disabled%20teams%20up%20until%20we%20can%20figure%20out%20how%20that%20space%20can%20interact%20(if)%20with%20our%20way%20of%20working%20which%20now%20consists%20of%20mainly%20yammer%20for%20social%20collaboration.%20Yes%2C%20I%20understand%20the%20advantages%20of%20teams%20but%20we%20are%20trying%20to%20avoid%20too%20much%20confusion%20too%20early.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EMicrosoft%2C%20this%20is%20extremely%20unfortunate%20and%20badly%20implemented%2Finformed.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104147%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104147%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EMicrosoft%20can't%20really%20do%20this%20until%20they%20have%20external%20guest%20access%20and%20federation%20working%20for%20Teams.%20My%20users%20of%20Skype%20Online%20(through%20OWA)%20cannot%20contact%20externals...%20It%20is%20impacting%20my%20Service%20Desk.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EUPDATE%3A%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSTRONG%3EMicrosoft%20recognized%20this%20was%20a%20little%20mistake.%20It%20is%20fixed.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104145%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104145%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWe%20have%20the%20same%20issue%20(large%20manufacturing%20MNC).%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104144%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104144%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20agree%20-%20I%20am%20all%20for%20MS%20Teams.%20We%20love%20it%2C%20but%20this%20was%20an%20unwelcome%20surprise%20on%20many%20levels.%20MS%20owes%20its%20customers%20an%20explanation%20QUICKLY.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104141%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104141%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENico%2C%20I%20found%20your%20article%20helpful%20with%20more%20background%20info%20-%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sharepointrelated.com%2F2017%2F09%2F07%2Foffice-365-mail-pushing-microsoft-teams%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EOffice%20365%20Mail%20pushing%20Microsoft%20Teams%3C%2FA%3E.%26nbsp%3B%20Sounds%20like%20this%20is%20(was%3F)%20just%20a%20temporary%20glitch%20but%26nbsp%3Bwe%20can%20read%20more%20into%20if%26nbsp%3Bwant%20to%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104136%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104136%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESame%20for%20us%20(French%20users)%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3EA%20bit%20confusing%20as%20we%20have%20some%20users%20fully%20online%20and%20for%20whom%20we%20can't%20let%20them%20without%20Skype%20IM...%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAnswer%20awaited%20with%20a%20huge%20restlessness...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104125%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104125%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe've%20also%20seen%20this%3F%20Does%20anyone%20know%20if%20it's%20reversable%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20I%20understand%20Teams%20isn't%20a%20replacement%20for%20Skype%20so%20this%20feels%20wrong.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%2FThomas%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104114%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104114%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20is%20going%20to%20confuse%20lots%20of%20folks!%20Is%20this%20really%20just%20an%20advert%20for%20Microsoft%20Teams%20and%20a%20nudge%20for%20those%20users%20to%20check%20out%20Teams%2C%20or%20something%20else%3F%20Either%20way%2C%20it%20seems%20poorly%20worded%20and%20out%20of%20place.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-104089%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-104089%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHmm%2C%20I'm%20not%20so%20sure%20anymore%2C%20after%20seeing%20this%20in%20my%20Office%20365%20tenant%3A%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20995px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F19730i1B6227651272A0B6%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Teams_integration_office365_mail.PNG%22%20title%3D%22Teams_integration_office365_mail.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-53915%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-53915%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThat's%20right.%20The%20IM%20%2F%20Calls%20%2F%20Meetings%20are%20for%20enriching%20the%20real-time%20collaboration%20within%20the%20Team.%20Skype%20extends%20beyond%20the%20Team.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-53881%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-53881%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAnd%20by%20the%20way%2C%20Teams%20is%20not%20aimed%20to%20replace%20Skype%20for%20Business%20or%20any%20other%20collaboration%20tool%20in%20the%20Office%20365%20ecosystem...the%20scenario%20you%20have%20just%20described%20is%20a%20good%20example.%20Teams%20is%20not%20designed%20as%20an%20IM%20solution%20to%20work%20with%20both%20organizational%20and%20not%20organizational%20users%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-53858%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-53858%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Mike.%20You'll%20still%20need%20Skype%20(for%20Business)%20for%20online%20meetings%20and%20calls%20with%20people%20outside%20your%20organization.%20You%20can%20hold%20a%20meeting%20within%20your%20org%20using%20Microsoft%20Teams%2C%20but%20attendees%20will%20need%20to%20be%20members%20of%20the%20team.%20Teams%20meetings%20have%20a%20limit%20of%2080%20attendees.%20You%20can%20share%20your%20screen%20in%20a%20Teams%20meeting.%20But%20if%20your%20org%20is%20in%20the%20practice%20of%20recording%20meetings%2C%20this%20feature%20isn't%20available%20in%20Teams%20yet.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20for%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Interop%3C%2FP%3E%3CUL%3E%3CLI%3EInteroperability%20between%20Microsoft%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20is%20currently%20available%20for%20peer%20to%20peer%20(P2P)%20instant%20messaging%20%3CSTRONG%3Eonly%3C%2FSTRONG%3E.%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EFor%20a%20Microsoft%20Teams%20user%20to%20send%20an%20IM%20to%20a%20Skype%20for%20Business%20user%2C%20the%20Microsoft%20Teams%20user%20must%20be%20enabled%20with%20their%20account%20%3CSTRONG%3Ehomed%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Online%3C%2FSTRONG%3E.%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EIncoming%20Skype%20for%20Business%20messages%20can%20be%20responded%20to%20on%20the%20Microsoft%20Teams%20client%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FUL%3E%3CP%3E-%20%22Plan%2C%20Deliver%20and%20Operate%20Microsoft%20Teams%22%20from%20the%20Planning%20Workshop%20PowerPoint%20at%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.successwithteams.com%2F%23Download%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.successwithteams.com%2F%23Download%3C%2FA%3E.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-712640%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-712640%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F297872%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40TedTame%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BHi%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThis%20message%20is%20directed%20at%20this%20thread%20in%20general%20-%20apologies%20in%20advance%20if%20I'm%20posting%20in%20the%20wrong%20place%20but%20I'm%20at%20my%20wits'%20end.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20an%20individual%20S4B%20user%20trying%20to%20make%20video%20calls%20%2B%20screenshare%20with%20another%2C%20bigger%20organisation%20that%20I'm%20subcontracting%20for.%20I%20can't%20call%20them%2C%20but%20they%20can%20call%20me.%20I%20also%20keep%20getting%20pushed%20onto%20Microsoft%20Teams%2C%20which%20I%20*can*%20call%20them%20on%2C%20but%20*can't*%20use%20to%20screenshare%20with.%20When%20I%20open%20up%20S4B%20I%20get%20a%20very%20limited%20interface%20and%20it%20seems%20like%20a%20I%20can't%20do%20much%20at%20all.%20I%20also%20get%20a%20tiny%20message%20down%20the%20bottom%20right%20saying%20%22S4B%20and%20Exchange%20aren't%20making%20a%20connection%20right%20now%22.%20Other%20piece%20of%20information%20is%20that%20I%20am%20on%20GSuite%20using%203rd%20party%20mail%20app%20(not%20Outlook)%2C%20which%20might%20or%20might%20not%20come%20into%20play.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBefore%20last%20week%20I%20had%20no%20idea%20Skype%20for%20Business%20was%20a%20separate%20entity%20to%20Skype%20so%20this%20shows%20how%20new%20I%20am%20to%20this.%20I%20feel%20like%20I've%20gone%20down%20a%20rabbit%20hole%20trying%20to%20fix%20the%20issue.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20an%20Office%20365%20Business%20Essentials%20license%20-%20as%20far%20as%20I%20understand%20(it's%20super%20hard%20to%20tell%20from%20their%20pricing%20plan%20structure)%20this%20gives%20me%20access%20to%20S4B.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMicrosoft%3F%20Microhard%20more%20like.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20help%20from%20people%20who%20know%20more%20than%20I%20do%20would%20be%20appreciated!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJohn%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-751771%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-751771%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F364284%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40John_Baker%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHi%20John%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESupport%20engineer%20from%20SFB%20and%20Teams%20team.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20think%20you%20are%20facing%20more%20than%20one%20issue%20when%20you%20are%20using%20Skype%20for%20business.%20Here%20are%20some%20information%20that%20might%20be%20useful%20for%20you%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E1.%3CSPAN%3ESkype%20for%20Business%20users%20can%20chat%20one-on-one%20with%20Teams%20users.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E2.%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3ESkype%20for%20Business%20users%20can%20make%20one-on-one%20voice%20and%20video%20calls%20to%20Teams%20users%2C%20and%20vice%20versa.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3ESome%20features%20aren%E2%80%99t%20available%20for%20the%20interop%20chat%20and%20interop%20calling%20experience%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CUL%3E%0A%3CLI%3EMarkdown%2C%20rich%20text%2C%20and%20the%20full%20emoticon%20set%20aren%E2%80%99t%20supported%20either%20from%20Teams%20or%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20Other%20native%20features%20of%20the%20compose%20box%20in%20Teams%20chats%20aren%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EScreen%20sharing%20(desktop%20or%20app%20sharing)%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20isn%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EGroup%20chats%20(multiple-party%20conversations)%20in%20Teams%20can%20only%20include%20participants%20who%20are%20using%20Teams.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EMultiple-party%20IM%20conversations%20(group%20chats)%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business%20can%20only%20include%20participants%20who%20are%20using%20Skype%20for%20Business.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EEscalating%20an%20ongoing%20peer-to-peer%20voice%20or%20video%20call%20to%20a%20multiple-party%20call%20involving%20both%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20users%20isn%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EFile%20transfer%20for%20two-party%20chats%2C%20or%20file%20attachment%20in%20group%20chats%2C%20from%20Teams%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business%E2%80%94and%20vice%20versa%E2%80%94aren%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EThere%20is%20no%20interoperability%20with%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Persistent%20Chat.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3C%2FUL%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EFor%20all%20these%20limitations%20(except%20for%20Persistent%20Chat)%2C%20one%20possible%20workaround%20is%20for%20one%20user%20to%20start%20a%20meeting%20and%20invite%20the%20other%20user%20to%20join%20it.%20This%20workaround%20is%20the%20basis%20for%20interop%20escalation.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3ESee%20detailed%20info%20here.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fteams-and-skypeforbusiness-coexistence-and-interoperability%25C2%25A0%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fteams-and-skypeforbusiness-coexistence-and-interoperability%25C2%25A0%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-751773%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-751773%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F364284%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40John_Baker%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F297872%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40TedTame%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BHi%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThis%20message%20is%20directed%20at%20this%20thread%20in%20general%20-%20apologies%20in%20advance%20if%20I'm%20posting%20in%20the%20wrong%20place%20but%20I'm%20at%20my%20wits'%20end.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI'm%20an%20individual%20S4B%20user%20trying%20to%20make%20video%20calls%20%2B%20screenshare%20with%20another%2C%20bigger%20organisation%20that%20I'm%20subcontracting%20for.%20I%20can't%20call%20them%2C%20but%20they%20can%20call%20me.%20I%20also%20keep%20getting%20pushed%20onto%20Microsoft%20Teams%2C%20which%20I%20*can*%20call%20them%20on%2C%20but%20*can't*%20use%20to%20screenshare%20with.%20When%20I%20open%20up%20S4B%20I%20get%20a%20very%20limited%20interface%20and%20it%20seems%20like%20a%20I%20can't%20do%20much%20at%20all.%20I%20also%20get%20a%20tiny%20message%20down%20the%20bottom%20right%20saying%20%22S4B%20and%20Exchange%20aren't%20making%20a%20connection%20right%20now%22.%20Other%20piece%20of%20information%20is%20that%20I%20am%20on%20GSuite%20using%203rd%20party%20mail%20app%20(not%20Outlook)%2C%20which%20might%20or%20might%20not%20come%20into%20play.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBefore%20last%20week%20I%20had%20no%20idea%20Skype%20for%20Business%20was%20a%20separate%20entity%20to%20Skype%20so%20this%20shows%20how%20new%20I%20am%20to%20this.%20I%20feel%20like%20I've%20gone%20down%20a%20rabbit%20hole%20trying%20to%20fix%20the%20issue.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20have%20an%20Office%20365%20Business%20Essentials%20license%20-%20as%20far%20as%20I%20understand%20(it's%20super%20hard%20to%20tell%20from%20their%20pricing%20plan%20structure)%20this%20gives%20me%20access%20to%20S4B.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EMicrosoft%3F%20Microhard%20more%20like.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAny%20help%20from%20people%20who%20know%20more%20than%20I%20do%20would%20be%20appreciated!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJohn%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F364284%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40John_Baker%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHi%20John%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESupport%20engineer%20from%20SFB%20and%20Teams%20team.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20think%20you%20are%20facing%20more%20than%20one%20issue%20when%20you%20are%20using%20Skype%20for%20business.%20Here%20are%20some%20information%20that%20might%20be%20useful%20for%20you%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E1.%3CSPAN%3ESkype%20for%20Business%20users%20can%20chat%20one-on-one%20with%20Teams%20users.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E2.%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3ESkype%20for%20Business%20users%20can%20make%20one-on-one%20voice%20and%20video%20calls%20to%20Teams%20users%2C%20and%20vice%20versa.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3ESome%20features%20aren%E2%80%99t%20available%20for%20the%20interop%20chat%20and%20interop%20calling%20experience%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CUL%3E%0A%3CLI%3EMarkdown%2C%20rich%20text%2C%20and%20the%20full%20emoticon%20set%20aren%E2%80%99t%20supported%20either%20from%20Teams%20or%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20Other%20native%20features%20of%20the%20compose%20box%20in%20Teams%20chats%20aren%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EScreen%20sharing%20(desktop%20or%20app%20sharing)%20between%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20isn%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EGroup%20chats%20(multiple-party%20conversations)%20in%20Teams%20can%20only%20include%20participants%20who%20are%20using%20Teams.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EMultiple-party%20IM%20conversations%20(group%20chats)%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business%20can%20only%20include%20participants%20who%20are%20using%20Skype%20for%20Business.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EEscalating%20an%20ongoing%20peer-to-peer%20voice%20or%20video%20call%20to%20a%20multiple-party%20call%20involving%20both%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20users%20isn%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EFile%20transfer%20for%20two-party%20chats%2C%20or%20file%20attachment%20in%20group%20chats%2C%20from%20Teams%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business%E2%80%94and%20vice%20versa%E2%80%94aren%E2%80%99t%20supported.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EThere%20is%20no%20interoperability%20with%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Persistent%20Chat.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3C%2FUL%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3EFor%20all%20these%20limitations%20(except%20for%20Persistent%20Chat)%2C%20one%20possible%20workaround%20is%20for%20one%20user%20to%20start%20a%20meeting%20and%20invite%20the%20other%20user%20to%20join%20it.%20This%20workaround%20is%20the%20basis%20for%20interop%20escalation.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3ESee%20detailed%20info%20here.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22x-hidden-focus%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fteams-and-skypeforbusiness-coexistence-and-interoperability%25C2%25A0%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fteams-and-skypeforbusiness-coexistence-and-interoperability%25C2%25A0%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-751781%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-751781%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EFollow%20my%20last%20post%2C%20if%20you%20face%20anything%20that%20we%20say%20support%2C%20it%20means%20that%20something%20is%20not%20properly%20configured%20or%20network%20issue.%20We%20need%20to%20do%20further%20investigation.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-904150%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-904150%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F423187%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40PerfectReign%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E1.%20You%20can%20join%20a%20Teams%20meeting%20using%20the%20Teams%20app%20or%20Chrome%2FEdge%20Browsers.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E2.%20Teams%20supports%20interop%20to%20Skype%20for%20business%20Online%2C%20it%20has%20limitations%20as%20described%20(badly)%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fteams-and-skypeforbusiness-coexistence-and-interoperability%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehere%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20however%20if%20your%20SfB%20is%20'hosted'%20it%20will%20depend%20whether%20that%20is%20hybrid-connected%20to%20Skype%20for%20business%20Online.%20Simple%20answer%20for%20now%20would%20be%20that%20you'll%20have%20a%20different%20address%20for%20online.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E3.%20As%202.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E4.%20Probably%20until%20you%20can%20migrate%20to%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-904418%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-904418%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThat%20helps%20clear%20things%20up.%20So%2C%20the%20teams%20and%20S4B%20user%20databases%20are%20separate%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-903908%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-903908%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20tagging%20on%20this%20thread%20as%20I%20see%20many%20people%20have%20answered.%20Still%20not%20quite%20sure%20of%20the%20way%20forward.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20just%20finished%20rolling%20out%20Skype%20For%20Business%20to%20my%20organization%20in%20late%202018.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20have%20roughly%201500%20users%20on%20board.%20My%20company%20has%2077000%20O365%20licenses%20and%20we%20use%20S4B%20hosted.%26nbsp%3B%20I've%20been%20hearing%20from%20my%20account%20rep%20that%20Teams%20is%20the%20new%20product%20and%20my%20manager%20has%20installed%20it.%26nbsp%3B%20In%20testing%2C%20I%20see%20it%20has%20a%20chat%20functionality%20like%20Skype%20as%20well%20as%20collaboration.%26nbsp%3B%20What%20I%20cannot%20figure%20out%20are%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E1.%20If%20I%20create%20a%20%22teams%22%20meeting%20in%20Outlook%2C%20will%20staff%20who%20don't%20have%20Teams%20installed%20be%20able%20to%20join%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E2.%20Can%20I%20stop%20using%20S4B%20for%20IM%20and%20start%20using%20Teams%3F%20Will%20my%20users%20who%20don't%20have%20Teams%20yet%20be%20able%20to%20send%2Freceive%20my%20chats%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E3.%20Will%20I%20see%20their%20chats%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E4.%20We%20are%20very%20mobile.%20Will%20I%20need%20both%20S4B%20and%20Teams%20running%20on%20my%20phone%20to%20get%20messages%20and%20attend%20meetings%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1109103%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1109103%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F423187%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40PerfectReign%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F178440%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESkype%26nbsp%3Bfor%26nbsp%3BBusiness%20Online%20is%20retiring%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHow%20does%20this%20affect%20everything%20as%20there%20still%20in%20my%20eyes%20is%20no%20clear%20way%20to%20replace%20skype%20for%20business%20yet%20it%20is%20end%20of%20life!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1483533%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1483533%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F43051%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nico%20Martens%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%22It'S%20nOt%20A%20RePlACeMenT%22%20lol.%26nbsp%3B%20Thanks%20for%20the%20graphic.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1931830%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Using%20Teams%20to%20Replace%20Skype%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1931830%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F707759%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40lowend15%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BWell%2C%20we%20all%20watched%20that%20go%20off%20the%20rails%20over%20the%20years.%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20still%20stuck%20on%20the%20very%20original%20question%20on%20this%20thread%20that%20we%20ran%20around%2C%20over%20and%20past%2C%20but%20never%20actually%20got%20answered.%26nbsp%3B%20Now%20that%20it%20appears%20that%20TEAMS%20was%20indeed%20a%20replacement%20for%20SFB...%26nbsp%3B%20The%20original%20question%20was...%20How%20do%20I%20invite%20people%20from%20other%20places%3F%26nbsp%3B%20What%20is%20the%20%22That%20one%20person%20who%20is%20NOT%20an%20employee%20but%20needs%20to%20be%20in%20on%20this%20meeting%20and%20doesn't%20have%20Office%20365%22%20solution%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Sure%2C%20we%20can%20chat%20up%20another%20Teams%20User%20if%20the%20organizations%20have%20allowed%20it.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20we%20first%20wanted%20to%20talk%20to%20a%20Skype%20user.%26nbsp%3B%20A%20regular%20online%20chat%20with%20a%20regular%20online%20person...who%20is%20NOT%20part%20of%20our%20organization.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20STILL%20don't%20know.%26nbsp%3B%20After%20three%20years%20of%20asking%20how%20to%20do%20it%2C%20and%20the%20platform%20being%20retired%20and%20replaced...the%20question%20has%20yet%20to%20be%20answered.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Highlighted
Contributor

Hi There, 

 

I am having trouble figuring out how to use Teams as my only client and shut down Skype. I know that if I do not have Skype running I will get the notifications in Teams. But I only want 1 client. 

 

So my first big question is how do I send a message to a Skype user from Teams?

 

Thanks

51 Replies
Highlighted
Best Response confirmed by Karuana Gatimu (Microsoft)
Solution

Hi Mike. You'll still need Skype (for Business) for online meetings and calls with people outside your organization. You can hold a meeting within your org using Microsoft Teams, but attendees will need to be members of the team. Teams meetings have a limit of 80 attendees. You can share your screen in a Teams meeting. But if your org is in the practice of recording meetings, this feature isn't available in Teams yet. 

As for Skype for Business Interop

  • Interoperability between Microsoft Teams and Skype for Business is currently available for peer to peer (P2P) instant messaging only.
  • For a Microsoft Teams user to send an IM to a Skype for Business user, the Microsoft Teams user must be enabled with their account homed in Skype for Business Online.
  • Incoming Skype for Business messages can be responded to on the Microsoft Teams client

- "Plan, Deliver and Operate Microsoft Teams" from the Planning Workshop PowerPoint at https://www.successwithteams.com/#Download.

 

Highlighted
And by the way, Teams is not aimed to replace Skype for Business or any other collaboration tool in the Office 365 ecosystem...the scenario you have just described is a good example. Teams is not designed as an IM solution to work with both organizational and not organizational users
Highlighted
That's right. The IM / Calls / Meetings are for enriching the real-time collaboration within the Team. Skype extends beyond the Team.
Highlighted

Hmm, I'm not so sure anymore, after seeing this in my Office 365 tenant:Teams_integration_office365_mail.PNG

Highlighted

This is going to confuse lots of folks! Is this really just an advert for Microsoft Teams and a nudge for those users to check out Teams, or something else? Either way, it seems poorly worded and out of place.

Highlighted

We've also seen this? Does anyone know if it's reversable?

 

As I understand Teams isn't a replacement for Skype so this feels wrong.

 

/Thomas

Highlighted

Same for us (French users) 
A bit confusing as we have some users fully online and for whom we can't let them without Skype IM...

Answer awaited with a huge restlessness...

Highlighted

Nico, I found your article helpful with more background info - Office 365 Mail pushing Microsoft Teams.  Sounds like this is (was?) just a temporary glitch but we can read more into if want to ;)

Highlighted
I agree - I am all for MS Teams. We love it, but this was an unwelcome surprise on many levels. MS owes its customers an explanation QUICKLY.
Highlighted
We have the same issue (large manufacturing MNC).
Highlighted

Microsoft can't really do this until they have external guest access and federation working for Teams. My users of Skype Online (through OWA) cannot contact externals... It is impacting my Service Desk. 

 

UPDATE: Microsoft recognized this was a little mistake. It is fixed.

Highlighted

I agree with the frustration. This cannot be done this way, i haven't really understood that this was going to happen and i don't see any information about this change. 

It's creating a lot of confusion since we have disabled teams up until we can figure out how that space can interact (if) with our way of working which now consists of mainly yammer for social collaboration. Yes, I understand the advantages of teams but we are trying to avoid too much confusion too early.

 

Microsoft, this is extremely unfortunate and badly implemented/informed.

Highlighted

This story got picked up by Mary Jo Foley - Microsoft may be repositioning some (or all) of Skype for Business as Teams pointing to this very thread, that answers some of the questions many of us had.

 

"A number of Office 365 users received a big surprise today when trying to log onto Skype for Business."

Highlighted

Now confirmed -

 

"We're upgrading Skype for Business to Microsoft Teams. This will take us some time to complete. For now, this is an opt-in experience, as we continue to work on enhancing the Microsoft Teams experience."

We're upgrading Skype for Business to Microsoft Teams.png

Highlighted

I've got that message in the Admin center too but no other sign of it, and hope this is one of their crazy ideas that doesn't come to pass!?!

Highlighted
It's a pity the additional information link goes nowhere.
Highlighted

For testing purposes, we have multiple O365 tenants.  This message appeared in all of them today.  Within an hour, all of the messages were gone.  Oooops.  

Highlighted
Same for us.
Highlighted

Today, we have another surprise. You can add external guest users - but it doesn't work after you add them.

 

The external guest gets an email saying they've been added, but when they try to get in, it fails...