Mar 20 2020 07:00 AM
We're experiencing a weird situation where a scheduled Teams meeting shows up both in our Outlook calendars and in Calendars within Teams, as it should, but joining the meeting from either place opens up separate meetings, even though it is the same meeting, with the same name at the same time of day.
So we have people joining one meeting sitting around waiting, while everyone else is in the other meeting. Shouldn't everything be synced so that joining the meeting from either place sends everyone to the same meeting?
Mar 20 2020 07:18 AM
Mar 20 2020 09:06 AM
@Chris Webb I think it as a recurring meeting. I'm checking into it now. I wasn't the one who created the meeting, so I'm waiting to hear back.
Mar 20 2020 12:26 PM
@Chris Webb It was a recurring meeting! Is this a known bug?
Mar 20 2020 12:33 PM
SolutionMar 26 2020 08:47 AM
Similar thing happened to one of our meetings today. Some of our users were joining the meeting from a link in an email (using various Windows, Mac and iPad devices), others were joining from within the Teams calendar. A mix of users from both groups ended up in two different meetings with one group waiting in the Lobby indefinitely as the host was in the other meeting.
I double checked the links both groups of users were being directed to and they appeared to be the same. The calendar event was also a recurring appointment (the Teams meeting link was created in the series, not the individual event).
Jun 03 2020 09:14 AM
@Chris Webb we were advised by premier support to re-run the meeting migration service for the affected meeting host. This has resolved the issue in most cases for us.
Start-CsExMeetingMigration -Identity "username@domain.com"
I did also pose a question about the method by which we were converting users to see if there was anything we could do to reduce the number of occurrences of this issue, but premier support was unable to provide any guidance there. Initially as we were migrating, we ran a PowerShell script to set the co-existence policy for all the users in the migration, then set the policies for all of the users. I re-wrote my script to setup each user individually with the co-existence policy and the rest of our policies. This seemed to help, but I've only tested on a small population right now, and it was already a fairly small issue for us.
Mar 20 2020 12:33 PM
Solution