Home
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EUpdate!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EBased%20on%20customer%20feedback%2C%20we%20are%20updating%20how%20presence%20works%20when%20organizations%20are%20using%20both%20Microsoft%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20%26nbsp%3BWith%20this%20update%2C%20routing%20and%20presence%20are%20fully%20aligned.%20To%20ensure%20that%20routing%20follows%20presence%2C%20presence%20publishing%20is%20now%20based%20on%20a%20user%E2%80%99s%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20If%20a%20user%20is%20in%20TeamsOnly%20mode%2C%20then%20any%20other%20user%2C%20whether%20in%20Teams%20or%20Skype%20for%20Business%2C%20will%20see%20presence%20based%20on%20the%20user%E2%80%99s%20activity%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20If%20a%20user%20is%20in%20any%20of%20these%20modes%3A%20SfbOnly%2C%20SfbWithTeamsCollab%2C%20SfbWithTeamsCollabAndMeetings%20%E2%80%93%20then%20any%20other%20user%2C%20whether%20in%20Teams%20or%20Skype%20for%20Business%2C%20will%20see%20presence%20based%20on%20the%20user%E2%80%99s%20activity%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20If%20a%20user%20is%20in%20Islands%20or%20Legacy%20mode%2C%20presence%20is%20independent%20and%20the%20values%20need%20not%20match.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CUL%3E%0A%3CLI%3EFrom%20Teams%2C%20any%20other%20user%20within%20the%20same%20tenant%20will%20see%20presence%20based%20on%20that%20Island%20user%E2%80%99s%20activity%20in%20Teams.%20Chat%20and%20calls%20from%20Teams%20users%20in%20same%20tenant%20to%20that%20Islands%20user%20will%20land%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EFrom%20Teams%2C%20any%20other%20user%20in%20a%20federated%20tenant%20will%20see%20presence%20based%20on%20the%20user%E2%80%99s%20activity%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20Chats%20and%20calls%20from%20Teams%20users%20in%20a%20federated%20tenant%20to%20that%20Islands%20user%20will%20land%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3CLI%3EFrom%20Skype%20for%20Business%2C%20any%20other%20user%20will%20see%20presence%20based%20on%20the%20user%E2%80%99s%20activity%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3C%2FUL%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Please%20note%20that%20If%20a%20recipient%20you%20previously%20had%20a%20conversation%20thread%20with%20is%20subsequently%20upgraded%20to%20Teams%2C%20that%20thread%20will%20no%20longer%20reflect%20accurate%20presence%20and%20will%20no%20longer%20be%20routable.%20You%20should%20start%20a%20new%20thread.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYou%20can%20find%20more%20information%20about%20co-existence%20modes%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fmigration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype%23coexistence-modes%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehere%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F58725iF71B9CFBCFB95C06%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Coexistence%20modes.png%22%20title%3D%22Coexistence%20modes.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-TEASER%20id%3D%22lingo-teaser-280190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20updating%20how%20presence%20works%20when%20organizations%20are%20using%20both%20Microsoft%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20%26nbsp%3BWith%20this%20update%2C%20routing%20and%20presence%20are%20fully%20aligned.%20To%20ensure%20that%20routing%20follows%20presence%2C%20presence%20publishing%20is%20now%20based%20on%20a%20user%E2%80%99s%20coexistence%20mode.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F58724i15738C135D1DAB1B%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Coexistence%20modes.png%22%20title%3D%22Coexistence%20modes.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-TEASER%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-280190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPresence%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-390880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-390880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F249547%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nippertje74%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BMy%20presence%20indicators%20are%20working%20this%20morning.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20guess%20it%20just%20had%20to%20cycle%20through%20to%20pick%20up%20my%20changes.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-390566%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-390566%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYes%2C%20all%20working%20fine%20now.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-390452%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-390452%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHave%20the%20presence%20issues%20been%20resolved%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I%20have%20our%20tenant%20set%20up%20to%20islands.%26nbsp%3B%20Most%20users%20are%20using%20SfB%2C%20but%20we%20are%20slowly%20rolling%20out%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20set%20myself%20as%20Teams%20only%20in%20the%20Teams%20admin%20center%20and%20the%20chat%20functionality%20works%20great.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20can%20see%20and%20respond%20to%20SfB%20chats%20and%20Teams%20chats.%26nbsp%3B%20My%20presence%20shows%20to%20other%20users%2C%20but%20when%20I%20try%20to%20see%20other's%20presence%20in%20any%20apps%20(Outlook%2C%20SharePoint%2C%20etc)%20other%20than%20Teams%2C%20I%20don't%20see%20anything%20for%20presence.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20chat%20link%20is%20also%20disabled.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-329423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-329423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9476%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Linus%20Cansby%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20Hi%20Linus%2C%20thank%20you%20so%20much%20for%20your%20response.%20In%20fact%20many%20of%20the%20users%20having%20this%20issue%20never%20had%20the%20Teams%20workload%20enable%20at%20all%20so%20i%20have%20opened%20a%20case%20with%20MS.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-328592%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-328592%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F202984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Andres%20Lopez%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BThat%20SfBOnly%20mode%20is%20kind%20of%20confusing%20since%20if%20you%20have%20a%20user%20in%20that%20mode%20but%20of%20some%20reason%20they%20have%20a%20Teams%20license%20(maybe%20included%20in%20E3%20or%20other%20package)%20they%20will%20get%20the%20message%20to%20their%20Teams%20account%20when%20a%20Teams%20users%20send%20a%20message%20to%20them.%20Even%20if%20you%20remove%20the%20Teams%20license%20from%20that%20user%20they%20will%20be%20Teams%20marked%20and%20messages%20with%20be%20sent%20to%20Teams%2C%20but%20then%20they%20can%20sign%20in%20and%20read%20that%20message%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20the%20SfbOnly%20user%20starts%20the%20chat%20from%20SfB%20will%20work%20ok%20between%20Teams%20and%20SfB.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20the%20solution%20for%20you%20is%20to%20set%20SfBOnly%20to%20your%20users%20and%20not%20give%20them%20the%20Teams%20license.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-328203%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-328203%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EWe%20are%20having%20issues%20with%20Interop%20when%20a%20TeamsOnly%20users%20sends%20an%20IM%20to%20a%20SfBonly%20user%2C%20the%20message%20never%20arrives%20in%20Skype%20client%20but%20instead%20and%20invitation%20email%20to%20Teams%20so%20If%20we%20have%20users%20in%20Teams%20Only%20mode%20and%20they%20send%20an%20IM%20to%20a%20user%20who%20is%20S4B%2C%20they%26nbsp%3B%20receive%20an%20email%20that%20someone%20tried%20to%20message%20them%20in%20teams%20and%20click%20here%20to%20join%20teams.%20This%20is%20not%20the%20functionality%20we%20want%20to%20see%20happen%20and%20is%20killing%20out%20piloting%20of%20Teams.%20Users%20who%20are%20Skype%20only%20and%20haven't%20launch%20teams%20need%20to%20receive%20messages%20in%20Skype%20only%2C%20not%20teams.%20Teams%20only%20users%20need%20to%20know%20that%20message%20sent%20to%20users%20on%20skype%20will%20only%20go%20to%20users%20on%20skype%20and%20not%20try%20to%20have%20them%20launch%20Teams.%20This%20causes%20confusion%20and%20has%20caused%20pilot%20users%20to%20no%20longer%20want%20to%20use%20Teams%20in%20fear%20that%20the%20users%20they%20are%20trying%20to%20IM%20will%20not%20receive%20the%20IM%20in%20skype%20properly.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297102%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297102%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYeah%20that%20error%20you%20posted%20was%20an%20infrastructure%20issue%20that%20happened%20with%20I%20want%20to%20say%20Europe%20region%2C%20just%20so%20happen%20to%20coincide%20with%20your%20change%20%3AP.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297087%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297087%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESo%2C%20our%20issue%20with%20Teams%20disconnecting%20and%20restarting%20simply%20went%20away%20the%20next%20day%20when%20we%20all%20logged%20in%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297040%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297040%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3A%20Update..%26nbsp%3B%20Mr.%20Patience%20here...%26nbsp%3B%20The%20change%20was%20successfully%20applied%20and%20displays%20now%20%22Teams%20Only%22%20for%20the%20user.%26nbsp%3B%20End-user%20behavior%20when%20they%20try%20to%20run%20SfB%20is%20as%20expected.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%20Thanks%20man!%26nbsp%3B%20You%20are%20a%20rock%20star.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAre%20you%20aware%20of%20any%20threads%20related%20to%20%22Identity%20Status%22%2Fpresence%20within%20MS%20Teams%20for%20Guest%20Users%3F%26nbsp%3B%20(issue%3A%20always%20%22Status%20Unknown%22)%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Eit%20should%20show%20blank%2C%20I'll%20have%20to%20check%20mine%20and%20see%20what%20it's%20showing%2C%20but%20that%20warning%20is%20new%20but%20it%20should%20change.%20I%20think%20it%20might%20take%20a%20bit.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297035%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297035%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64907%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%3C%2FA%3E%3A%26nbsp%3B%20Perhaps%20things%20have%20changed%20in%20the%20PS%20environment%20as%20well.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%20After%20executing%20the%20Grant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy%20for%20a%20specific%20user%2C%20I%20get%20a%20warning%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%22WARNING%3A%20Users%20with%20this%20policy%20will%20become%20full%20Teams-only%20users.%20They%20will%20no%20longer%20be%20able%20to%20use%20Skype%20for%20Business%20clients%2C%20except%20to%20join%20Skype%20for%20Business%20meetings.%20For%20details%2C%20see%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FUpgradeToTeams%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FUpgradeToTeams%3C%2FA%3E%22%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20I%20then%20view%20the%20user%20account%20in%20the%20Teams%20Admin%20center%2C%20they%20still%20show%20%22Use%20Org-wide%20Settings%22..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EScrew%20loose%20in%20the%20main%20driver%3F%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297025%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297025%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYeah%2C%20we%20are%20all%20waiting%20for%20the%20Admin%20center%20to%20have%20the%20options.%20Still%20only%20way%20is%20PS.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-297024%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-297024%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20to%20all%20who%20have%20posted%20here.%20It%20has%20been%20helpful.%26nbsp%3B%20As%20of%20today%2C%20is%20it%20correct%20to%20expect%20that%20all%20tenants%20should%20allow%20for%20setting%20the%20%22Teams%20Upgrade%22%2Fco-existence%20setting%20to%20%22Teams%20Only%22%20via%20the%20Admin%20Center%2FOrg-wide%20setttings%2FTeams%20Upgrade%20UI%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20audited%20a%20number%20of%20our%20client's%20tenants%20(along%20with%20our%20own)%20and%20none%20appear%20to%20allow%20the%20co-existence%20mode%20of%20%22Teams%20Only%22%20either%20at%20the%20Org-wide%20level%2C%20or%20at%20the%20user%20level.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20do%20understand%20that%20this%20can%20be%20done%20via%20PS%20(thanks%20for%20the%20blog%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E!)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERegards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EConfused%20in%20Montana%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-295507%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-295507%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOK%2C%20so%20I%20think%20that%20our%20sessions%20are%20timing%20out%20since%20we%20upgraded%20each%20user%20to%20TeamsOnly%20mode%20because%20of%20a%20service%20issue%20here%20in%20the%20UK.%20A%20polling%20server%20is%20not%20responding%20and%20this%20times%20out%20and%20disconnects%20our%20sessions%2C%20which%20quickly%20re-establish%20when%20the%20app%20is%20restarted.%20Perhaps%20we%20jumped%20the%20gun%20and%20enabled%20TeamsOnly%20on%20our%20tenant%20before%20it%20was%20truly%20ready.%20I%20have%20logged%20a%20ticket%20with%20MS%20to%20find%20out%20more.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CFONT%3E2018-12-05T15%3A52%3A07.774Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BNotificationBannerStore%3A%20Showing%20user%20the%20disconnected%20banner.%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A54.018Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAUTHSSO%3A%20Return%20cached%20token%20for%20resource%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A54.017Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAUTHSSO%3A%20Start%20acquiring%20Adal%20tokens%20--%20resources%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%3C%2FA%3E.%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A54.016Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BUnifiedPresenceService%3A%20successfully%20published%20endpoint%20presence%2C%20activity%20-%20Available%2C%20availability%20-%20Available%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A53.730Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAUTHSSO%3A%20Return%20cached%20token%20for%20resource%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A53.729Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAUTHSSO%3A%20Start%20acquiring%20Adal%20tokens%20--%20resources%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpresence.teams.microsoft.com%2F%3C%2FA%3E.%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A53.727Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BUnifiedPresenceService%3A%20attempting%20to%20set%20availability%20-%20Available%2C%20activity%20-%20Available%2C%20isUserInitiated%20-%20false%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A53.723Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BPresenceService%3A%20Trying%20to%20set%20status%2C%20isUnifiedPresenceService%3Dtrue%2C%20isForced%3Dfalse%2C%20isRetriable%3Dtrue%2C%20status%3DOnline%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A53.723Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BPresenceService%3A%20restoreMyStatus%20with%20appState%20Disconnected%2C%20machineState%20MachineActive%2C%20isForced%3Dfalse%2C%20currentStatus%3DOnline%2C%20newStatus%3DOnline%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.724Z%20War%26nbsp%3BSyncLongPollService%3A%20No%20events%20from%20long%20poll%20in%2090%20seconds%2C%20notifying%20chat%20sync%20is%20down%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.722Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BPresencePostActiveService%3A%20checkTransition%3A%20appState%3A%20Disconnected%2C%20machineState%3A%20MachineActive(1)%2C%20isPostingActive%3A%20true%2C%20shouldPostActive%3A%20true%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.720Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BUnifiedPresenceService%3A%20app%20state%20changed%20to%207%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.720Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAppState%3A%20App%20health%20changed%20to%20false%20after%20273.644%20seconds%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.719Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAppState%3A%20App%20state%20changed%20from%20Interactive%20to%20Disconnected%20due%20to%20longpoll.sync%20is%20down%20with%20code%20undefined%20after%20110.292%20seconds%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A52.719Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAppState%3A%20Service%20ChatSync%20up%20state%20changed%20from%20true%20to%20false%20due%20to%20longpoll.sync%20is%20down%20with%20code%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A40.236Z%20War%26nbsp%3BHTTP%20request%20DM%20longPollSubscription%20GET%20failed%3A%20GET%20%22%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%3C%2FA%3E%22%2C%20status%3A%20429%2C%20response%3A%20%7B%22Code%22%3A%22LimitExceeded%22%2C%22Subcode%22%3A%22Too%20Many%20Requests%22%2C%22Message%22%3A%22ThrottlingMessageHandler.%20The%20current%20concurrent%20request%20limit%20%E2%80%A6%2C%20errorCode%3A%20undefined%2C%20requestId%3A%20undefined%2C%20correlationId%3A%20undefined%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A36.144Z%20War%26nbsp%3BHTTP%20request%20DM%20longPollSubscription%20GET%20failed%3A%20GET%20%22%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%3C%2FA%3E%22%2C%20status%3A%20429%2C%20response%3A%20%7B%22Code%22%3A%22LimitExceeded%22%2C%22Subcode%22%3A%22Too%20Many%20Requests%22%2C%22Message%22%3A%22ThrottlingMessageHandler.%20The%20current%20concurrent%20request%20limit%20%E2%80%A6%2C%20errorCode%3A%20undefined%2C%20requestId%3A%20undefined%2C%20correlationId%3A%20undefined%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CSTRONG%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A34.903Z%20War%26nbsp%3BHTTP%20request%20DM%20longPollSubscription%20GET%20failed%3A%20GET%20%22%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fuksouth-prod.notifications.teams.microsoft.com%2Fusers%2F8%3Aorgid%3Ae6729775-09ea-4e7f-a1d5-9d13ae36f5a4%2Fendpoints%2Fa6da279d-ea4d-4203-b5ff-0e72dfeea2c9%2Fevents%2Fpoll%3C%2FA%3E%22%2C%20status%3A%20429%2C%20response%3A%20%7B%22Code%22%3A%22LimitExceeded%22%2C%22Subcode%22%3A%22Too%20Many%20Requests%22%2C%22Message%22%3A%22ThrottlingMessageHandler.%20The%20current%20concurrent%20request%20limit%20%E2%80%A6%2C%20errorCode%3A%20undefined%2C%20requestId%3A%20undefined%2C%20correlationId%3A%20undefined%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A27.099Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BDesktopEventsService%3A%20Purging%20memory%20-%20on%20inactive%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A27.098Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3Bmessage-list%3A%20shouldScrollWithUpdates()%3A%20isScrolledToBottom%20%3D%20true%2C%20AppActive%20%3D%20false%2C%20isComposingEditOrReply%20%3D%20false%2C%20appStateService%20%3D%20Interactive%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A24.525Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAppState%3A%20network%20status%20verified%20as%20online%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A24.508Z%20Err%26nbsp%3B%7B%22statusCode%22%3A-1%2C%22headers%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22errorMessage%22%3Anull%2C%22errorCode%22%3Anull%7D%3CBR%20%2F%3E2018-12-05T15%3A51%3A24.507Z%20Inf%26nbsp%3BAppState%3A%20verify%20network%20status%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-295373%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-295373%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EOK%2C%20so%20our%20two-way%20presence%20was%20resolved%20by%20granting%20each%20user%20the%20upgrade%20policy%20one%20by%20one%2C%20but%20now%20their%20desktop%20Teams%20client%20disconnects%20after%20a%20few%20minutes%20and%20restarts.%20Mobile%20and%20web%20apps%20are%20fine.%20We%20did%20have%20an%20on-prem%20Skype%20for%20Business%20deployment%20that%20we%20decommissioned%20and%20moved%20to%20Online%20before%20making%20the%20upgrade%2C%20so%20I%20would%20imagine%20this%20has%20something%20to%20do%20with%20my%20problems.%20Debug%20logs%20giving%20me%20nothing%20to%20go%20on.%20%3A(%3C%2Fimg%3E%20I%20will%20report%20back%20if%20I%20find%20a%20solution.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-295357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-295357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F249547%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nippertje74%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ethanks%20for%20the%20information%20..%20I%20am%20working%20on%20this%20currently.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThuyavan%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-294995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-294995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EOdd%2C%20I've%20upgraded%202%20tenants%20now%20just%20doing%20the%20tenant%20and%20didn't%20have%20an%20issue%20with%20external%20federation.%20Guess%20a%20good%20trick%20up%20the%20sleeve%20if%20it%20doesn't%20work%20the%20org%20setting%20way!%20Thanks%20for%20the%20info!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-294992%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-294992%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20All%20-%20I%20had%20a%20weird%20problem.%20I%20moved%20all%20users%20to%20TeamsOnly%20mode%20a%20few%20weeks%20back%20even%20though%20our%20tenant%20didn't%20have%20the%20option%20and%20using%20the%20powershell%20command%20to%20grant%20the%20upgrade%20policy%20org-wide.%20This%20worked%20fine%20and%20our%20SkypeforBusiness%20deactivated%20and%20diverted%20us%20to%20Teams.%20However%2C%20we%20noticed%20that%20we%20only%20had%20one-way%20presence%20with%20external%20contacts%20where%20we%20could%20see%20theirs%2C%20but%20nobody%20could%20ours.%20After%20a%20lot%20of%20reading%20tweaking%20settings%2C%20I%20noticed%20that%20two-way%20presence%20worked%20if%20I%20granted%20the%20upgrade%20policy%20to%20each%20user%20invidually%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EGrant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy%20-PolicyName%20UpgradeToTeams%20-Identity%20username%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20hope%20this%20helps%20someone%20and%20saves%20them%20a%20few%20hours.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-288575%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-288575%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELoving%20this!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20words%20about%20hybrid%20interop%3F%20Given%20that%20alot%20of%20organizations%20still%20user%20on-prem%20deployments%20of%20SfB%20or%20hybrid%20with%20SfBO.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-287651%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-287651%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI've%20recently(exactly%20on%20Oct-26)%20created%20a%20c%23%20application%20using%20UCWA%20Web%20Sdk%20which%20updates%20the%20user's%20presence%20from%20Microsoft%20teams.%20I%20created%20a%20azure%20AAD%20Native%20application%20configured%20with%20SFB%20Online%20API%20with%20required%20admin%20consents%20and%20used%20its%20App%20ID%20in%20the%20c%23%20application.%20I%20got%20the%20user's%20presence%20correctly.%20But%20from%20November%2C%20I%20am%20not%20able%20to%20get%20my%20user's%20presence%20as%20it%20shows%20Offline%20all%20the%20time.%20Do%20i%20need%20to%20make%20any%20mode%20changes%20or%20modify%20any%20changes%20in%20my%20AAD%20Application%3F%20Thanks%20in%20advance.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286888%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286888%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIf%20you%20are%20in%20two%20complete%20different%20tenants%2C%20then%20you%20have%20to%20have%20external%20access%20enabled%20for%20both%20tenants.%20And%20in%20order%20to%20write%20from%20Teams%20to%20Teams%2C%20the%20end%20point%20has%20to%20be%20in%20Teams%20Only%20mode.%20otherwise%20by%20default%20they%20will%20get%20messages%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business%20in%20any%20other%20modes.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286885%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286885%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Eto%20reproduce%20it%20i%20was%20loged%20in%20with%20teams.microsoft.com%20in%20Firefox%20with%20the%20first%20tenant%20and%20in%20the%20teams-app%20with%20the%20other%20user%20from%20the%202nd%20tenant.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eso%20i%20guess%20i%20should%20see%20the%20other%20user%20-%20didn%C2%B4t%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eand%20i%20should%20be%20able%20to%20write%20to%20each%20other%20-%20didn%C2%B4t%2C%20cause%20it%20showed%20as%20offline%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286882%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286882%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20you%20switch%20to%20islands%20that's%20expected%20if%20your%20users%20aren't%20logged%20in%20and%20using%20Teams%2C%20they%20won't%20get%20the%20message%20as%20they%20did%20previously%20in%20Skype%20since%20islands%20means%20Teams%20and%20Skype%2C%20so%20from%20Teams%2C%20to%20them%20will%20go%20to%20Teams.%20You%20would%20have%20to%20send%20messages%20from%20Skype%20to%20them%20for%20them%20to%20get%20it%20in%20Skype.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20just%20moved%20from%20%22legacy%22%20to%20%22islands%22%20in%20one%20tenant%2C%20and%20in%20another%20tenant%20i%20was%20moved%20from%20%22legacy%22%20to%20%22islands%22%20(at%20least%20i%20didn%C2%B4t%20do%20the%20upgrade).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ewhen%20i%20now%20try%20to%20write%20in%20teams%20between%20these%202%20tenants%20i%20can%C2%B4t%20see%20the%20state%20of%20the%20users%20in%20the%20other%20tenant.%20and%20then%20it%20says%20it%20sent%20a%20mail%20because%20the%20user%20is%20offline.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eanyone%20else%20experienced%20that%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-286396%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-286396%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWill%20this%20affect%20also%20for%20hybrid%20organizations%3F%20Or%20is%20it%20expected%20that%20your%20users%20are%20all%20in%20Skype%20online%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20worked.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20was%20able%20to%20set%20myself%20to%20Teams%20only%20and%20now%20SfB%20won't%20let%20me%20sign%20in%20to%20the%20desktop%20client%2C%20which%20is%20all%20good.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20also%20changed%20my%20entire%20org%20last%20night%20to%20be%20SfB%20only.%26nbsp%3B%20Most%20users%20are%20still%20set%20to%20follow%20the%20org%20settings.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20did%20change%20a%20few%20people%20to%20individually%20not%20be%20Org%20Settings%20but%20to%20be%20SfB%20only.%26nbsp%3B%20One%20of%20these%20people%20was%20Erin.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EStill%20when%20Erin%20messages%20me%20from%20her%20SfB%2C%20she%20gets%20the%20warning%20that%20I'm%20using%20Teams%20and%20that%20she%20should%20upgrade%20because%20what%20is%20she%20thinking%20not%20being%20on%20Teams%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I%20hate%20that%20message.%26nbsp%3B%20Need%20to%20get%20rid%20of%20it%20so%20we%20can%20roll%20this%20out%20without%20everyone%20calling%20the%20help%20desk%20saying%20they%20need%20to%20be%20on%20Teams%20because%20why%20aren't%20they%20indeed%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOverall%2C%20Presence%20is%20not%20working%20for%20me%20in%20Outlook%20365.%26nbsp%3B%20(We%20are%20hybrid%20but%20all%20user%20mailboxes%20are%20in%20Exchange%20Online).%26nbsp%3B%20I%20show%20the%20SfB%20user%20I%20exchanged%20IM's%20with%20(me%20in%20Teams)%20and%20I%20see%20one%20SfB%20user%20(Erin!)%20with%20a%20red%20dot%20and%20one%20SfB%20user%20with%20a%20yellow%20dot%20(another%20user%20I%20individually%20set%20to%20be%20SfB%20Only).%20%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBut%20everyone%20else%20has%20a%20white%20dot%20(in%20my%20Outlook).%26nbsp%3B%20The%20other%20members%20in%20my%20Team%20who%20may%20still%20use%20either%2Fboth%20Teams%20or%20SfB%20are%20showing%20offline%20(white%20dot)%20as%20well.%20%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3E(me%20and%20my%20dept%20have%20been%20testing%20Teams%20for%20a%20while)%20%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETo%20Sum%20Up%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EToday%20I%20will%20be%20changing%20individuals%20to%20not%20follow%20Org%20Settings%20of%20SfB%20Only%20but%20rather%20to%20have%20their%20individual%20settings%20be%20SfB%20only%20in%20an%20attempt%20to%20fix%20presence%20to%20work%20for%20me%20(being%20a%20Teams%20Only%20individual).%20%26nbsp%3B%20I%20expect%20this%20to%20fix%20me%20seeing%20everyone%20as%20offline%20in%20Teams%20and%20Office%20365%20programs%20such%20as%20Outlook.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPeople%20who%20are%20on%20Teams%20and%20SfB%20-%20their%20presence%20is%20not%20showing%20up%20for%20me%20in%20my%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20These%20are%20people%20who%20are%20on%20my%20IT%20Team%20and%20have%20been%20testing%20Teams%20with%20me%20for%20months.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPeople%20on%20SfB%20can%20now%20see%20my%20presence%20so%20that%20is%20good.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGetting%20rid%20of%20the%20%22Eugene%20is%20using%20Teams%20-%20why%20aren't%20you%20Loser%3F%22%20message%20SfB%20only%20individuals%20see%20when%20they%20IM%20me%20(as%20a%20Teams%20Only%20user)%20is%20still%20an%20issue%20without%20a%20solution%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Or%20is%20there%20something%20I%20am%20missing%20here%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEugene%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285945%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285945%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F241641%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Jeff%20Hutto%3C%2FA%3ESee%20the%20link%20below%20for%20the%20cmdlets%20for%20changing%20user%20status%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fmigration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype%23teamsupgradepolicy-managing-migration-and-co-existence%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoftteams%2Fmigration-interop-guidance-for-teams-with-skype%23teamsupgradepolicy-managing-migration-and-co-existence%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMake%20sure%20you%20connect%20to%20Skype%20Online%20connector%20first%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EImport-Module%20SkypeOnlineConnector%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%24credential%20%3D%20Get-Credential%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%24S4Bsession%20%3D%20New-CsOnlineSession%20-Credential%20%24credential%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EImport-PSSession%20%24S4Bsession%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy%20-PolicyName%20UpgradeToTeams%20-Identity%26nbsp%3B%3CUSERPRINCIPALNAME%3E%3C%2FUSERPRINCIPALNAME%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285942%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285942%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EDuplicate%20post%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285932%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285932%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ECan%20you%20provide%20a%20link%20to%20the%20associated%20PowerShell%20cmdlets%20for%20making%20these%20changes%20such%20as%20TeamsOnly%20mode%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285779%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285779%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F241471%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ewoud%20Vreugdenhil%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BOh%20yes%2C%20communication%20is%26nbsp%3Bthe%20foundation%20of%20success.%20I%20believe%20that%20development%20will%20move%20in%20the%20right%20direction%20soon.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285768%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20agree%20with%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F241143%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Marek%20Rabas%3C%2FA%3E.%20Within%20my%20line%20of%20business%20(import%2Fexport%20fruit%20and%20vegetables)%20the%20Skype%20for%20consumers%20is%20widely%20used%2C%20all%20over%20the%20world%20actually.%20So%20communication%20from%20Teams%20with%20Skype%20for%20consumers%20is%20almost%20a%20must%20for%20us.%20As%20long%20Skype%20for%20consumers%20is%26nbsp%3Bnot%20being%20sent%20to%20application%20heaven%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20and%20Teams%20is%20added%20to%20W10%2C%20my%20collegues%20and%20customers%20and%20clients%20will%20keep%20using%20Skype%20for%20consumers.%20That%20makes%20adopting%20Teams%20a%20lot%20harder%20for%20companies%20like%20ours.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285743%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285743%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F2729%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Jon%20Ostroushko%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BYes%2C%20I%20referred%20the%20consumer%20version%20of%20Skype.%20It's%20a%20logical%20step%20to%20add%20anybody%20to%20the%20video%20conference%20e.g.%20who%20has%20Windows%2010%20installed%20included%20Skype%20app.%20The%20other%20way%20is%20to%20widely%20extend%20free%20Teams%20app%20into%20every%20Windows%2010%20installation%20and%20send%20Skype%20into%20the%20application%20heaven%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20It%20will%20bring%20a%20lot%20of%20new%20functions%20to%20Windows%20users%2C%20so%20there%20is%20no%20wait%20I%20think%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285695%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285695%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3EGoal%20is%20basically%20just%20to%20have%20them%20work%20in%20some%26nbsp%3Bconsistent%20way%20that%20we%20can%20confidently%20(and%20concisely)%20explain%20to%20users%20and%20support%20teams.%20Right%20now%20it's%20kind%20of%20chaotic%2C%20but%20probably%20because%20we%20have%20a%20handful%20of%20us%20in%20TeamsOnly%2C%20a%20few%20dozen%20in%20Islands%2C%20and%20the%20rest%20in%20SfBOnly.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20SfBOnly%20people%20started%20as%20Islands%2C%20and%20test%20conversations%20with%20them%20before%20switching%20them%20to%20SfBOnly%20seem%20to%20be%20stuck%20in%20Teams%20forever.%26nbsp%3B%20At%20some%20point%2C%20we'll%20probably%20throw%20the%20switch%20and%20move%20everyone%20to%20TeamsOnly.%20Thankfully%20we%20don't%20have%20any%20calling%20or%20phone%20system%20integration%20to%20worry%20about%2C%20and%20online%20meetings%20in%20SfB%20were%20barely%20used.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285692%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285692%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%E2%80%99s%20been%20awhile%20since%20I%20messed%20with%20this.%20I%20guess%20it%20was%20just%20hiding%20it.%20I%20do%20know%20if%20your%20trying%20to%20prevent%20people%20cross%20chatting%20to%20Skype%20you%20turn%20that%20option%20in%20policy%20off%20so%20they%20chat%20with%20Skype%20users%20in%20teams%20goes%20away%20so%20you%20don%E2%80%99t%20even%20have%20the%20option%20to%20chat%20with%20Skype%20users.%20I%20saw%20that%20mess%20long%20before%20coexistence%20and%20disabled%20it.%20It%E2%80%99s%20moved%20now%20I%E2%80%99d%20have%20to%20go%20track%20it%20down.%20But%20what%20is%20end%20goal%20for%20your%20chats%20now%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285689%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285689%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E-%20Thanks.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20to%20confirm%2C%20if%20I've%20communicated%20with%20someone%20in%20Teams%2C%20my%20conversation%20with%20them%20is%20forever%20in%20Teams%3F%20Take%20a%20user%20who%20was%20Islands%20before%20we%20realized%20Islands%20is%20awful%20and%20we%20needed%20to%20set%20everyone%20to%20SfBOnly%E2%80%A6%20if%20I%20communicated%20with%20them%20from%20Teams%20while%20they%20were%20still%20Islands%2C%20I%20(as%20a%20Teams%20user)%20am%20never%20going%20to%20be%20able%20to%20chat%20with%20them%20and%20have%20it%20land%20in%20SfB%20on%20their%20side%2C%20right%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAlso%2C%20do%20I%20understand%20from%20your%20response%20that%20I%20*should*%20be%20able%20to%20remove%20a%20conversation%20that's%20with%20a%20SfB%20user%20(aka%20has%20the%20Skype%20icon)%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Because%20I%20definitely%20don't%20see%20a%20remove%2Fdelete%2Fetc.%26nbsp%3Boption%20in%20the%20menu.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20only%20difference%20between%20SfB%20and%20Teams%20conversations%20is%20the%20menu%20on%20a%20Teams%20conversation%20has%20%22Manage%20Apps%22%20in%20addition%20to%20Pin%2C%20Add%20to%20Favorites%2C%20Mute%2C%20and%20Hide%20which%20appear%20for%26nbsp%3Bboth.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESorry%20to%20go%20a%20little%20off%20the%20topic%20of%20presence%2C%20but%20the%20article%20makes%20it%20seem%20like%20this%20is%20pretty%20straightforward.%26nbsp%3B%20Our%20experience%20with%20the%20Teams%2FSfB%20interop%20has%20been%20anything%20but%20straightforward.%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285677%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285677%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIf%20it%20was%20already%20to%20their%20teams%20then%20it%20won%E2%80%99t%20change.%20%26nbsp%3BIt%E2%80%99s%20only%20if%20you%20used%20their%20%E2%80%9CSkype%E2%80%9D%20chat%20that%20had%20the%20icon%20next%20to%20it%20etc.%20if%20it%E2%80%99s%20not%20changing%20then%20it%20should%20work%20without%20issue.%20If%20you%20click%20the%20menu%20next%20to%20the%20chat%20and%20you%20can%E2%80%99t%20remove%20it%20then%20it%E2%80%99s%20a%20Teams%20chat%20already.%20%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285675%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285675%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20note%20that%20If%20a%20recipient%20you%20previously%20had%20a%20conversation%20thread%20with%20is%20subsequently%20upgraded%20to%20Teams%2C%20that%20thread%20will%20no%20longer%20reflect%20accurate%20presence%20and%20will%20no%20longer%20be%20routable.%20You%20should%20start%20a%20new%20thread.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3EHow%20exactly%20do%20we%20%22start%20a%20new%20thread%22%20with%20a%20person%20who%20has%20changed%20upgrade%20modes%3F%20The%20previous%20conversation%20is%20still%20in%20the%20Chat%20tab%2C%20and%20trying%20to%20start%20a%20new%20thread%20by%20using%20the%20New%20Chat%20button%20(pencil%20icon%20in%20the%20purple%20banner)%20seems%20to%20just%20bring%20up%20the%20previous%20conversation%20again.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285570%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285570%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20Thank%20you!%26nbsp%3B%20I%20will%20give%20it%20a%20shot!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285513%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285513%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F97260%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Eugene%20Beran%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BIt%20should%20be%20rolled%20out%20to%20everyone%20so%20that%20you%20can%20still%20set%20it%20via%20Powershell.%20I%20did%20a%20blog%20long%20while%20back%20with%20the%20commands%20and%20how%20to%20install%20%2F%20use%20the%20Skype%20Online%20power-shell%20module.%20to%20set%20it.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwebbtech365.blogspot.com%2F2018%2F08%2Fcannot-set-users-or-tenant-to-teams.html%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fwebbtech365.blogspot.com%2F2018%2F08%2Fcannot-set-users-or-tenant-to-teams.html%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285489%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285489%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMy%20only%20choices%20for%20Teams%20Upgrade%20(org-wide%20setting)%20in%20my%20Teams%20Admin%20Center%20are%20Islands%20or%20SfB%20only.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMy%20only%20choices%20for%20individual%20users%20under%20their%20Teams%20Upgrade%20is%3A%26nbsp%3B%20Use%20Org-Wide%20Settings%20or%20Islands%20or%20SfB%20Only.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20do%20not%20yet%20see%20the%20new%20Teams%20option.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20when%20you%20say%20it's%20rolled%20out%20to%20all%20tenants...am%20I%20looking%20in%20the%20wrong%20locations%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285478%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285478%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F2513%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Alexander%20Auras%3C%2FA%3E%20Is%20your%20Skype%20for%20Business%20hosted%20online%20or%20in%20your%20company%20(on%20premises)%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285382%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285382%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F241143%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Marek%20Rabas%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20believe%20you%20are%20referring%20to%20being%20able%20to%20contact%20Skype%20(consumer%20version)%20contacts.%20If%20that%20is%20the%20case%20I%20wouldn't%20expect%20to%20see%20that%20feature.%20That%20was%20formerly%20a%20roadmap%20item%20but%20from%20what%20I%20have%20been%20told%2C%20because%20Teams%20is%20now%20free%2C%20they%20will%20not%20be%20adding%20the%20ability%20to%20communicate%20with%20people%20that%20have%20Skype%20accounts%20and%20are%20using%20the%20Skype%20client.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285318%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285318%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F178440%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3E%2C%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F237241%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Matt%20Wilson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20experience%20the%20same%20in%20my%20tenant.%20In%20teams%20everybody%20appears%20as%20offline.%20In%20Skype%20for%20Business%20the%20status%20works%20as%20usual.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285316%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285316%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENice%20update.%20And%20when%20will%20I%20be%26nbsp%3Bable%20to%20contact%20people%20with%20Skype%20account%20with%20Teams%20app%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-284564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-284564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20wouldn%E2%80%99t%20think%20so%20but%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F3328%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40David%20Rosenthal%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bmight%20know!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-284562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-284562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20this%20rolling%20out%20the%20Government%20Tenants%20as%20well%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282978%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282978%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F237241%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Matt%20Wilson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bto%20my%20knowledge%20it's%20fully%20rolled%20out.%20I%20suspect%20that%20you%20are%20looking%20at%20old%20threads%20that%20may%20will%20become%20disconnected%20during%20the%20change.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1096%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dean%20Gross%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BThat%20feature%20seems%20to%20have%20rolled%20our%20recently%2C%20look%20in%20your%20Teams%20settings%20for%26nbsp%3B%3CSTRONG%3ERegister%20Teams%20as%20the%20chat%20app%20for%20Office%20(requires%20restarting%20Office%20applications)%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSTRONG%3Eon%20the%20general%20tab.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282973%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282973%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F178440%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Steven%20Collier%3C%2FA%3EThanks%20for%20the%20suggestion%2C%20I%20will%20try%20moving%20a%20couple%20users%20to%20SfB%20mode%20and%20test.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282971%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282971%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F192542%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Kevin%20Oliver%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BIf%20you%20set%20other%20users%20to%20be%20in%20SfB%20only%20mode%20then%20exactly%20what%20you%20want%20will%20happen.%20While%20they%20are%20in%20islands%20or%20legacy%20then%20you%20can%20get%20these%20non%20delivery%20scenarios%2C%20you%20won't%20get%20that%20when%20you%20have%20defined%20the%20mode%20for%20each%20user.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282959%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282959%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3Ewill%20this%20deployment%20have%20any%20impact%20on%20how%20the%20Presence%20icon%20works%20in%20Outlook%3F%20specifically%2C%20provide%20the%20ability%20to%20easily%20start%20a%20Teams%20chat%20instead%20of%20Skype%20chat.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282816%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282816%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F192542%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Kevin%20Oliver%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20Our%20solution%20was%20to%20move%20the%20Org-Wide%20setting%20to%20SfBOnly%2C%20then%20Teams%20users%20to%20TeamsUpgrade%20(Teams%20Only).%26nbsp%3B%20This%20has%20most-definitely%20helped...%20except%20for%20the%20issue%20I'm%20having%20above.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20I%20don't%20think%20it's%20supposed%20to%20work%20that%20way%20based%20on%20how%20I'm%20interpreting%20this%20blog%20post%2C%20so%20I'm%20awaiting%20confirmation%20of%20this%20before%20deciding%20what%20to%20do%20next.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-282506%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-282506%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28394%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Rahul%20Kayala%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20I%20thought%20I%20would%20like%20this%20update%3B%20however%2C%20now%20my%20SfB-only%20users%20are%20complaining%20they%20are%20showing%20up%20as%20completely%20Unavailable%20in%20Teams%20vs%20what%20I%20expected%20was%20for%20their%20Skype%20presence%20to%20appear%20in%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20you%20end%20up%20with%20the%20Skype-version%20of%20someone%20in%20Teams%2C%20it%20does%20show%20their%20Skype%20presence...%20but%20not%20on%20the%20Teams%20version%20of%20them.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUPDATE%3A%26nbsp%3B%20Now%20that%20I'm%20moving%20people%20to%20Teams-Only%20mode%2C%20the%20Skype%20users%20are%20complaining%20that%20the%20Teams%20people%20are%20now%20showing%20as%20Offline%20in%20Skype.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20just%20really%20doesn't%20sound%20like%20what%20this%20blog%20post%20was%20supposed%20to%20fix.%26nbsp%3B%20Please%20help%20clarify.%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20my%20only%20option%20to%20go%20back%20to%20Islands%20mode%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUPDATE%3A%26nbsp%3B%20Or...%20is%20it%20just%20that%20the%20changes%20mentioned%20in%20this%20blog%20post%20just%20haven't%20hit%20my%20tenant%20yet%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20hoping%20that's%20the%20answer.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20so%2C%20please%20clarify%20when%20we%20should%20anticipate%20this%20change%20being%26nbsp%3B%3CEM%3Efully%3C%2FEM%3E%20rolled%20out.%26nbsp%3B%20THANK%20YOU!!%26nbsp%3B%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281956%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281956%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20would%20be%20great%20if%20there%20was%20a%20way%20to%20control%20users%20being%20sent%20an%20message%20in%20teams%20when%20they%20have%20not%20been%20migrated%20yet.%20If%20we%20have%20users%20in%20Teams%20Only%20mode%20and%20they%20send%20an%20IM%20to%20a%20user%20who%20is%20offline%20in%20S4B%2C%20they%26nbsp%3B%20receive%20an%20email%20that%20someone%20tried%20to%20message%20them%20in%20teams%20and%20click%20here%20to%20join%20teams.%20This%20is%20not%20the%20functionality%20we%20want%20to%20see%20happen%20and%20is%20killing%20out%20piloting%20of%20Teams.%20Users%20who%20are%20Skype%20only%20and%20haven't%20launch%20teams%20need%20to%20receive%20messages%20in%20Skype%20only%2C%20not%20teams.%20Teams%20only%20users%20need%20to%20know%20that%20message%20sent%20to%20users%20on%20skype%20will%20only%20go%20to%20users%20on%20skype%20and%20not%20try%20to%20have%20them%20launch%20Teams.%20This%20causes%20confusion%20and%20has%20caused%20pilot%20users%20to%20no%20longer%20want%20to%20use%20Teams%20in%20fear%20that%20the%20users%20they%20are%20trying%20to%20IM%20will%20not%20receive%20the%20IM%20in%20skype%20properly.%20Teams%20is%20a%20great%20replace%20for%20skype%2C%20but%20to%20get%20the%20business%20to%20buy%20in%20and%20pilot%20the%20product%20we%20need%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20they%20know%20that%20messages%20sent%20to%20users%20will%20be%20received%20in%20the%20correct%20tool.%20Islands%20mode%20is%20not%20a%20valid%20option%20for%20this%20as%20users%20do%20not%20want%20to%20run%202%20tools.%20It%20is%20to%20confusing%20and%20complicated%2C%20considered%20a%20hassle%20limiting%20adoption%20for%20pilots%20users.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280502%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280502%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20is%20fantastic%20news.%20Thank%20you!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280257%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280257%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EGreat%20news.%20Is%20there%20any%20estimate%20on%20the%20release%20date%20of%20this%20user%20voice%20request%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16925461-allow-different-notifications-options-on-teams-and%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16925461-allow-different-notifications-options-on-teams-and%3C%2FA%3E%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20also%20share%20my%20opinion%20on%20how%20to%20enhance%20the%20notification%20behavior%20that%20I%20believe%20is%20vital%20in%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThis%20is%20what%20I%20think%20should%20be%20the%20behavior%20or%20it%20should%20be%20allowed%20the%20user%20to%20configure%20(one%20to%20one%20or%20group%20chats%20or%20channel%20conversations).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20One%20to%20one%20chat%20or%20group%20chat%3A%20When%20someone%20starts%20a%20conversation%2C%20a%20callout%20message%20should%20be%20displayed%20(to%20allow%20the%20person%20to%20know%20someone%20wants%20to%20chat)%3CSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThen%2C%20if%20we%20reply%20and%20someone%20in%20the%20conversion%20replies%20back%2C%20we%20should%20be%20able%20to%20not%20see%20a%20callout%20message%20for%20every%20message%20they%20send.%20A%20simple%20notification%20count%20with%20the%20number%20of%20unread%20messages%20in%20the%20Teams%20icon%20in%20the%20taskbar%20and%20the%20Teams%20icon%20blinking%20for%20a%20few%20seconds%20after%20the%20message%20is%20sent%20should%20be%20enough.%20This%20is%20what%20is%20the%20behavior%20in%20both%20Skype%20Consumer%20and%20Skype%20for%20Business%20and%20is%20the%20one%20that%20makes%20more%20sense%20to%20me%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20One%20to%20one%20chat%20or%20group%20chat%3A%20In%20resume%2C%20when%20someone%20starts%20a%20new%20conversation%2C%20the%20other%20involved%20persons%20should%20receive%20a%20callout%20message%20but%20not%20for%20the%20remainder%20of%20the%20conversation%2C%20where%20only%20taskbar%20blinking%20and%20showing%20notification%20counts%20should%20be%20displayed%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20Channel%20conversations%3A%20if%20a%20channel%20conversion%20is%20started%2C%20there%20shoudn't%20be%20any%20callout%20messages%20unless%20a%20person%20is%20mentioned%20directly%2C%20only%20the%20Teams%20icon%20blinking%20for%20a%20few%20seconds%20and%20the%20indication%20of%20the%20number%20of%20unread%20messages%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20main%20goal%20here%20is%20to%20be%20less%20interrupted%20by%20Teams%20notifications%20and%20in%20particular%20by%20callout%20notifications%20that%20are%20distracting%20and%20can%20make%20people%20to%20lose%20focus.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDoes%20this%20makes%20sense%20and%20is%20the%20team%20actively%20working%20on%20any%20of%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMiguel%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280234%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280234%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%40Deleted%20-%20Yes%2C%20this%20change%20has%20been%20rolled%20out%20to%20all%20tenants%20earlier%20today.%20Please%20note%20that%20it%20may%20take%20up%20to%20a%20day%20for%20the%20update%20to%20take%20affect%20for%20some%20users!%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%20-%20Glad%20you're%20liking%20it!%20Thanks%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280217%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280217%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20thought%20I%20notice%20my%20status%20get%20stuck%20on%20Away%20the%20other%20day.%20Assuming%20it%20was%20part%20of%20this%20push.%20Changing%20status%20in%20Teams%20seems%20to%20be%20much%20more%20responsive%20now.%20That's%20nice!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280211%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280211%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20this%20rolling%20out%20now%20and%20to%20all%20tenants%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-574298%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-574298%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20having%20a%20issue%20with%20Presence%20between%20TEAMS%20only%20company%20en%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Hybrid.%20We%20notice%20that%20presence%20status%20within%20Teams%20is%20being%20updated%20with%20a%20delay%20to%20Skype%20For%20business%20)hybrid)%20or%20even%20a%20wrong%20status%20is%20being%20send%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business.%20We%20noticed%20that%2C%20and%20not%20al%20the%20time%2C%20a%20TEAMS%20user%20is%20switching%20status%20from%20Available%20to%20away%20and%20back%20to%20Available%2C%20and%20that%20Busy%20is%20being%20send%20to%20Skype%20for%20Business%20Hybrid.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Enote%3A%20this%20presence%20updates%20are%20being%20send%20between%20federated%20partners.%20Somebody%20else%20having%20these%20issues%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERegards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJohan%20van%20der%20Stelt%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EVodafone%20Netherlands.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622392%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622392%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9476%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Linus%20Cansby%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BCould%20you%20elaborate%20on%20this%20one%3F%20Have%20tried%20and%20tested%20quite%20some%20scenario's%20around%20Teams%20Only%20communicating%20with%20SfBOnly%20(or%20SfBwithTeamsCollab)%20and%20each%20time%20so%20far%20the%20SfBOnly%20user%20is%20receiving%20an%20email%20from%20Teams%20saying%20that%20the%20Teams%20Only%20user%20is%20reaching%20out.%20So%20the%20messages%20are%20not%20received%20on%20Skype%20for%20Business%20unfortunately.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFor%20the%20scenario%20in%20which%20I%20disabled%20the%20Teams%20license%20the%20test%20user%20still%20gets%20the%20Teams%20email%2C%20and%20when%20opening%20Teams%20the%20user%20gets%20the%20error%20that%20no%20license%20is%20assigned.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20our%20organization%20we%20really%20have%20to%20do%20a%20phased%20migration%20from%20Skype%20for%20Business%20to%20Teams%2C%20so%20we%20need%20to%20get%20the%20scenario's%20working%20that%20initiating%20a%20chat%20or%20call%20from%20Teams%20Only%20ends%20up%20in%20Skype%20for%20Business%20for%20SfB%20users.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622543%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622543%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F62242%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Arie%20Versluis%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BWhen%20going%20from%20Islands%20or%20TeamsOnly%20to%20SfBOnly%20mode%20I've%20seen%20that%20problem.%20Even%20if%20you%20remove%20the%20Teams%20license%20messages%20and%20calls%20are%20not%20routed%20to%20Skype.%20The%20only%20solutions%20I've%20seen%20is%20to%20wait%20(up%20to%20a%20week)%20or%20contact%20Microsoft%20Support.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat%20is%20why%20it%20is%20important%20to%20have%20a%20plan%20before%20activating%20Teams%20for%20all%20users%20and%20be%20aware%20of%20these%20problems.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-645545%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-645545%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F62242%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Arie%20Versluis%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9476%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Linus%20Cansby%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bis%20correct%20here%2C%20you%20can't%20change%20the%20setting%20then%20go%20test%20it.%20It%20can%20take%20number%20of%20days%20before%20the%20routing%20will%20properly%20update%2C%20it's%20something%20Microsoft%20is%20working%20on%20improving%20but%20until%20then%20it%20makes%20it%20hard%20to%20do%20any%20kind%20of%20Migration.%20The%20best%20you%20can%20really%20do%20is%20set%20your%20org%20Skype%20only%20or%20skype%20with%20collab%2C%20wait%20till%20everyone%20is%20good%20in%20that%20mode%2C%20then%20migrate%20your%20stages%20in%20batches%20across%20keeping%20in%20mind%20that%20those%20users%20will%20have%20some%20lead%20time%20on%20the%20change%20over%20and%20it's%20something%20you%20can't%20plan%20or%20know%20turns%20on%20and%20is%20just%20something%20that%20will%20kick%20in%20when%20it%20does%20unfortunately.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20you%20were%20setup%20Islands%20then%20try%20switching%20and%20testing%2C%20you%20won't%20get%20any%20good%20results.%20Have%20to%20pick%20one%20path%20other%20than%20islands%2C%20wait%20for%20it%20to%20converge%2C%20then%20start%20moving%20folks.%20Or%20use%20and%20stay%20in%20Islands%20and%20make%20sure%20everyone%20knows%20what%20they%20are%20and%20install%20%2F%20use%20Teams%20and%20Skype%20during%20the%20transition%2C%20then%20move%20people%20to%20Teams%20only%20from%20there%20knowing%20all%20Chat%20from%20Teams%20will%20end%20up%20in%20Teams%20etc.%20in%20this%20mode.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-692931%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Update!%20Presence%20now%20respects%20a%20user's%20coexistence%20mode%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-692931%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9476%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Linus%20Cansby%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BThanks%20for%20the%20responses.%20Putting%20other%20users%20on%20SfBOnly%20or%20SfBWithTeamsCollab%20and%20waiting%20a%20few%20days%20indeed%20resulted%20in%20successful%20testing%20to%20reach%20those%20users%20from%20a%20TeamsOnly%20user.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Microsoft

Based on customer feedback, we are updating how presence works when organizations are using both Microsoft Teams and Skype for Business.  With this update, routing and presence are fully aligned. To ensure that routing follows presence, presence publishing is now based on a user’s coexistence mode


If a user is in TeamsOnly mode, then any other user, whether in Teams or Skype for Business, will see presence based on the user’s activity in Teams.


If a user is in any of these modes: SfbOnly, SfbWithTeamsCollab, SfbWithTeamsCollabAndMeetings – then any other user, whether in Teams or Skype for Business, will see presence based on the user’s activity in Skype for Business.


If a user is in Islands or Legacy mode, presence is independent and the values need not match.

 

  • From Teams, any other user within the same tenant will see presence based on that Island user’s activity in Teams. Chat and calls from Teams users in same tenant to that Islands user will land in Teams.
  • From Teams, any other user in a federated tenant will see presence based on the user’s activity in Skype for Business. Chats and calls from Teams users in a federated tenant to that Islands user will land in Skype for Business. 
  • From Skype for Business, any other user will see presence based on the user’s activity in Skype for Business.


Please note that If a recipient you previously had a conversation thread with is subsequently upgraded to Teams, that thread will no longer reflect accurate presence and will no longer be routable. You should start a new thread.

You can find more information about co-existence modes here

 

Coexistence modes.png 

64 Comments
New Contributor

@Chris Webb : Update..  Mr. Patience here...  The change was successfully applied and displays now "Teams Only" for the user.  End-user behavior when they try to run SfB is as expected.   Thanks man!  You are a rock star.

 

Are you aware of any threads related to "Identity Status"/presence within MS Teams for Guest Users?  (issue: always "Status Unknown")

Regular Visitor

So, our issue with Teams disconnecting and restarting simply went away the next day when we all logged in

Yeah that error you posted was an infrastructure issue that happened with I want to say Europe region, just so happen to coincide with your change :P. 

Established Member

We are having issues with Interop when a TeamsOnly users sends an IM to a SfBonly user, the message never arrives in Skype client but instead and invitation email to Teams so If we have users in Teams Only mode and they send an IM to a user who is S4B, they  receive an email that someone tried to message them in teams and click here to join teams. This is not the functionality we want to see happen and is killing out piloting of Teams. Users who are Skype only and haven't launch teams need to receive messages in Skype only, not teams. Teams only users need to know that message sent to users on skype will only go to users on skype and not try to have them launch Teams. This causes confusion and has caused pilot users to no longer want to use Teams in fear that the users they are trying to IM will not receive the IM in skype properly. 

Trusted Contributor

@Andres Lopez That SfBOnly mode is kind of confusing since if you have a user in that mode but of some reason they have a Teams license (maybe included in E3 or other package) they will get the message to their Teams account when a Teams users send a message to them. Even if you remove the Teams license from that user they will be Teams marked and messages with be sent to Teams, but then they can sign in and read that message in Teams.

If the SfbOnly user starts the chat from SfB will work ok between Teams and SfB.

 

So the solution for you is to set SfBOnly to your users and not give them the Teams license.

Established Member

@Linus Cansby  Hi Linus, thank you so much for your response. In fact many of the users having this issue never had the Teams workload enable at all so i have opened a case with MS.

Contributor

Have the presence issues been resolved?  I have our tenant set up to islands.  Most users are using SfB, but we are slowly rolling out Teams.  I set myself as Teams only in the Teams admin center and the chat functionality works great.  I can see and respond to SfB chats and Teams chats.  My presence shows to other users, but when I try to see other's presence in any apps (Outlook, SharePoint, etc) other than Teams, I don't see anything for presence.  The chat link is also disabled. 

Regular Visitor

Yes, all working fine now. 

Contributor

Thanks @Nippertje74 My presence indicators are working this morning.  I guess it just had to cycle through to pick up my changes.

Senior Member

We are having a issue with Presence between TEAMS only company en Skype for Business Hybrid. We notice that presence status within Teams is being updated with a delay to Skype For business )hybrid) or even a wrong status is being send to Skype for Business. We noticed that, and not al the time, a TEAMS user is switching status from Available to away and back to Available, and that Busy is being send to Skype for Business Hybrid.

 

note: this presence updates are being send between federated partners. Somebody else having these issues?

 

Regards,

Johan van der Stelt

Vodafone Netherlands.

 

 

New Contributor

@Linus Cansby Could you elaborate on this one? Have tried and tested quite some scenario's around Teams Only communicating with SfBOnly (or SfBwithTeamsCollab) and each time so far the SfBOnly user is receiving an email from Teams saying that the Teams Only user is reaching out. So the messages are not received on Skype for Business unfortunately. 

 

For the scenario in which I disabled the Teams license the test user still gets the Teams email, and when opening Teams the user gets the error that no license is assigned.

 

In our organization we really have to do a phased migration from Skype for Business to Teams, so we need to get the scenario's working that initiating a chat or call from Teams Only ends up in Skype for Business for SfB users.

Trusted Contributor

 @Arie Versluis When going from Islands or TeamsOnly to SfBOnly mode I've seen that problem. Even if you remove the Teams license messages and calls are not routed to Skype. The only solutions I've seen is to wait (up to a week) or contact Microsoft Support.

 

That is why it is important to have a plan before activating Teams for all users and be aware of these problems.

@Arie Versluis@Linus Cansby is correct here, you can't change the setting then go test it. It can take number of days before the routing will properly update, it's something Microsoft is working on improving but until then it makes it hard to do any kind of Migration. The best you can really do is set your org Skype only or skype with collab, wait till everyone is good in that mode, then migrate your stages in batches across keeping in mind that those users will have some lead time on the change over and it's something you can't plan or know turns on and is just something that will kick in when it does unfortunately. 

 

If you were setup Islands then try switching and testing, you won't get any good results. Have to pick one path other than islands, wait for it to converge, then start moving folks. Or use and stay in Islands and make sure everyone knows what they are and install / use Teams and Skype during the transition, then move people to Teams only from there knowing all Chat from Teams will end up in Teams etc. in this mode. 

New Contributor

@Linus Cansby @Chris Webb Thanks for the responses. Putting other users on SfBOnly or SfBWithTeamsCollab and waiting a few days indeed resulted in successful testing to reach those users from a TeamsOnly user.