Exclusion of "Encryption downgrade activity"

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-524287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EExclusion%20of%20%22Encryption%20downgrade%20activity%22%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-524287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhy%20can't%20you%20exclude%20specific%20servers%20for%20following%20%E2%80%9CEncryption%20downgrade%20activity.%E2%80%9D%20alerts.%20It%20seems%20logic%20to%20me%20that%20this%20feature%20is%20also%20available%20for%20this%20type%20alert.%20Assume%20following%20scenario%3A%20A%20customer%20has%20couple%20of%20servers%20running%20old%20software%20which%20are%20using%20low%20encryption%20schemes.%20In%20other%20words%20you%20would%20like%20to%20exclude%20these%20servers%20for%20this%20type%20of%20alert.%20Apparently%20for%20this%20alert%20the%20exclusion%20functionality%20is%20not%20foreseen.%20What%20is%20the%20underlying%20idea%20behind%20this%3F%20Could%20this%20be%20included%20as%20a%20future%20feature%20request%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETHX%3CBR%20%2F%3Ekeith%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-532161%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Exclusion%20of%20%22Encryption%20downgrade%20activity%22%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-532161%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F307919%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40keith_be%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%2C%20This%20functionality%20is%20available%20in%20Azure%20ATP.%20For%20ATA%20we%20will%20add%20it%20as%20a%20FR%2C%20we%20currently%20can't%20commit%20to%26nbsp%3Bbackward-port%20it%20into%20ATA.%20Thanks%2C%20Tali%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-533845%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Exclusion%20of%20%22Encryption%20downgrade%20activity%22%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-533845%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F104809%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tali%20Ash%3C%2FA%3Ethanks%20for%20your%20answer%20and%20considering%20this%20functionality%20as%20a%20feature%20request.%20Could%20we%20somewhere%20vote%20for%20it%20%3A).%20Hopefully%20you%20port%20it%20soon%20to%20ATA.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EKind%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EKeith%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Highlighted
Occasional Contributor

Hi,
 
Why can't you exclude specific servers for following “Encryption downgrade activity.” alerts. It seems logic to me that this feature is also available for this type alert. Assume following scenario: A customer has couple of servers running old software which are using low encryption schemes. In other words you would like to exclude these servers for this type of alert. Apparently for this alert the exclusion functionality is not foreseen. What is the underlying idea behind this? Could this be included as a future feature request?

THX
keith

2 Replies
Highlighted
Hi @keith_be , This functionality is available in Azure ATP. For ATA we will add it as a FR, we currently can't commit to backward-port it into ATA. Thanks, Tali
Highlighted

@Tali Ashthanks for your answer and considering this functionality as a feature request. Could we somewhere vote for it :). Hopefully you port it soon to ATA. 

 

Kind regards,

Keith