May 21 2021 05:04 AM
May 21 2021 05:04 AM
Hello, please bear with me this is my first post. Apologies if in wrong place!
I work for a small charity using E3 non-profit. We have user accounts and a combo of groups/shared mailboxes for some work teams. (Groups lack some features, hence the 'combo' approach!)
Our IT support company recommended using User accounts for everything as it is 'easier'
I had 1 response on a forum agreeing with this, saying that user accounts are more secure due to 2FA.
I completely agree with 2FA for user accounts, but I thought groups/shared mailboxes didn't have passwords, using a membership policy instead? Are they any less secure?
My question: Should we use User accounts for work teams?
It just seems odd so I would welcome some other opinions. Feel free to cite 'official' sources or your own practical experiences. NB I'm not after practical advice as I know how to use accounts, 2FA etc.
Thanks very much!
Andy
May 21 2021 12:01 PM
SolutionMay 23 2021 08:22 AM
@Vasil Michev Hi Vasil, thanks for your response.
This is what I thought! I can't understand why our IT support and the MS-certified respondent are advising me to switch to user accounts?
Thanks again,
Andy
May 23 2021 05:30 PM
May 28 2021 02:49 AM
@MichaelVi24 thanks for this.
I've found that shared mailboxes still create a User account, which I've been told is a baked-in feature.
As long as I block sign-ins for this linked user account, that should be OK, right?
May 28 2021 03:16 AM
May 31 2021 02:53 PM
May 31 2021 02:56 PM
May 21 2021 12:01 PM
Solution