SOLVED

Ability to connect existing SharePoint team sites to Office 365 Groups is coming later this year

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70431%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAbility%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70431%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EImportant%20sets%20of%20announcements%20today%20from%20the%20SharePoint%20team%2C%20including%20this%20specific%20one%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3C!--%20WDS%20Meta%20Tags%20--%3E%3C!--%20END%20WDS%20Meta%20Tags%20--%3E%3C!--%20This%20site%20is%20optimized%20with%20the%20Yoast%20SEO%20plugin%20v4.3%20-%20https%3A%2F%2Fyoast.com%2Fwordpress%2Fplugins%2Fseo%2F%20--%3E%3C!--%20%2F%20Yoast%20SEO%20plugin.%20--%3E%3C!--%20Stream%20WordPress%20user%20activity%20plugin%20v3.1.1%20--%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CDIV%20class%3D%22hfeed%20site%20%22%20id%3D%22page%22%3E%0A%3CDIV%20class%3D%22site-content%22%20id%3D%22content%22%3E%0A%3CDIV%20class%3D%22content-area%22%20id%3D%22primary%22%3E%0A%3CARTICLE%20class%3D%22post-227437%20post%20type-post%20status-publish%20format-standard%20has-post-thumbnail%20hentry%20product-office-365%20product-onedrive%20product-sharepoint%20product-yammer%20audience-business%20audience-dev%20audience-it%20audience-non-profit%20audience-on-premises%20audience-partner%20audience-public-sector%20audience-school%20audience-small-business%20type-news%20featured_topics-administration%20featured_topics-compliance%20featured_topics-mobility%20featured_topics-security%20featured_topics-social%20lifecycle-adopt%20lifecycle-deploy%20lifecycle-learn%20lifecycle-manage%20sku-small-business-p%20sku-education%20sku-enterprise%20sku-government%20sku-kiosk%20sku-midsize%20device-android%20device-ipad%20device-iphone%20device-mac-os-x%20device-surface%20device-windows%20device-windows-phone%22%20id%3D%22post-227437%22%3E%0A%3CDIV%20class%3D%22entry-content%22%3E%0A%3CUL%3E%0A%3CLI%3E%3CSTRONG%3EThe%20ability%20to%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%3CSTRONG%3Econnect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%2C%20so%20you%20can%20augment%20existing%20sites%20with%20shared%20conversations%2C%20calendar%20and%20Planner.%3C%2FLI%3E%0A%3C%2FUL%3E%0A%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3C%2FARTICLE%3E%0A%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3C%2FDIV%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.office.com%2F2017%2F05%2F16%2Fnew-sharepoint-and-onedrive-capabilities-accelerate-your-digital-transformation%2F%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fblogs.office.com%2F2017%2F05%2F16%2Fnew-sharepoint-and-onedrive-capabilities-accelerate-your-digital-transformation%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-70431%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EOffice%20365%20Groups%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3ESharePoint%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-314339%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-314339%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWhat's%20the%20status%20for%20the%20solution%20and%20resources%20for%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20guessing%2C%20and%20also%20this%20is%20a%20very%20technical%20answer%20that%20might%20take%20some%20re-reading%20to%20comprehend%2C%20but%20I%20think%20the%20answer%20is%20...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%22The%20square%20root%20of%20diddly%20squat.%22%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-314336%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-314336%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHappy%20new%20year%20all.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAnyone%20can%20point%20me%20to%20a%20doc%20that%20summarizes%20the%20current%20state%20of%20%22groupification%22%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhat%20methods%20and%20source%20templates%20are%20supported%2C%20not%20supported%2C%20recommended%2C%20known%20limitations%2C%20etc%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJC%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-254837%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-254837%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIts%20not%20dead.%20Its%20just%20%22time%20consuming%22%20for%20Microsoft%20to%20do%20it%20properly.%20Point%20and%20case%20of%20how%20broken%20Microsoft's%20SharePoint%20multi-tenant%20service%20is.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-235766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-235766%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20don't%20believe%20you%20can%20do%20the%20main%20site%20as%20a%20365%20Group.%20Only%20the%20top-level%20sites%2C%20i.e.%20the%20ones%20in%20%2Fteams%20or%20%2Fsites%20can%20be%20converted.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3E%3CEM%3EGroup-connection%20can%20be%20performed%20for%20top-level%20site%20collections%20only.%20You%20cannot%20connect%20subsites%20to%20Office%20365%20groups.%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Fdev%2Ffeatures%2Fgroupify%2Fgroupify-overview%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Fdev%2Ffeatures%2Fgroupify%2Fgroupify-overview%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234439%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234439%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Edo%20you%20know%20if%20there's%20a%20workaround%20or%20solution%20to%20get%20my%20main%20domain%20connected%20to%20an%20o365%20group%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234437%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234437%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20option%20is%20not%20available%20for%20all%20the%20templates%20available%20for%20classic%20SPO%20sites%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-234399%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-234399%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Eis%20this%20live%20yet%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20new%20to%20o365%2C%20but%20my%20main%20domain%20does%20not%20have%20that%20%22Connect%20to%20O365%20Group%22%20as%20an%20option%20yet.%20however%2C%20some%20of%20my%20newer%20team%20sites%20do%20have%20that%20option.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20I%20was%20just%20wondering%20how%20to%20get%20my%20primary%20main%20domain%20(ex%3A%20mycompany.sharepoint.com)%20to%20have%20that%20option%20to%20connect%20to%20an%20O365%20group%2C%20for%20the%20sake%20of%20having%20Teams%20show%20those%20sharepoint%20files%20in%20the%20Files%20tab.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-189639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-189639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EMmm%2C%20delayed%20three%20times%2C%20to%20be%20delivered%20in%20two%20chunks%2C%20and%20with%20a%20PnP%20(unsupported%2C%20open-source%2C%20if%20it%20works%20it%20works%2C%20but%20if%20it%20doesn't%20you're%20on%20your%20own%20in%20the%20forums)%20preparation%20scanner.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhy%20do%20I%20get%20these%20two%20familiar%20%22Microsoft%20v.01%20product%22%20feelings%3F%20...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(1)%20Microsoft%20really%20don't%20want%20to%20own%20it.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(2)%20An%20overwhelming%20urge%20to%20invite%20you%20and%20everyone%20else%20to%20go%20first%20in%20running%20it%20on%20your%20production%20%22classic%22%20sites%20and%20let%20me%20know%20how%20it%20goes%20-%20and%20then%20I%20might%20touch%20it%20with%20a%20barge%20pole.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-189613%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-189613%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESee%20this%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSharePoint-Blog%2FRolling-out-tenant-admin-tools-to-connect-existing-SharePoint%2Fba-p%2F188750%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSharePoint-Blog%2FRolling-out-tenant-admin-tools-to-connect-existing-SharePoint%2Fba-p%2F188750%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-187361%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-187361%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESo%20it's%20now%20Q2%2C%20rather%20than%20April.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhich%20means%20end%20of%20June%2C%20followed%20by%20an%20announcement%20that%20it's%20slipped%20again.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-186534%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-186534%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20see%20this%20article%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Fdev%2Ftransform%2Fmodernize-connect-to-office365-group%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Fdev%2Ftransform%2Fmodernize-connect-to-office365-group%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-186179%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-186179%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Liana%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20a%20site%20collection%20has%20subsites%2C%20you%20can%20still%20connect%20the%20top-level%20site%20collection%20to%20a%20new%20Office%20365%20Group.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20process%20does%20not%20change%20anything%20structurally%20to%20the%20subsite%20hierarchy%20-%20all%20site%20resources%20will%20continue%20to%20have%20the%20same%20permissions%20they%20did%20prior%20to%20the%20group%20connection%2C%20including%20subsites.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20main%20thing%20to%20be%20aware%20of%20is%20that%20the%20new%20Office%20365%20Group's%20identity%20claims%20will%20be%20added%20to%20the%20site%20collection's%20SP%20permission%20groups%20(i.e.%20group%20owners%20claim%20will%20be%20added%20to%20the%20site%20owners%20permission%20group%2C%20and%20group%20members%20claim%20to%20the%20site%20members%20permission%20group)%2C%20so%20if%20subsites%20have%20inherited%20permissions%20from%20the%20root%2C%20the%20group%20owners%20and%20members%20will%20have%20the%20appropriate%20permissions%20there.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20permissions%20inheritance%20was%20broken%20and%20the%20SP%20groups%20for%20site%20owners%20and%20members%20were%20removed%2C%20then%20the%20side%20effect%20you%20would%20see%20is%20that%20anyone%20added%20to%20the%20Office%20365%20group's%20owners%20or%20members%20would%20not%20have%20access%20to%20the%20site.%20%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHope%20this%20helps.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3ETejas%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F67196%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Liana%20Johnson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3EI've%20read%20over%20and%20over%20again%20that%20subsites%20are%20not%20recommended%20for%20Groups%20and%20their%20modern%20sites.%20For%20most%20collections%20that%20use%20subsites%2C%20how%20will%20%22Groupification%2C%22%20affect%20those%20subsites%3F%20Are%20there%20any%20issues%20we%20should%20expect%20to%20see%20for%20any%20corresponding%20subsite%3F%20I%20am%20concerned%20that%20groupification%20will%20negatively%20impact%20collection%20subsites.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-186151%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-186151%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI've%20read%20over%20and%20over%20again%20that%20subsites%20are%20not%20recommended%20for%20Groups%20and%20their%20modern%20sites.%20For%20most%20collections%20that%20use%20subsites%2C%20how%20will%20%22Groupification%2C%22%20affect%20those%20subsites%3F%20Are%20there%20any%20issues%20we%20should%20expect%20to%20see%20for%20any%20corresponding%20subsite%3F%20I%20am%20concerned%20that%20groupification%20will%20negatively%20impact%20collection%20subsites.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-174813%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-174813%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIt's%20still%20listed%20as%20March%20CY2018%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fproducts.office.com%2Fen-us%2Fbusiness%2Foffice-365-roadmap%3Ffilters%3D%26amp%3Bfeatureid%3D16035%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fproducts.office.com%2Fen-us%2Fbusiness%2Foffice-365-roadmap%3Ffilters%3D%26amp%3Bfeatureid%3D16035%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-168836%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-168836%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIs%20there%20any%20update%20here%3F%20%22Later%20this%20year%22%20was%20almost%2010%20months%20ago.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-149956%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-149956%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20-%20yes%2C%20this%20feature%20will%20be%20admin%20controlled.%26nbsp%3B%20There%20will%20be%20a%20setting%20that%20determines%20whether%20the%20feature%20is%20activated%20for%20a%20tenant%2C%20and%20then%20the%20feature%20itself%20will%20be%20available%20to%20site%20admins.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHope%20this%20helps.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETejas%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F13636%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40CC%20Adeyemo%3C%2FA%3E%20wrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F67%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Christophe%20Fiessinger%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwill%20%22Groupifying%22%20a%20SharePoint%20site%20be%20a%20admin%20controlled%20feature%3F%20If%20not%2C%20this%20will%20completely%20change%20how%20we%20manage%20our%20SharePoint%20Online%20environment.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-149874%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-149874%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F67%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Christophe%20Fiessinger%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwill%20%22Groupifying%22%20a%20SharePoint%20site%20be%20a%20admin%20controlled%20feature%3F%20If%20not%2C%20this%20will%20completely%20change%20how%20we%20manage%20our%20SharePoint%20Online%20environment.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146421%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tejas%20Mehta%3C%2FA%3E%20shared%20the%20following%20timeline%20at%20Ignite%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmyignite.microsoft.com%2Fsessions%2F59122%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmyignite.microsoft.com%2Fsessions%2F59122%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20%22early%202018%22%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F27028i4727DD8D7D8F507D%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22Groupifytimeline.JPG%22%20title%3D%22Groupifytimeline.JPG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146417%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146417%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20usually%20post%20here%20and%20on%20twitter%20to%20gather%20more%20attention%20and%20a%20faster%20response.%20But%20I%20agree%2C%20this%20was%20announced%20eons%20ago%20and%20still%20nothing%2C%20plus%20I've%20been%20planning%20my%20role%20out%20of%20Groups%20contingent%20on%20this%20functionality.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146386%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146386%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EMy%20thoughts%20exactly.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20it%20has%20been%20there%20some%20time%20(added%20in%20June%20last%20year)%20but%20apparently%20it%20has%20been%20updated%20yesterday%20and%20now%20the%20ETA%20is%20Q1%20CY2018%20so%20fingers%20crossed!%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20It%20would%20be%20nice%20to%20hear%20some%20insights%20from%20the%20product%20group%20here%20in%20the%20tech%20community%20as%20this%20should%20be%20place%20where%20IT%20experts%20and%20customers%20could%20get%20closer%20to%20the%20product%20group%20and%20development%2C%20and%20not%20just%20follow%20general%20road%20map%20items.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146353%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146353%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYes%20I%20know%20that.%20Most%20of%20the%20Team%20Sites%20we%20use%20are%20separate%20Site%20Collections%20with%20just%20few%20having%20subwebs%20(subsites).%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146330%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146330%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENot%20sure%20if%20it%20helps%20but%20it%20seems%20that%26nbsp%3Bthe%20item%20is%20on%20the%20Office%20365%20roadmap%20under%20the%20name%20'SharePoint%3A%20connect%20an%20existing%20site%20to%20a%20new%20Office%20365%20group'%20and%20currently%20under%20development.%20You%20can%20find%20the%20roadmap%20here%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fproducts.office.com%2Fen-us%2Fbusiness%2Foffice-365-roadmap%3Ffilters%3D%2526freeformsearch%3Dconnect%2520an%2520existing%2520site%2520to%2520a%2520new%2520Office%2520365%2520group%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fproducts.office.com%2Fen-us%2Fbusiness%2Foffice-365-roadmap%3Ffilters%3D%2526freeformsearch%3Dconnect%2520an%2520existing%2520site%2520to%2520a%2520new%2520Office%2520365%2520group%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-146163%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-146163%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHey%20Teemu%2C%20are%20they%20all%20separate%20site%20collections%3F%20Just%20wanted%20to%20make%20sure%20you%20know%20that%20the%20proposed%20solution%20is%20only%20for%20site%20collections%20and%20cannot%20be%20applied%20to%20subsites.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-145788%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-145788%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYesterday%20it%20was%20%3CSTRONG%3Eeight%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20months%20since%20this%20was%20announced%2C%20how%20long%20do%20we%20need%20to%20wait%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tejas%20Mehta%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Band%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F67%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Christophe%20Fiessinger%3C%2FA%3E%3F%20We%20have%20hundreds%20of%20classic%20Team%20Sites%20which%20we%20would%20like%20to%20modernize%20to%20get%20them%20smoothly%20connected%20with%20Teams%20and%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142735%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142735%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWhen%20exactly%20is%20this%20being%20rolled%20out%3F%20It%20was%20announced%20during%20Ignite%20in%20September.%20It's%20been%203.5%20months%20with%20still%20no%20estimate%20date%20when%20to%20be%20rolled%20out%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20have%20been%20planning%20my%20rollouts%20based%20on%20this%20announcement%20to%20avoid%20migrating%20sites.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI'd%20really%20appreciate%20a%20more%20SMART%20goal%2C%20with%20specifics%20as%20to%20when%20we%20can%20expect%20this%20to%20be%20usable.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142486%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142486%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EGreat%20news.%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhen%20can%20we%20expect%20this%20feature%20to%20be%20rolled%20out.%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20read%20%22later%20this%20year%22%20on%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.office.com%2Fen-us%2F2017%2F05%2F16%2Fnew-sharepoint-and-onedrive-capabilities-accelerate-your-digital-transformation-2%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fblogs.office.com%2Fen-us%2F2017%2F05%2F16%2Fnew-sharepoint-and-onedrive-capabilities-accelerate-your-digital-transformation-2%2F%3C%2FA%3E%20but%20nothing%20yet%20as%20of%20today%20right%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3EI'm%20planning%20to%20write%20some%20internal%20policy%20and%20I%20need%20to%20know%20when%20this%20can%20be%20expected%20to%20be%20available.%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142228%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142228%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ENo%2C%20ability%20to%20add%20a%20Group%20to%20classic%20SPO%20sites%20means%20to%20add%20it%20to%20site%20collections...there%20are%20not%20plans%20to%20add%20Groups%20to%20subsites%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142197%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142197%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAn%20existing%20team%20site%20if%20it%20is%20a%20subsite%20of%20a%20site%20collection%3F%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tejas%20Mehta%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142105%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142105%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20all!%26nbsp%3B%20We%20are%20absolutely%20working%20on%20a%20feature%20that%20will%20connect%20an%20existing%20classic%20team%20site%20to%20a%20new%20Office%20365%20Group.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20had%20a%20session%20at%20Ignite%20that%20covers%20the%20mechanics%20in%20more%20detail%20-%20you%20can%20have%20a%20look%20at%20this%20session%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fchannel9.msdn.com%2FEvents%2FIgnite%2FMicrosoft-Ignite-Orlando-2017%2FBRK2434%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fchannel9.msdn.com%2FEvents%2FIgnite%2FMicrosoft-Ignite-Orlando-2017%2FBRK2434%3C%2FA%3E%20and%20the%20'groupify'%20portion%20starts%20at%20around%20the%2019%3A13%20mark%20of%20the%20video.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141732%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141732%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThat's%20what%20we're%20waiting%20for.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ENote%20that%20it%20will%20only%20work%20for%20sites%2C%20not%20webs%20%2F%20sub-sites%20...%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.ibs.com%2F2017%2F10%2F17%2Fconnecting-existing-sites-to-office-365-groups-kind-of%2F%26nbsp%3B%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fblogs.ibs.com%2F2017%2F10%2F17%2Fconnecting-existing-sites-to-office-365-groups-kind-of%2F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141723%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141723%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENew%20OG%20groups%20are%20either%20created%20in%20the%20Office%20Admin%20Centre%2C%20or%20in%20the%20Outlook%20Groups%20part%20of%20Outlook's%20menus%2C%20or%20when%20you%20create%20a%20Team%2C%20or%20when%20you%20launch%20%22SharePoint%22%20from%20the%20Office%20365%20app%20launcher%20(waffle%20menu).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EOld%20SP%20sites%20are%20created%20as%20you've%26nbsp%3Bdescribed%20above.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20classic%20sites%20probably%20reside%20in%20a%20different%20corner%20of%20MS's%20Office%20365%20datacentre%20from%20the%20OG%20sites%2C%20both%20with%20respect%20to%20where%20the%20data%20is%20and%20the%20admin%20functionality%20that%20manages%20them.%26nbsp%3B%20Notice%20the%20OG%20sites%20don't%20appear%20in%20the%20list%20of%20SP%20sites%20in%20the%20Office%20365%20SharePoint%20Admin%20Centre.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThis%20is%20another%20reason%20-%20over%20and%20above%20the%20differing%20SP%20site%20templates%20-%20why%20MS%20will%20have%20to%20work%20quite%20hard%20to%20produce%20an%20upgrade%20or%20%22magic%20merge%22%20solution%3A%26nbsp%3B%20The%20two%20systems%20and%20data%20areas%20are%20separate%2C%20and%20therefore%20data%20will%20have%20to%20be%20copied%20between%20the%20two.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20process%20will%20likely%20not%20be%20able%20to%20happen%20in%20place.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141706%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141706%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Esorry%2C%20just%20one%20other%20thing...%20I%20notice%20from%20this%20article%20is%20more%20like%20what%20I'm%20expecting%20(see%20section%2C%20'Connect%20an%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20site%20to%20a%20new%20Office%20365%20group')%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSharePoint-Blog%2FWork-better-together-with-SharePoint-team-sites-Office-365-app%2Fba-p%2F109550%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FSharePoint-Blog%2FWork-better-together-with-SharePoint-team-sites-Office-365-app%2Fba-p%2F109550%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141704%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141704%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThe%20%22connecting%22%20piece%2C%20i.e.%20in%20addition%20to%20permissions%2C%20can%20only%20be%20achieved%20thus%20far%20by%20some%20form%20of%20linky%20type%20navigation%20integration.%26nbsp%3B%20Intertwining%20the%20menus%20on%20one%20site%20and%20the%20other%2C%20giving%20the%20appearance%20of%20merging%20the%20two%2C%20sort%20of%20thing.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20one%20suggested%20above%20was%20to%20use%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%20A%20Team%20has%20its%20intrinsic%20new%20OG%20site.%26nbsp%3B%20And%20this%20is%20the%20site%20that%26nbsp%3Bthe%20link%20on%20the%20Team%20tab%20called%20%22Files%22%20goes%20to.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20you%20can%20add%20another%20tab%20to%20the%20Team%20called%20Old%20Files%20and%20link%20that%20to%20the%20old%20classic%20SP%20site.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThen%20on%20the%20left%20nav%20%2F%20quick%20launch%20of%20both%20old%20and%20new%20sites%20put%20all%20the%20same%20menu%20items%20%2F%20links%20on%20both%20old%20and%20new%20sites.%26nbsp%3B%20You%20could%20indent%20the%20old%20and%20new%20libraries%20on%20the%20menu%20one%20above%20the%20other.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20the%20Contoso%20scenario%20might%20look%20like%20this%3A%20-%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EV%20Documents%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3BOld%20Documents%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EV%20Finance%20Docs%20Library%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3BOld%20Finance%20Docs%20Library%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20the%20user%20clicks%20on%20%22Old%20Documents%22%20they're%20taken%20to%20the%20%22Old%20Documents%22%20library%20on%20the%20old%20site.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20because%20the%20left%20nav%20%2F%20quick%20launch%20menu%20looks%20identical%20on%20both%20old%20and%20new%20sites%2C%20they%20don't%20perceive%20the%20click%20through%20as%20a%20site-to-site%20navigation.%26nbsp%3B%20Rather%20the%20old%20library%20looks%20like%20a%20sub-folder%20of%20the%20new%20library%2C%20and%20the%20click%20through%20appears%20as%20merely%20navigating%20to%20the%20sub-folder%20in%20the%20same%20site.%26nbsp%3B%20(That%20visual%20trick%20%2F%20technique%20is%20quite%20useful%20for%20when%20you%20hit%20the%205000%20limit%20on%20libraries%26nbsp%3Btoo%2C%20splitting%20out%20the%20biggest%20root%20level%20folders%20into%20their%20own%20libraries%20and%20indenting%20them%20below%20the%20original%20library%20on%20the%20left%20nav%20%2F%20quick%20launch%20from%20whence%20they%20came).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAnd%20if%20the%20permissions%20setup%20is%20done%20as%20above%20and%20doesn't%20hinder%20them%2C%20they%20might%2C%20as%20one%20user%20said%20to%20me%2C%20wonder%20if%20the%20migration%20has%20already%20been%20done%3A%20%22Why%20did%20you%20bring%20the%20old%20folders%20over%20into%20a%20sub-folder%20of%20the%20new%20library%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Couldn't%20you%20have%20copied%20them%20to%20the%20root%3F%22%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ENo%2C%20of%20course%2C%20the%20users%2C%20or%20me%2C%20or%20someone%20has%20still%20got%20to%20lift%20those%20folders%20across.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20is%20not%20a%20%22magic%20merge%22%20or%20groupification%20%2F%20teamification%20upgrade%20of%20an%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20site.%26nbsp%3B%20That's%20what%20we're%20waiting%20for%20from%20Redmond.%26nbsp%3B%20But%20at%20least%20Teams%2C%20the%20menu%20interleaving%2C%20and%20permissions%20tricks%20gives%20the%20perception%20of%20progress%2C%20integration%2C%20and%20old-new%20hybrid-ity%20quite%26nbsp%3Bearly%20on%20in%20the%20project.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EOn%20the%20subject%20of%20the%20so-and-so's%20getting%20the%20actual%20job%20done%2C%20looks%20like%20they've%20missed%20the%20%22this%20year%22%20deadline.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20suspect%20it%20might%20be%20quite%20a%20bit%20trickier%20than%20they%20thought.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20new%20OG%20site%20and%20old%20%22classic%22%20site%20are%20two%20totally%20different%20SP%20site%20templates.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20project%20to%20deliver%20the%20new%20OG%20sites%20was%20probably%20all%20done%20in%20an%20Agile%2F%20Scrum-ish%20sort%20of%20way%2C%20with%20no-one%20lifting%20their%20head%20above%20the%20tactical%20parapet%20of%20the%20new%20OG%20world%20user%20story%20backlog%20to%20ascertain%20what%20strategic%20chaos%20it%20might%20cause%20for%20migrating%20%2F%20upgrading%20from%20the%20old%20world.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EGo%20on%20Redmond%2C%20prove%20me%20wrong.%26nbsp%3B%20Tell%20me%20you%20can%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3E%22magic%20merge%22%20or%20groupify%20%2F%20teamify%20%2F%20upgrade%20an%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20site%20on%20patch%20Tuesday%20next%20week!%20...%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141698%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141698%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESo%2C%20here%2C%20as%20an%20example%20is%20what%20I%20see%20when%20I%20go%20and%20setup%20a%20SharePoint%20Site...%20if%20this%20is%20the%20classic%20experience%20what%20is%20the%20'new'%20experience%20where%20a%20site%26nbsp%3B%3CEM%3Eis%3C%2FEM%3E%20connected%20to%20an%20Office%20365%20group%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20777px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F26382i022B8C289E4C6892%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%222018-01-04%2016_25_53-New%20SharePoint%20Site.png%22%20title%3D%222018-01-04%2016_25_53-New%20SharePoint%20Site.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141630%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141630%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EExcellent!%20thanks%20Lawrence%20-%20for%20some%20reason%20in%20my%20mind%20I%20had%20thought%20that%20the%20%22connecting%22%20of%20classic%20site%20to%20OG%20was%20somehow%20where%20the%20sites%2FURLs%20would%20become%20connected%2Fmerged%20somehow%20-%20eg.%3CBR%20%2F%3EOG%20group%20%3A%20TEAMA%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fourtenant.sharepoint.com%2Fsites%2FTEAMA%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fourtenant.sharepoint.com%2Fsites%2FTEAMA%3C%2FA%3E)%3CBR%20%2F%3ESP%20Site%20%3A%20TEAMA%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fourtenant.sharepoint.com%2Fsites%2FBU%2FTEAMA%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fourtenant.sharepoint.com%2Fsites%2FBU%2FTEAMA%3C%2FA%3E)%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E...somehow%20the%20two%20could%20link%20so%20they%20didn't%20have%20%22separate%22%20SharePoint%20sites...%20%3CBR%20%2F%3ESo%20from%20what%20you're%20saying%20the%20connecting%20of%20these%20is%20en%20essence%20to%20do%20with%20assoication%20by%20security%20group%20permissions%20rather%20than%20some%20fancy%20magical%20merge...%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141609%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141609%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Baronne%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELet's%20say%20your%20old%20%22classic%22%20site%20is%20called%20Old-Contoso%2C%20and%20it%20has%20the%20usual%203x%20SP%20Groups%3A%20Old-Contoso%20Owners%2C%20Old-Contoso%20Members%2C%20Old-Contoso%20Visitors.%26nbsp%3B%20You%20manage%20members%20of%20the%20SPG's%20in%20the%20usual%20manner%2C%20by%20selecting%20security%20principals%20from%20the%20people%20picker.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAnd%20you've%20got%20a%20new%20Office%20Group%20called%20New-Contoso.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20this%20comes%20with%20its%20own%20membership%20management%2C%20surfaced%20in%20the%20Office%20365%20Admin%20Centre%20-%26gt%3B%20Groups%2C%20and%20also%20in%20the%20Outlook%20Groups%20presentation%20of%20the%26nbsp%3BOG%20functionality.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20you%20go%20to%20the%20Old-Contoso%20SP%20site%20-%26gt%3B%20Site%20Settings%20-%26gt%3B%20People%20and%20Groups%2C%20and%20select%20one%20of%20the%20SPG's%2C%20say%20Old-Contoso%20Members%2C%20then%20add%20a%20new%20user%2C%20the%20people%20picker%20will%20let%20you%20select%20the%26nbsp%3BOG's%26nbsp%3Blike%20they%20were%20users.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20you%20add%20an%26nbsp%3BOG%20to%20an%20SPG%2C%20the%20members%20of%20the%20OG%20membership%20gets%20the%20access%20that%20the%20SPG%20has%20to%20sites%2C%20libraries%2C%20folders%2C%20and%20docs%20in%20the%20Old-Contoso%20site.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELikewise%2C%20if%20you%20go%20to%20a%20site%2C%20library%2C%20folder%2C%20or%20document%20in%20the%20Old-Contoso%20site%2C%20and%20disinherit%20its%20permissions%20from%20its%20parent%2C%20and%20add%20permissions%2C%20the%20people%20picker%20will%20allow%20you%20to%20add%20an%20OG%20and%20grant%20it%20permissions.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESo%20you%20can%20use%20OG's%2C%20for%20example%20the%20New-Contoso%20OG%2C%20to%20puppet%20master%20the%20permission%20across%20your%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20sites%2C%20for%20example%20Old-Contoso%2C%20by%20adding%20the%20OG's%20as%20members%20of%20the%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20sites'%20SPG's%2C%20or%20by%20directly%20granting%20the%20OG's%20access%20permissions%20on%20the%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3Eold%20%22classic%22%20SP%20sites'%20containers%20(sites%2C%20libraries%2C%20folders)%20and%20documents.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3ESo%20in%20a%20migration%20or%20hybrid%20you%20can%20manually%20configure%20the%20OG's%20to%20duplicate%20the%20old%20permissions%20by%20creating%20OG's%20with%20memberships%2C%20adding%20them%20to%20the%20old%20sites%20SPG's%2C%20containers%2C%20and%20documents%20permissions.%26nbsp%3B%20Then%20delete%20the%20old%20memberships%20of%20old%20SPG's.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EThe%20old%20sites%20and%20SPG's%20are%20then%20security%20%22zombies%22%20from%20a%20group%20membership%20point%20of%20view.%26nbsp%3B%20All%20granting%20of%20collective%20permissions%20is%20made%20by%20member%20management%20of%20the%20new%20OG's%2C%20and%20by%20granting%20permissions%20of%20those%20OG's%20onto%20the%20resources%20of%20the%20old%20sites.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Ethanks%20Lawrence%2C%20I'm%20maybe%20being%20a%20little%20thick%20here%2C%20but%20I%20see%20the%20words%20you're%20saying%20about%20migration%20and%20teams%20and%20classic%20and%20groups%20etc.%20-%20but%20if%20you%20don't%20mind%20could%20you%20clarify%20how%20I%20would%20go%20about%20going%20from%20our%20current%20SharePoint%20Online%20%22classic%22%20sites%20to%20somehow%20them%20being%20linked%20to%20or%20as%20groups.%20Do%20I%20need%20to%20contact%20Microsoft%20or%20something%20I%20am%20not%20clear%20on%20how%20you%20do%20it....%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141360%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141360%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThat's%20a%20handy%20integration%20during%20a%20migration%3A%20using%20Teams%20as%20a%20portal%20to%20tab-aggregate%20the%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20site%20with%20the%20new%20%22group%22%20site%2C%20and%20drop%20the%20new%20Teamified%20Office%20365%20group%20security%20principal%20into%20the%20required%20SP%20group%20of%20the%20old%20%22classic%22%20SP%20site%2C%20but%20...%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDon't%20let%20Redmond%20off%20the%20hook!%26nbsp%3B%20Those%20so-and-so's%20will%20do%20anything%20to%20get%20you%20off%20the%20line!%26nbsp%3B%20If%20you%20don't%20want%20to%20migrate%2C%20and%20do%20want%20to%20Groupify-Teamify%20an%20existing%20%22classic%22%20site%20to%20save%20unnecessary%20hours%20of%20extra%20migration%20work%20with%20users%2C%20make%20MS%20work%20for%20it.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141324%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141324%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EFor%26nbsp%3Bmigration%20scenarios%20with%20nested%20sites%20and%20where%20the%20Teams%20functionality%20is%20also%20required%3A%26nbsp%3Bit%26nbsp%3Bcould%20be%26nbsp%3Ban%20option%26nbsp%3Bto%20grant%20access%20separately%20to%20the%20SP%20sites%2C%20and%20%22Teamify%22%26nbsp%3Bthe%20O365%20groups%26nbsp%3Bwhere%20Teams%20make%20sense%20and%20the%20group%20is%20to%20interact%20across%26nbsp%3Bthe%20collaboration%20and%20communication%26nbsp%3Bapps.%26nbsp%3BLinks%20can%20be%20added%20to%26nbsp%3Bthe%20above%20mentioned%20Sharepoint%20sub%20webs%20to%20the%20Teams'%20tabs.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141323%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141323%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Ehow%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141300%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141300%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ESorry%2C%20but%20I'm%20not%20following%20you%20here%3A%20can%20you%20elaborate%20what%20you%20mean%3F%20You%20can%20add%20Office%20365%20Groups%20to%20your%20SPO%20Subsites%20security%20configuration%20with%20no%20problems%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-141243%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-141243%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIf%20there%20is%20a%20need%20to%20add%20existing%20O365%20groups%20to%20Sharepoint%20subsites%2C%20there%20is%20always%20the%20possiblity%20to%20grant%20access%20to%20the%20AD%20Seurity%20group%20equivalent%20of%20the%20O365%20group%20via%20the%20site's%20SharePoint%20group.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-140927%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-140927%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIt%20hasn't%20yet.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-138787%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-138787%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHas%20this%20feature%20landed%20yet%20-%20I%20cannot%20see%20any%20way%20to%20connect%20our%20SharePoint%20Team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-121160%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-121160%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20really%20don't%20think%20the%20%22purpose%22%20of%20the%20channel-level%20permissions%20is%20set%20up%20to%20align%20to%20sub-sites.%20And%20that%20level%20of%20mapping%20would%20be%20a%20nightmare.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EIn%20reality%2C%20I%20believe%20based%20on%20the%20way%20Groups%20and%20Teams%20has%20been%20%22architected%22%2C%20doing%20mini-migrations%20into%20a%20logical%20NEW%20setup%20is%20the%20right%20way%20to%20do%20this.%20Everything%20else%20may%20end%20up%20being%20more%20painful%20in%20the%20long%20run.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EChannel%20level%20permissions%20will%20help%20with%20what%20Andrew%20was%20mentioning%2C%20but%20again%2C%20I%20still%20think%20there%20is%20lots%20of%20rework%20in%20your%20future.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-121072%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-121072%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThere's%20a%20user%20voice%20for%20that%20one%2C%20and%20MS%20are%20apparently%20working%20on%20it%3A%20-%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fanswers.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmsoffice%2Fforum%2Fmsoffice_o365admin-mso_teams-mso_o365b%2Fmicrosoft-teams-member-access-permissions-to%2Fbd9e1050-70de-47a4-bbb1-Mmm%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fanswers.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmsoffice%2Fforum%2Fmsoffice_o365admin-mso_teams-mso_o365b%2Fmicrosoft-teams-member-access-permissions-to%2Fbd9e1050-70de-47a4-bbb1-Mmm%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20that's%26nbsp%3B%2001d6edb182e6%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16911079-support-for-private-channels%26nbsp%3B%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16911079-support-for-private-channels%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHopefully%20whatever%20users%20%2F%20groups%20%2F%20permissions%20functionality%20MS%20put%20into%20Teams%20for%20Channels%20it%20will%20have%20an%20API%20too.%26nbsp%3B%20Then%20we%20can%20code%20something%20to%20sync%20permissions%20between%20the%20SP%20sub-Webs%20to%20the%20corresponding%20Channel.%26nbsp%3B%20For%20example%2C%20the%20SP%20sub-Web%20Members%20group%20syncs%20its%20membership%20to%20the%20corresponding%20Channel's%20%22group%22%20(or%20whatever%20they%20call%20groups%20in%20the%26nbsp%3Busers%20%2F%20groups%20%2F%20permissions%20functionality%20for%20Teams%20and%20Channels)%20thereby%20granting%20permissions%20to%20the%20conversation%20for%20the%20Channel%20only%20to%20the%20members%20of%20the%20SP%20sub-Web's%20members%20group.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-121045%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-121045%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20wouldn't%20work%20for%20us.%20We%20have%20a%20handful%20of%20site%20collections%20all%20of%20which%20have%20hundreds%20of%20subsites%20under%20them.%20Because%20there's%20no%20way%20to%20set%20permissions%20per%20channel%2C%20everyone%20would%20be%20able%20to%20see%20everyone's%20conversations%20etc.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-121043%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-121043%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20Tejas%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EYou%20say%20%22One%20is%20a%20migration%20effort%20from%20subsite%20to%20root%20site%20collection%2C%20and%20then%20connecting%20the%20collection%20to%20a%20new%20group%20with%20the%20feature%20described%20in%20this%20thread.%22%20would%20it%20be%20just%20as%20easy%20to%20create%20a%20group%20and%20then%20migrate%20the%20data%20from%20old%20team%20site%20to%20the%20new%20group%3F%20Are%20there%20any%20disadvantages%20to%20this%20over%20your%20suggested%20method%3F%20I%20understand%20that%20site%20collections%20created%20using%20my%20suggested%20method%20won't%20appear%20in%20the%20site%20collection%20list%20for%20administrators%2C%20but%20I%20believe%20this%20is%20on%20the%20way%20anyway.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-121030%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-121030%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWe're%20also%20not%20going%20to%20benefit%20much%20from%20the%20ability%20to%20convert%20site%20collections%2C%20we%20definitely%20need%20the%20ability%20to%20convert%20subsites%2C%20else%20we're%20going%20to%20have%20to%20do%20a%20heck%20of%20a%20lot%20of%20migration.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-120101%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-120101%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYou%20might%20try%20mapping%20Channels%20from%20Teams%20to%20the%20sub-webs%20of%20your%20Site%20(site%20collection).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETeam%2C%20Group%2C%20and%20Site%20are%20all%20a%20one-to-one%20relationship.%26nbsp%3B%20Probably%20best%20we%20keep%20it%20that%20way%20or%20we%20might%20all%20go%20mad.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20for%20example%2C%20if%20%22Products%22%20is%20the%20subject%20matter%2C%20then%20there's%20one%20Team%20%2F%20Group%20%2F%20Site%20called%20Products.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHowever%2C%20there%20is%20a%20one-to-many%20relationship%20between%20a%20Team%20and%20its%20sub-Channels.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAnd%20there's%20a%20one-to-many%20between%20a%20Site%20(site%20collection)%20and%20its%20sub-Webs.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20you%20can%20create%20a%26nbsp%3BChannel%20(sub-Team%2C%20so%20to%20speak)%20for%20each%20sub-Web%20(sub-Site).%26nbsp%3B%20Then%20add%20a%20tab%20in%20the%20Channel%20that%20connects%20to%20the%20corresponding%20sub-web%2C%20and%20put%20a%20link%20back%20to%20the%20corresponding%20Channel%20from%20the%20left%20nav%20(Quick%20Launch)%20of%20the%20sub-web.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20Channels%20then%20map%20the%20augmented%20functionality%20for%26nbsp%3Bconversations%20etc.%20to%20the%20sub-webs%20on%20one-to-one%20basis.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%20for%20each%20actual%20product%20sub-Web%20(Grommet%2C%20Rivet%2C%20Bracket%2C%20etc.)%20you%20might%20have%20below%20the%20Products%20Site%2C%20there's%20a%20corresponding%20Channel%20(Grommet%2C%20Rivet%2C%20Bracket%2C%20etc.)%20below%20the%20Products%20Team.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI'm%20just%20waiting%20for%20the%20programmatical%20interface%20to%20Teams%20to%20become%20available%20before%20setting%20up%20some%20automation%20provisioning%20whereby%20the%20associated%20Channels%20are%20created%20automatically%20from%20the%20sub-Webs.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20will%20work%20for%20Customers%2C%20Suppliers%2C%20Employees%2C%20as%20well%20as%20Products%2C%20where%20the%20one-to-many-ness%20abounds.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-117833%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-117833%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EBrent%20-%20do%20you%20mind%20giving%20the%20name%20of%20the%20migration%20tool%20that%20you%20bought%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-111739%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-111739%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHello%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3EIt's%20super%20challenging%20for%20us%20to%20create%20groups%2Fteams%20w%20default%20email%20assignments.%20We%20had%20a%20name%20change%2C%20but%20aren't%20changing%20the%20domain.%20In%20creating%20users%2C%20we%20can%20simply%20add%20the%20alias.%20Without%20this%20option%20in%20groups%2Fteams%2C%20it's%20defaulting%20to%20an%20%40%20address%20that%20isn't%20our%20common%20use.%20Is%20there%20a%20way%20to%20add%20an%20alias%20group%20email%20address%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-110779%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-110779%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20Christophe%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAny%20update%20re.%20timing%20of%20SC%20link%20to%20groups%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3EJC%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-100788%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-100788%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tejas%20Mehta%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you%20for%20such%20a%20quick%20response.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat%20is%20a%20real%20problem%20for%20us.%20I%20appreciate%20some%20of%20the%20challenges%20that%20you%20have%20flagged.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20our%20specific%20case%2C%20the%20permission%20inheritance%20aspects%20are%20not%20such%20a%20big%20deal.%20We've%20architected%20our%20sites%20and%20sub-sites%20this%20way%20more%20so%20for%20the%20IA%20aspects%20rather%20than%20the%20permission%20inheritance%2C%20i.e.%20we%20make%20more%20use%20of%20Site%20Collection%20Content%20Types%2C%20Site%20Columns%20etc%2C%20so%20that%20each%20set%20of%20sub-sites%20pull%20from%20their%20specific%20set%20of%20common%20js%20and%20css%20etc.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20guess%2C%20what%20we%20want%20to%20know%20is%20that.%20In%20the%20Groups%20interface%20can%20change%20the%20link%20behind%20the%20Files%20and%20Notebook%20links%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eand%20future%20in%20Teams%20-%20change%20the%20Files%20link%20or%20remove%20it%20so%20we%20can%20add%20our%20own%20Files%20link.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETo%20answer%20your%20question.%20Right%20now%2C%20do%20to%20Self-Services%20site%20creation%20process%20we%20have%20over%202%2C000%20sites%20collection.%20However%2C%20we%20are%20planning%20to%20link%20our%20solution%20to%20automate%20the%20creation%20of%20these%20sub-sites%20based%20on%20business%20rules%20in%20our%20Enterprise%20Data%20Warehouse%2C%20so%20when%20a%20Job%20or%20Lead%20reaches%20a%20particular%20business%20state%20the%20tools%20like%2C%20the%20SharePoint%20site%2C%20Group%20calendar%2Femail%20etc..%20and%20permissions%20to%20them%20are%20provisioned%2C%20so%20that%20they%20are%20available%20at%20the%20time%20of%20when%20they%20needed.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20will%20be%20testing%20this%20with%20one%20part%20of%20our%20business%20this%20year%20which%20will%20result%20in%20a%20run%20rate%20of%20around%201%2C000%20sites%20a%20month%2C%20and%20if%20successful%20we%20will%20look%20to%20expand%20this%20for%20more%20of%20the%20business.%20So%20the%20numbers%20will%20grow%20faster%20early%20next%20year.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-98571%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-98571%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Graham%2C%20thanks%20for%20your%20feedback.%26nbsp%3B%20At%20present%20we%20don't%20have%20plans%20to%20enable%20connection%20of%20subsites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups.%26nbsp%3B%20There%20are%20numerous%20hurdles%20and%20technical%20complexities%20we'd%20need%20to%20overcome%2C%20e.g.%20how%20do%20you%20treat%20group%20privacy%20or%20external%20guest%20access%20to%20parent%20(or%20child)%20sites%20that%20have%20been%20connected%20to%20groups%20themselves%20or%20how%20would%20users%20of%20other%20group%20workloads%20(e.g.%20mailbox)%20expect%20to%20interact%20with%20parent%2Fchild%20resources%20outside%20of%20SharePoint%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Implementing%20the%20corresponding%20constraints%20and%20representing%20them%20in%20a%20way%20that%20site%20owners%20can%20interpret%20meaningfully%20in%20our%20interface%20is%20a%20challenging%20task.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EOut%20of%20curiosity%20-%20are%20you%20anywhere%20near%20500k%20site%20collections%20in%20your%20tenant%2C%20or%20foresee%20breaking%20through%20that%20number%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETejas%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-98401%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-98401%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F67%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Christophe%20Fiessinger%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20I'm%20surprised%20more%20tenancies%20aren't%20making%20use%20of%20sub-sites.%20We%20followed%20our%20same%20onPrem%20architecture%20of%20creating%20a%20few%20top%20level%20site%20collections%20and%20then%20creating%20multiple%20site%20collections%20under%20them.%20The%20ability%20to%20connect%20a%20Group%20to%20a%20Sub-Site%20is%20going%20to%20be%20critical%20to%20our%20business%20given%20the%20subsites%20in%20the%20structure%20of%20PPPM%20(%20Portfolio%2C%20Programme%2C%20Project%20management)%20processes%20we%20follow.%3CBR%20%2F%3EIs%20this%20something%20Microsoft%20are%20considering%2C%20on%20their%20roadmap%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20also%20did%20it%20this%20way%20to%20work%20within%20the%202%2C000%20subsite%20per%20site%20collection%20limit%2C%20while%20also%20maximising%20our%20protection%20from%20the%20500%2C000%20limit%20of%20site%20collections%20per%20tenancy.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20advice%20%2F%20guidance%20-%20greatly%20appreciated%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-79834%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-79834%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESitecollection%20'Projects'%20and%20underlying%20project%20sites%20(or%20'Teams'%20and%20team%20sites)%20is%20a%20common%20use%20case%20in%20tons%20of%20SharePoint%20real%20world%20implementations.%20So%20we%20would%20easily%20accept%20any%20further%26nbsp%3Brestrictions%20if%20we%20could%20tie%20sub-sites%20to%20teams%20or%20groups.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20not%2C%20the%20implementation%20will%20not%20really%20help.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71411%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71411%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETejas%2C%20We%20would%20need%20subsite%20to%200365%20group%20connection%20and%20my%20understanding%20is%20that%20will%20not%20be%20happening%20just%20Site%20Collection%20to%20group%20connection.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71198%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71198%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe%20create%20site%20collections%20per%20customers%20and%20sub%20sites%20per%20projects.%20Real%20collaboration%20occurs%20on%20project%20so%20I%20was%20expecting%20a%20Group%20at%20the%20project%20level.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20we%20have%20a%20lot%20of%20sites%20(150k%20customers%20%2F%20180k%20projects)%20we%20didn't%20want%20to%20create%20all%20the%20sites%20as%26nbsp%3Bsite%20collection.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20was%20really%20hoping%20for%20sub%20sites%20Groups.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWe%20are%20SharePoint%20Online%20ONLY.%20Each%20regional%20office%20has%20a%20site%20collection%20with%20departments%20and%20projects%20as%20subsites.%20It%20is%20the%20subsites%20that%20we%20need%20connected%20to%200365%20groups%20and%20that%20cannot%20be%20done.%20There%20is%20also%20a%20Committees%20site%20collection%20that%20has%20people%20from%20each%20regional%20office%20and%20all%20sites%20have%20a%20global%20nav.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71192%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71192%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Eno%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71191%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71191%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EChristine%2C%20is%20this%20a%20question%20for%20me%20regarding%20the%20group%20connection%20to%20existing%20site%20collections%3F%26nbsp%3B%20If%20so%2C%20yes%20we%20are%20planning%20to%20provide%20PowerShell%20cmdlet%20to%20achieve%20the%20site-to-group%20connection.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71190%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ECan%20you%20convert%20security%20groups%20to%200365%20groups%20with%20powershell%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71143%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71143%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ENick%2C%20curious%20to%20hear%20more%20about%20your%20scenario%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Our%20plans%20are%20to%20enable%20group%20connection%20for%20classic%20team%20site%20templates%20only.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71063%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71063%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EChristine%20there%20is%20no%20automatic%20upgrade%20mechanism%20to%20convert%20security%20groups%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71040%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71040%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAre%20there%20any%20plans%20to%20connect%20pre-team%20site%20SharePoint%20Online%20sites%20to%20O365%20Groups%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-71022%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-71022%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3BTejas%20Mehta%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20really%20apreciate%20the%20quick%20answer.%26nbsp%3B%20Not%20exactly%20what%20I%20was%20hoping%20since%20we%20have%20many%20subsites%20but%20at%20least%20we%20know%20where%20we%20are%20moving%20to.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20am%20that%20we%20will%20leave%20the%20current%20structure%20%22as%20is%22%20create%20new%200365%20modern%20sites%20and%20just%20put%20a%20hyperlink%20to%20the%20old%20subsites%20sites.%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20is%20very%20easy%20to%20convert%20a%20DL%20to%20an%200365%20group%20but%20all%20our%20permissioning%20and%20mailing%20lists%20are%20mail-enabled%20security%20groups.%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20it%20easy%20to%20convert%20those%20to%200365%20groups%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EChristine%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70903%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70903%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20is%20dissapointing.%20This%20still%20means%20there%20is%20a%20large%20migration%20process%20in%20the%20future%20for%20us%20if%20we%20ever%20want%20to%20start%20using%20groups%20or%20teams%20in%20our%20org.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70901%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70901%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5174%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Christine%20Stack%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwe've%20started%20doing%20what%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8984%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tejas%20Mehta%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bmentioned%20and%20bought%20a%20migration%20tool%20to%20just%20move%20existing%20content%20into%20newly%20created%20Group%20sites%20(root%20site%20collections).%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eim%20super%20suprised%20to%20hear%20the%20stats%20on%20the%20subsites%2C%20weve%20done%20quite%20a%20lot%20and%20even%20more%20since%20the%20expansion%20of%20site%20collection%20sizes.%20we%20typically%20had%20one%20SC%20for%20projects%2C%20one%20for%20workgroups%2C%20one%20for%20each%20operating%20company%2C%20etc.%20%26nbsp%3Bin%20any%20case%20it%20is%20painfully%20clear%20information%20architecture%20is%20dead%2C%20might%20as%20well%20embrace%20it%20%3Agrinning_face%3A%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Efor%20us%20the%20migrations%20arent%20too%20painful%2C%20though%20we%20dont%20have%20a%20lot%20of%20complexity%20in%20the%20sites%20we%20are%20migrating%20(eg%20no%20workflows%20etc)%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70899%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70899%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20all%20-%20yes%20our%20plan%20is%20to%20provide%20the%20ability%20to%20connect%20only%20root%20site%20collections%20to%20new%20Office%20365%20Groups.%26nbsp%3B%20We've%20considered%20enabling%20subsite-to-group%20connections%2C%20but%20there%20are%20enough%20gotchas%20both%20architecturally%20as%20well%20as%20from%20a%20design%20standpoint%20in%20delivering%20an%20experience%20that%20is%20comprehensible%20to%20most%20humans.%26nbsp%3B%20One%20example%20is%20that%20when%20we%20start%20rolling%20out%20classification-based%20policy%20(e.g.%20Confidential%20classification%20equates%20to%20group%20guests%20being%20disabled%2C%20SharePoint%20external%20sharing%20turned%20off%2C%20etc.%20-%20this%20is%20just%20an%20example%20for%20discussion)%2C%20those%20policies%20apply%20at%20the%20site%20collection%20container%20level.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20we%20enabled%20subsite%20connection%20to%20groups%2C%20we%20would%20have%20to%20deal%20with%20site%20parent-child%20policy%20conflicts%2C%20inheritance-based%20permissions%2C%20etc.%26nbsp%3B%20Not%20saying%20it's%20impossible%20but%20cleary%20stands%20in%20the%20way%20of%20shipping%20an%20experience%20sooner.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHaving%20looked%20at%20all%20site%20collections%20in%20the%20service%2C%20the%20vast%20majority%20are%20flat%20(i.e.%20no%20subwebs)%2C%20for%20which%20this%20experience%20should%20work%20seamlessly.%26nbsp%3B%20That%20said%2C%20we%20acknowledge%20that%20there%20are%20some%20very%20active%20site%20collections%20with%20subsite%20hierarchies.%26nbsp%3B%20For%20these%20subwebs%2C%20there%20are%20a%20couple%20of%20paths%20to%20get%20to%20'modern'.%26nbsp%3B%20One%20is%20a%20migration%20effort%20from%20subsite%20to%20root%20site%20collection%2C%20and%20then%20connecting%20the%20collection%20to%20a%20new%20group%20with%20the%20feature%20described%20in%20this%20thread.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20other%2C%20is%20a%20'modernize%20this%20site'%20type%20of%20experience%20that%20brings%20the%20classic%20subsite%20to%20the%20modern%20experiences%20without%20a%20group%20connection.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20is%20also%20a%20body%20of%20work%20we%20are%20investing%20in%20and%20will%20share%20additional%20details%20in%20the%20future.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHope%20this%20helps%20to%20clarify.%26nbsp%3B%20We'll%20definitely%20be%20talking%20more%20about%20this%20in%20the%20coming%20months%20as%20we%20make%20progress%20on%20the%20feature.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70822%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70822%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWait...site%20collections.%26nbsp%3B%20That%20would%20be%20no%20good.%26nbsp%3B%20Our%20site%20collections%20are%20per%20regional%20office%20and%20our%20subsites%20are%20departments.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20NEED%20to%20be%20able%20to%20connect%20an%200365%20group%20to%20a%20sub-site.%26nbsp%3B%20Please%20clarify%20Microsoft.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70477%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70477%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20guess%20so!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-70437%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Ability%20to%20connect%20existing%20SharePoint%20team%20sites%20to%20Office%20365%20Groups%20is%20coming%20later%20this%20year%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-70437%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20assume%20this%20is%20really%20connecting%20existing%20%22SITE%20COLLECTIONS%22%20to%20groups%2C%20and%20not%20sub-sites%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Microsoft

Important sets of announcements today from the SharePoint team, including this specific one coming later this year:

  • The ability to connect existing SharePoint team sites to Office 365 Groups, so you can augment existing sites with shared conversations, calendar and Planner.

https://blogs.office.com/2017/05/16/new-sharepoint-and-onedrive-capabilities-accelerate-your-digital...

74 Replies
I assume this is really connecting existing "SITE COLLECTIONS" to groups, and not sub-sites?

Wait...site collections.  That would be no good.  Our site collections are per regional office and our subsites are departments.  We NEED to be able to connect an 0365 group to a sub-site.  Please clarify Microsoft.

best response confirmed by Christophe Fiessinger (Microsoft)
Solution

Hi all - yes our plan is to provide the ability to connect only root site collections to new Office 365 Groups.  We've considered enabling subsite-to-group connections, but there are enough gotchas both architecturally as well as from a design standpoint in delivering an experience that is comprehensible to most humans.  One example is that when we start rolling out classification-based policy (e.g. Confidential classification equates to group guests being disabled, SharePoint external sharing turned off, etc. - this is just an example for discussion), those policies apply at the site collection container level.  If we enabled subsite connection to groups, we would have to deal with site parent-child policy conflicts, inheritance-based permissions, etc.  Not saying it's impossible but cleary stands in the way of shipping an experience sooner. 

 

Having looked at all site collections in the service, the vast majority are flat (i.e. no subwebs), for which this experience should work seamlessly.  That said, we acknowledge that there are some very active site collections with subsite hierarchies.  For these subwebs, there are a couple of paths to get to 'modern'.  One is a migration effort from subsite to root site collection, and then connecting the collection to a new group with the feature described in this thread.  The other, is a 'modernize this site' type of experience that brings the classic subsite to the modern experiences without a group connection.  This is also a body of work we are investing in and will share additional details in the future.

 

Hope this helps to clarify.  We'll definitely be talking more about this in the coming months as we make progress on the feature.


Thanks 

 

 

 

 @Christine Stack we've started doing what @Tejas Mehta mentioned and bought a migration tool to just move existing content into newly created Group sites (root site collections).  

 

im super suprised to hear the stats on the subsites, weve done quite a lot and even more since the expansion of site collection sizes. we typically had one SC for projects, one for workgroups, one for each operating company, etc.  in any case it is painfully clear information architecture is dead, might as well embrace it :grinning_face:

 

for us the migrations arent too painful, though we dont have a lot of complexity in the sites we are migrating (eg no workflows etc)

This is dissapointing. This still means there is a large migration process in the future for us if we ever want to start using groups or teams in our org. 

 Tejas Mehta,

 

I really apreciate the quick answer.  Not exactly what I was hoping since we have many subsites but at least we know where we are moving to.  I am that we will leave the current structure "as is" create new 0365 modern sites and just put a hyperlink to the old subsites sites.  

 

It is very easy to convert a DL to an 0365 group but all our permissioning and mailing lists are mail-enabled security groups.  Is it easy to convert those to 0365 groups?

 

Christine

Are there any plans to connect pre-team site SharePoint Online sites to O365 Groups?


Christine there is no automatic upgrade mechanism to convert security groups to Office 365 Groups.

Nick, curious to hear more about your scenario?  Our plans are to enable group connection for classic team site templates only.

Can you convert security groups to 0365 groups with powershell?

Christine, is this a question for me regarding the group connection to existing site collections?  If so, yes we are planning to provide PowerShell cmdlet to achieve the site-to-group connection.

We are SharePoint Online ONLY. Each regional office has a site collection with departments and projects as subsites. It is the subsites that we need connected to 0365 groups and that cannot be done. There is also a Committees site collection that has people from each regional office and all sites have a global nav.

We create site collections per customers and sub sites per projects. Real collaboration occurs on project so I was expecting a Group at the project level.

 

As we have a lot of sites (150k customers / 180k projects) we didn't want to create all the sites as site collection.

 

I was really hoping for sub sites Groups.

Tejas, We would need subsite to 0365 group connection and my understanding is that will not be happening just Site Collection to group connection.

Sitecollection 'Projects' and underlying project sites (or 'Teams' and team sites) is a common use case in tons of SharePoint real world implementations. So we would easily accept any further restrictions if we could tie sub-sites to teams or groups.

If not, the implementation will not really help.

@Christophe Fiessinger - I'm surprised more tenancies aren't making use of sub-sites. We followed our same onPrem architecture of creating a few top level site collections and then creating multiple site collections under them. The ability to connect a Group to a Sub-Site is going to be critical to our business given the subsites in the structure of PPPM ( Portfolio, Programme, Project management) processes we follow.
Is this something Microsoft are considering, on their roadmap?

 

We also did it this way to work within the 2,000 subsite per site collection limit, while also maximising our protection from the 500,000 limit of site collections per tenancy.

 

Any advice / guidance - greatly appreciated

 

Hi Graham, thanks for your feedback.  At present we don't have plans to enable connection of subsites to Office 365 Groups.  There are numerous hurdles and technical complexities we'd need to overcome, e.g. how do you treat group privacy or external guest access to parent (or child) sites that have been connected to groups themselves or how would users of other group workloads (e.g. mailbox) expect to interact with parent/child resources outside of SharePoint?  Implementing the corresponding constraints and representing them in a way that site owners can interpret meaningfully in our interface is a challenging task.

 

 

Out of curiosity - are you anywhere near 500k site collections in your tenant, or foresee breaking through that number?

 

Thanks,

Tejas