06-04-2020 07:55 AM
06-04-2020 07:55 AM
I'm struggling with finding a good way to have a shared calendar with our Microsoft Teams team of 100+ members. We'd like to have a shared calendar where things like all the teams standups, demos, testing with users etc are added. This is meant to be for general information so that everyone can decide themselves what they should be part of, or just know that it is happening, rather than the meeting host needs to invite "the right" people. Thus, we don't want everyone in the team to get e-mail invites to each of these events.
We have the Office 365 Group shared calendar automatically showing up (after a lot of work), but find it cumbersome to add events to it without distrubing everyone. The suggested approach seems to be to go into the calendar and create the event there. However, there are a few user experience issues with that:
I really need there to be an easy way of having a shared calendar with events that everyone can see and join in to, but not get an e-mail invite to. I've thought of two possible solutions based on the current functionality of Outlook:
Preferably, I'd like this to be achieved through adding that group as an "attendee" (just as I do with room bookings). The way I thought of to solve this was to create another shared calendar that everyone can edit, but whose team no one is a member of. Unfortunately, it seems like I'm not allowed to set permissions of the shared group calendar in the same way I can do with my own calendars. Thus, I can't give edit access to people that aren't a member of the team.
Another way I thought of would be to disable the calendar invites being sent to the team members. If I understand the documentation of Set-UnifiedGroup correctly, that would be possible through setting -AlwaysSubscribeMembersToCalendarEvents:$false. It says that means "ReplyOnly". However, I don't know for sure what that value means, because it's not really explained. Also, I'm not sure how to set this for exsiting members, as this setting is only for new members.
Any help on how to achieve either of my two solutions are greatly appreciated. And of course, if you can think of any other solution to achieve my goal of an easily adminstered shared calendar that doesn't disturb everyone, I'm all ears.
Oh, and of course...being a former G Suite user, I'd really like there to be a way for the user to set if they wish the event to be modifiable by others or not. But I guess that's just not possible with Microsoft's solution?
06-04-2020 09:03 AM
Unsubscribing users should work, but the question here is are you using the group/team to distribute other types of emails as well? If not, just remove everyone from the subscribers list and toggle the corresponding flags (note you cannot see the "calendar subscribers" list, users will have to handle this on their own).
Another option is to just create a shared mailbox, then change the Default calendar permissions to Editor or similar. That way anyone in the organization can access and edit items within said calendar. They will have to add it manually to Outlook though.
06-08-2020 12:38 AM - edited 06-08-2020 12:53 AM
@Vasil Michev Thank you so much for good ideas!
Just to be clear...
The thoughts in 2.b. makes me wonder if it's better to hack this through creating a "room". That's pretty much the functionality I want - Let the users add this calendar as a participant, and let others see the meeting. However, I'd like there to be a possibility to have overlapping events, since the "room" isn't actually a room...Anyone that can build on this idea to figure out if it would work?
06-08-2020 08:49 AM
1) Yes, as "calendar" subscriptions can only be managed client-side, via OWA - select the Group, … menu, settings, adjust the selection under "manage group email". Outlook only has a single "follow" setting that applies for all messages, not just calendar items.
Via PowerShell, you can only manage this "global" subscribe flag, you cannot select just the "calendar events" one. The cmdlet is Get/Remove-UnifiedGroupLinks
2) Automapping will do, however it will expose not just the Calendar folder, but the entire mailbox, which is probably not something you want for your scenario. And will also contribute to that "many users" issue. "Manually", they can add the calendar only, so they don't clutter their nav pane, and should be fine performance-wise as Microsoft recently adjusted some limits there.
If you want automatic meeting processing, use a room mailbox instead. The setup is the same as with shared mailbox, you just have some additional calendar processing settings to play with. Including handling of "conflicts"/duplicate meetings.
And no, you cannot have calendar without the mailbox.
P.S. You ask too many questions :p