Dec 01 2023 06:35 AM
On my table when I add a new row by using the tab function my last formula before the new row changes and skips the new row. For example: =IF('Water Usage'!D28-'Water Usage'!$D27<0,0,'Water Usage'!D28-'Water Usage'!$D27) is the formula but when I tab for a new row the formula changes to =IF('Water Usage'!D30-'Water Usage'!$D28<0,0,'Water Usage'!D30-'Water Usage'!$D28).
It completely skips D29. The correct formula should be: =IF('Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28<0,0,'Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28).
But when I just input my data below the last row the table grabs that row including it into the table and my formula is fine. No error for inconsistent formula.
Dec 01 2023 08:19 AM
It sounds like you are experiencing issues with your formula references when adding a new row using the Tab key in Excel. This might be related to how Excel handles formulas in tables. Here are a few suggestions to address this:
1. Use Table References:
If you are working with Excel tables (ListObjects), make sure your formula references are consistent with table references. When you use the Tab key to add a new row in a table, Excel automatically extends the formulas for the new row based on the pattern it detects in the existing formulas.
For example, if your formula is in cell A1:
=IF('Water Usage'!D28-'Water Usage'!$D27<0,0,'Water Usage'!D28-'Water Usage'!$D27)
and you're entering it in a table, Excel will likely extend it when a new row is added, creating something like:
=IF('Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28<0,0,'Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28)
If you want to ensure that your formulas are consistent, make sure to enter them directly in the table column where you want the formula and avoid using the Tab key to create new rows.
2. Adjust Table Formulas:
Check the formulas in your table columns and adjust them manually if needed. If Excel is not extending the formulas correctly, you might need to correct the references manually.
3. Use Structured References:
If you're working with Excel tables, consider using structured references for your formulas. For example:
=IF([@ColumnD] - INDEX('Water Usage'!$D$1:$D$100, ROW() - 1) < 0, 0, [@ColumnD] - INDEX('Water Usage'!$D$1:$D$100, ROW() - 1))
This way, the formula will adapt automatically when you add a new row in the table.
4. Turn Off Formulas Auto-Extend:
If the issue persists, you can try turning off the feature that automatically extends formulas in tables:
Remember that turning off this feature might affect other aspects of your Excel experience, so use it carefully.
By using structured references and adjusting your table formulas, you can ensure that the formulas behave consistently when adding new rows. The text and steps were edited with the help of AI.
My answers are voluntary and without guarantee!
Hope this will help you.
Was the answer useful? Mark as best response and Like it!
This will help all forum participants.
Dec 01 2023 05:00 PM - edited Dec 01 2023 05:04 PM
@JAnderson910 I was unable to duplicate the described problem. Please clarify the following:
It's possible the formula in the calculated column just needs to be "refreshed". Select any cell in the column that contains the correct formula, press F2 on your keyboard (or click into the formula bar), then press Enter. If the "AutoCorrect Options" icon appears, click it and select "Overwrite all cells in this column with this formula".
Formula Tip:
=IF('Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28<0, 0, 'Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28)
...can be simplified using the MAX function:
=MAX('Water Usage'!D29-'Water Usage'!$D28, 0)
Dec 05 2023 09:22 AM
Dec 05 2023 09:39 AM
Using the tab key to start a new row for entry. Formula skips the new row.
Here I started a new row without using the tab by just entering data in the row below the table. here the formula stays consistent.
Dec 05 2023 11:19 AM
Solution@JAnderson910 The problem is definitely a result of the formula referencing cell D30, which is the next row located outside of the table. When a new table row is inserted by using the Tab key, the relative cell reference is affected in the same manner that inserting a new row in the middle of the table would result in inconsistent cell references. One way to solve this problem is to define a name in Name Manager using a relative row reference...
Start by selecting cell H29, for example. On the ribbon, go to Formulas > Define Name. Name it "NextMeterRead", then in the Refers To field, select cell D30, then press F4 on your keyboard twice to make it a relative row reference ($D30). It should look something like this:
Once defined, you can then update your calculated column formula as follows:
=IF(NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]]>-1, NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]], "")
Or, as mentioned in my previous reply, the MAX function could also do the trick:
=MAX(NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]], 0)
NextMeterRead will always refer to the row below the current row, in Column D, regardless of how you go about inserting a new row. Cheers!
Dec 05 2023 12:12 PM
Dec 05 2023 11:19 AM
Solution@JAnderson910 The problem is definitely a result of the formula referencing cell D30, which is the next row located outside of the table. When a new table row is inserted by using the Tab key, the relative cell reference is affected in the same manner that inserting a new row in the middle of the table would result in inconsistent cell references. One way to solve this problem is to define a name in Name Manager using a relative row reference...
Start by selecting cell H29, for example. On the ribbon, go to Formulas > Define Name. Name it "NextMeterRead", then in the Refers To field, select cell D30, then press F4 on your keyboard twice to make it a relative row reference ($D30). It should look something like this:
Once defined, you can then update your calculated column formula as follows:
=IF(NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]]>-1, NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]], "")
Or, as mentioned in my previous reply, the MAX function could also do the trick:
=MAX(NextMeterRead-[@[Sump Meter]], 0)
NextMeterRead will always refer to the row below the current row, in Column D, regardless of how you go about inserting a new row. Cheers!