Nov 02 2019 06:58 PM
I opened an old excel spreadsheet populated with many data entries that were originally in a decimal format with 1 decimal place e.g 4.5 but I found that they have all been converted to a d-mmm date format. i.e. 4-May I have tried many of the different number formats available, but can't get close to the original format. For instance Number format changes 4-May to 41763.00. Any ideas?
Nov 03 2019 01:18 AM
I'm on a Mac and when I choose to format a date I can select the region "Alsatian (France)". It will show the decimal format as one of the standard options. If you don't have these you might try a custom format "d.m;@". I've attached some screen shots that show you what I mean.
Nov 03 2019 04:39 PM
Nov 19 2021 12:58 AM
Hi, @Abiola1
I don't think @Tony_Curn had this in mind.
It's that somebody sends you an excel file, let's say with mater data. On original computer, the data is in decimal values.
I receive it via email. I open it on my computer. And certain decimal values are ''automatically'' changed to arbitrary dates. Now, if I format it back to numbers, the numbers are not the same anymore.
e.g: 1.5 ---> May first (or June 5th, depends on the will of excel at that time), and then convert back to number, you get something like 412381.
1.5 =! 412381
That's the problem here.
Nov 19 2021 01:50 AM
The process has some things in common with unscrambling eggs!
Once you identify that Excel has misread the data input, you can take steps to reverse the process. The day and month can be separated using
DAY(data)
MONTH(data)/10
and then treated as the integer and decimal parts of a number using the appropriate formula
= DAY(data)+MONTH(data)/10
or
= DAY(data)+MONTH(data)/10^LEN(MONTH(data))
the later dealing with months Oct-Dec.
Another solution that could work given computer settings other than those that messed up the data in the first place would be
=--TEXT(data,"d.m")
Nov 19 2021 05:21 AM - edited Nov 19 2021 05:22 AM
Thank you @Peter Bartholomew for your reply. This has actually worked. In some cases I needed to do some additional magic, but it would not have worked without your initial input.
Not to mention the burst of laughter brought on by your 'unscrambling eggs' comparison, which is the most precise way to describe this problem.
Thank you again!