What in the World Happened to my DNAME Resolution!!??
Published Sep 20 2018 06:43 AM 1,321 Views
Microsoft

First published on TechNet on Jun 05, 2017
Hello world; Brandon Wilson here, with a special thanks to Tony Gaston in our support wing, here to talk to you briefly about changes in DNAME resolution for Windows Server 2012 R2 that were introduced in KB3133954 . More specifically, if you look at the "Known issue" section of KB3133954, you will find that it states: "After you install this update, the DNAME resolution by Microsoft DNS Servers will be changed. Previously, you could query for the domain (type=ANY or type=A) example.com, and get back the host (A) record for the DNAME. After you install this update, that query fails. This change was made for compliancy with RFC 6672 ." So, let's dive into this a little bit more shall we?? Per the RFC, the DNAME applies only to objects within the domain, and not to the domain itself. The bottom of page 4, along with pages 5 and 6 in the RFC talk about this behavior more in detail, so I'll try not to get too wordy on that. First, let's look at the high-level RFC defined behavior, where if you query the DNAME directly, you get the DNAME response back (this is from RFC 6672 :( Here are some more specific examples to chew on; hopefully they help you see the new behavior:

Now that we have all of that covered, we may as well talk a bit about KB3133954 itself… The actual KB title is "DNSSEC validation fails when incorrect response to DNSKEY query is sent on Windows Server 2012 R2-based DNS server". The high-level overview is that this is to correct an issue where if a DNSKEY query is targeted for a name that has a DNAME, then it will respond back with the DNSKEY rather than the "correct"/expected target name. So, in correcting 1 issue, you are actually correcting both that issue, as well as refining your DNS servers to be RFC compliant. In the context of the behavior change however, DNSSEC is a separate topic altogether, and the KB is only an introduction point to the changes made for DNAME resolution.

And in a nutshell, that's pretty much it. I just wanted to let everyone know about the changes and provide a bit of an example to maybe, just maybe, eliminate some head scratching! Hey, we can all dream right…?

References:

DNSSEC validation fails when incorrect response to DNSKEY query is sent on Windows Server 2012 R2-based DNS server

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3133954/dnssec-validation-fails-when-incorrect-response-to...

RFC 6672: DNAME Redirection in the DNS

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6672

Thanks for reading everyone!

Brandon Wilson, Sr. Premier Field Engineer, Platforms and Active Directory

Version history
Last update:
‎Feb 20 2020 07:33 AM
Updated by: