Feb 14 2020 03:18 AM
Hi,
My understanding was that the preferred way to create and manage re-usable images was to use "Shared Image Gallery" which has features like multiple replicates, region replicas, versioning, and so on.
I have come across a scenario where a disk (image) is being used and I assume that it has been generalised.
Personally without going to deep into it I would say that the disk will have associated storage costs which will be persistent, however the Shared Image Gallery images will have a lower billing cost for images.
Has anyone come across similar scenarios and maybe the use of disks (as images) is an old way of operating or does it pose any benefit over the use of Shared Image Gallery images?
Mar 12 2020 04:16 PM