Why are there such widely vaying approaches to UI, Navigation, Security, Information Architecture, and Administration in the 3 new communities:
There are overlaps and gaps between these which makes it very confusing.
Just a few examples:
It would be very helpful if the MS community managers could devlop a master plan that clearly shows a decision tree about when to use each and a planned hierarchy of groups/forums/channels
Thanks for the feedback Dean. I agree, it's incredibly confusing how we differentiate internally. We'll work on getting something together to clearly explain each community and their purpose.