AppX Packages Issue with WVD Sessionhosts.

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1142454%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAppX%20Packages%20Issue%20with%20WVD%20Sessionhosts.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1142454%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Everyone%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20don't%20know%20who%20else%20experiences%20this%2C%20but%20whenever%20we%20have%20deployed%20a%20new%20set%20of%20hosts.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20default%20appx%20packages%20always%20appear%20like%20msresource%3Aname%20or%20msresource%3Aappfriendlyname%20for%20example.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EToday%20however%2C%20for%20me%20personally%20I%20don't%20have%20this%20issue%20but%20other%20users%20in%20the%20environment%20do.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIs%20this%20a%20known%20issue%3F%20Or%20can%20someone%20advise%20a%20fix%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Occasional Contributor

Hi Everyone,

I don't know who else experiences this, but whenever we have deployed a new set of hosts.

 

The default appx packages always appear like msresource:name or msresource:appfriendlyname for example.

 

Today however, for me personally I don't have this issue but other users in the environment do.

 

Is this a known issue? Or can someone advise a fix?

0 Replies