Alert Handing

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-987903%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAlert%20Handing%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-987903%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Esince%20we%20have%20connected%20Azure%20Security%20Center%2C%20Office%20Security%20Center%20and%20Cloud%20app%20Security%20%2C%20we%20now%20have%20to%20close%20alerts%20in%20multiple%20places.%20How%20are%20you%20handing%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-991287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Alert%20Handing%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-991287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F324992%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40capsec_1101%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFollowing..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EExperts%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUse%20Case%20in%20MCAS%3A%20An%20alert%20is%20triggered%20based%20on%20the%20policy%26nbsp%3B%3CSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3Bwhich%20needs%20user%20intervention%20to%20confirm%20the%20same.%20There%20is%20a%20flow%20that%20triggers%20an%20alert%20to%20the%20user%2C%20and%20user%20responds%20to%20it%20accordingly%20and%20SNOW%20ticket%20is%20generated%20and%20based%20on%20user%20response%20the%20alert%20is%20dismissed%2F%20resolved%20in%20MCAS.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FEnterprise-Mobility-Security%2FAutomating-Security-workflows-with-Microsoft-s-CASB-and-MS-Flow%2Fba-p%2F308575%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FEnterprise-Mobility-Security%2FAutomating-Security-workflows-with-Microsoft-s-CASB-and-MS-Flow%2Fba-p%2F308575%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHow%20do%20we%20achieve%20the%20same%20in%20Sentinel%3F%20Would%20it%20be%20possible%20to%20create%20the%20same%20flow%20on%20Sentinel%20instead%20of%20MCAS%20using%20Logic%20Apps%20which%20would%20take%20up%20the%20compromised%20entity%20and%20trigger%20a%20mail%20for%20user%20response(Cloud%20App%20Security%20connector%20seems%20to%20be%20missing%20or%20did%20I%20not%20search%20it%20thoroughly)%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Highlighted
Senior Member

since we have connected Azure Security Center, Office Security Center and Cloud app Security , we now have to close alerts in multiple places. How are you handing this?

1 Reply
Highlighted

@capsec_1101 

 

Following..

Experts,

 

Use Case in MCAS: An alert is triggered based on the policy  which needs user intervention to confirm the same. There is a flow that triggers an alert to the user, and user responds to it accordingly and SNOW ticket is generated and based on user response the alert is dismissed/ resolved in MCAS.

 

https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Enterprise-Mobility-Security/Automating-Security-workflows-wi...

 

How do we achieve the same in Sentinel? Would it be possible to create the same flow on Sentinel instead of MCAS using Logic Apps which would take up the compromised entity and trigger a mail for user response(Cloud App Security connector seems to be missing or did I not search it thoroughly)?

 

Thanks