Hi, it's Adam Conkle again. Today I’d like to talk about an ADFS case I had recently where the customer ran into some limitations with their Federated WebSSO with Forest Trust setup. They had their environment set up similar to what is described in the TechNet design article :
As you can see, they implemented a one-way forest trust between their internal network and the DMZ where the DMZ AD trusts the internal AD. Their ADFS-enabled application was not claims-aware . It was an NT token-based application , so it needed to be protected with the NT token-based Web Agent . The application also did Kerberos delegation to a backend SQL server (not shown). They had user accounts in both the internal AD and the DMZ AD which needed access to this application.
The forest trust is utilized by ADFS only when both the Account Partner (their internal AD) and Resource Partner (their DMZ AD) ADFS consoles are configured as follows:
-On the Account Partner:
-On the Resource Partner:
When ADFS is utilizing the forest trust and a user from the internal AD accesses the application, the user SID from the Account Partner AD is now available on the Resource Partner side where the NT token is built. The NT token-based Web Agent builds an NT token local on the web server. Once the NT token is built and used to access the application, ADFS authentication is complete. Next, their application needs to access SQL, so we must transition to Kerberos to do delegation to the backend SQL service.
Whenever we need to do Kerberos delegation with Federated WebSSO with Forest Trust it must be configured for Kerberos Protocol Transition and Constrained Delegation . If you have read documentation on Kerberos Constrained Delegation, you will remember that cross-forest authentication requires a two-way forest trust. Having ADFS authentication in the picture does not negate the two-way forest trust requirement.
During this process of delegation, a S4U2SELF ticket is requested and we also need to be able to get a TGT for the Account Partner domain. Without a two-way trust in place, this TGT request will fail with S_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN.
Rather than use the Federated WebSSO with Forest Trust , you have two other options:
Option 1: Create resource accounts in the Resource Partner forest
Disadvantage of using this option: High administrative overhead of managing the resource accounts.
Option 2: Create a group-to-UPN mapping for the Account Partner users
Disadvantage of using this option: The identity of individual users is lost. All users from the Account Partner are authenticated to the application with the UPN of the single resource account.
For more information about resource account mapping methods, check out this TechNet Article:
To conclude, the Federated WebSSO with Forest Trust scenario will work just fine with a one-way forest trust when there is no Kerberos delegation involved. As soon as you need to delegate Kerberos with your ADFS-enabled application and you are using Federated WebSSO with Forest Trust, you must be using the NT Token-based Web Agent and you must have a two-way forest trust in place. If a two-way trust will not work for your environment, consider the alternative options described above.
Adam “I wish I had cooler t-shirts” Conkle
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.