- Home
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
- AI - Machine Learning Blog
- Differences between Pre-Training and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
When we talk about the differences between Pre-Training and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), the goals, datasets used, and number of GPUs required are all different. However, if we are to explain the difference from the essence of deep learning training, it is:
Pre-training involves randomly initializing model parameters, constructing the model, and then training it on a large amount of unlabeled data to learn general features of the corpus; whereas fine-tuning loads parameters from the pre-trained model, retains the general features learned during pre-training, and trains the model on a small amount of high-quality labeled data to enhance the model's capability and performance on specific tasks.
The parameters mentioned above include: weights, biases, Word Embeddings, Positional Encoding, attention mechanism parameters, etc.
More detail explanations
Pre-Training aims to learn the fundamental structure and semantic features of a language using large-scale unsupervised datasets (such as text corpora). Pre-training typically involves the following steps:
- Random Initialization of Weights: The model's parameters, such as weights and biases, are randomly initialized at the start of pre-training.
- Large-Scale Dataset: Training is conducted using a vast amount of unsupervised data.
- Learning General Features: The model learns the general features of the language by optimizing a loss function (e.g., the cross-entropy loss of a language model).
Key Points of Pre-Training
- Random Initialization: All model parameters (weights, biases, etc.) are random at the beginning of pre-training.
- Large-Scale Data: Training is done using a large-scale unsupervised dataset.
- General Features: The model learns the basic structure and semantic features of the language, providing a good starting point for subsequent tasks.
Fine-Tuning aims to optimize the model's performance on a specific task using a task-specific dataset. Fine-tuning typically involves the following steps:
- Loading Pre-Trained Weights: The model's weights and biases are loaded from the pre-trained model.
- Task-Specific Data: Training is conducted using a dataset specific to the task.
- Optimizing Task Performance: The model adjusts its parameters by optimizing a loss function to improve performance on the specific task.
Key Points of Fine-Tuning
- Loading Pre-Trained Weights: The model's parameters are loaded from the pre-trained model, retaining the general features learned during pre-training.
- Task-Specific Data: Training is done using a dataset specific to the task.
- Task Optimization: The model's parameters are further adjusted to optimize performance on the specific task.
Summary
- Training Efficiency: Pre-training usually requires substantial computational resources and time because it involves training all model parameters on a large-scale dataset. Fine-tuning is relatively efficient as it builds on the pre-trained model and only requires further optimization on task-specific data.
- Model Performance: The pre-trained model has already learned general language features, allowing fine-tuning to converge faster and perform better on specific tasks. Training a task-specific model from random initialization typically requires more data and time, and its performance may not match that of the pre-training + fine-tuning approach.
- Application Scenarios: Pre-trained models can serve as general-purpose base models suitable for various downstream tasks. Fine-tuning allows for quick adaptation to different task requirements without the need to train a model from scratch.
Pre-training Code Demonstration
Taking GPT-2 as an Example
https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/v4.44.0/en/model_doc/gpt2#transformers.GPT2LMHeadModel
To pre-train GPT-2, we need to use the classes GPT2LMHeadModel and GPT2Config:
config = GPT2Config()
model = GPT2LMHeadModel(config)
tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
dataset = load_dataset("wikitext", "wikitext-2-raw-v1")
def tokenize_function(examples):
return tokenizer(examples["text"], truncation=True, padding="max_length", max_length=512, return_special_tokens_mask=True)
tokenized_datasets = dataset.map(tokenize_function, batched=True, remove_columns=["text"])
print("Train dataset size:", len(tokenized_datasets["train"]))
print("Validation dataset size:", len(tokenized_datasets["validation"]))
data_collator = DataCollatorForLanguageModeling(tokenizer=tokenizer, mlm=False)
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./results",
overwrite_output_dir=True,
num_train_epochs=5,
per_device_train_batch_size=64,
save_steps=10_000,
save_total_limit=2,
remove_unused_columns=False,
report_to=[],
learning_rate=5e-4
)
trainer = Trainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
data_collator=data_collator,
train_dataset=tokenized_datasets["train"],
eval_dataset=tokenized_datasets["validation"]
)
if torch.cuda.is_available():
model.cuda()
trainer.train()
Since the model is small, pre-training can be done with a single H100 GPU.
Training result is as following:
| Step | Training Loss |
|---|---|
| 500 | 6.505700 |
| 1000 | 5.657100 |
| 1500 | 5.269900 |
| 2000 | 4.972000 |
| 2500 | 4.725000 |
The trained model can be used for inference validation.
model = GPT2LMHeadModel.from_pretrained("./results/checkpoint-2870")
tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
model.to(device)
model.eval()
input_text = "Once upon a time"
inputs = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt", padding=True).to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model.generate(
inputs.input_ids,
attention_mask=inputs.attention_mask,
max_length=100,
num_return_sequences=1,
no_repeat_ngram_size=2,
early_stopping=True,
temperature=0.7,
top_p=0.9,
do_sample=True,
pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id
)
generated_text = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(generated_text)
Inference result is as following:
Once upon a time of the earthquake, the local community of local and a new new government, a military government who had begun with the " the most prominent ".
Fine-tuning Code Demonstration
When we fine-tune a model, it usually refers to Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT). SFT can be divided into Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) and Full Fine Tuning.In PEFT implementations, methods like LoRA, QLoRA, and GA-LoRA are quite popular.
Let's first look at how to load a model for Full Fine Tuning. We use the AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained class, which retrieves the parameters of the pre-trained model.
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_name, attn_implementation=attn_implementation, device_map={"": 0}
)
model.gradient_checkpointing_enable(gradient_checkpointing_kwargs={'use_reentrant':True})
For the complete Full fine tuning code, refer to the repository:
https://github.com/davidsajare/david-share/tree/master/Deep-Learning/SmolLM-Full-Fine-Tuning
Next, let's look at the differences in code implementation for fine-tuning, LoRA, and QLoRA. In terms of loading models and training parameters, Full Fine-Tuning, LoRA, and QLoRA have the following differences:
Difference in Loading Models
- Full Fine-Tuning
- Directly load the complete model for training.
- Use AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained to load the model.
- LoRA
- Load the model and then use LoRA configuration for parameter-efficient fine-tuning.
- Use LoraConfig from the peft library to configure LoRA parameters.
- Target modules are usually specific projection layers, such as k_proj, q_proj, etc.
- QLoRA
- Based on LoRA, it combines quantization techniques (e.g., 4-bit quantization) to reduce memory usage.
- Use BitsAndBytesConfig for quantization configuration.
- Call prepare_model_for_kbit_training to prepare the model.
Difference in Training Parameters
- Full Fine-Tuning
- Train all model parameters.
- Typically requires more memory and computational resources.
- Use standard optimizers like adamw_torch.
- LoRA
- Only train the low-rank matrices inserted by LoRA, keeping other parameters unchanged.
- Faster training speed and less memory usage.
- Use optimizers like paged_adamw_8bit.
- QLoRA
- Combine LoRA and quantization techniques to further reduce memory usage.
- Suitable for fine-tuning large models in resource-constrained environments.
- Also use the paged_adamw_8bit optimizer.
It should be noted that when performing LoRA or QLoRA fine-tuning, we can specify the modules to be trained, such as:
model = FastLanguageModel.get_peft_model(
model,
r = 128,
target_modules = ["q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj",
"gate_proj", "up_proj", "down_proj",
"embed_tokens", "lm_head",], # Add for continual pretraining
lora_alpha = 32,
lora_dropout = 0, # Supports any, but = 0 is optimized
bias = "none", # Supports any, but = "none" is optimized
use_gradient_checkpointing = "unsloth", # True or "unsloth" for very long context
random_state = 3407,
use_rslora = True,
)
For detailed information, refer to：
https://github.com/davidsajare/david-share/tree/master/Deep-Learning/Continue-Pre-training
Distributed Implementation of Training
There is no doubt that pre-training large language models requires multi-node and multi-GPU setups. This necessitates distributed training. Currently, the underlying distributed pre-training can be implemented by calling NCCL. Higher-level tools such as Megatron, DeepSpeed, and HF's accelerate library (which currently supports FSDP) can be used. These tools effectively implement DP/PP/TP.
Megatron-DeepSpeed
For detailed information on pre-training using Megatron combined with DeepSpeed, refer to:
DeepSpeed
For an example of SFT implementation using DeepSpeed, refer to:
Axolotl
Currently, some open-source fine-tuning tools like Axolotl can also directly interface with DeepSpeed. For an example, refer to:
https://github.com/davidsajare/david-share/tree/master/Deep-Learning/Fine-tuning-with-Axolotl
Accelerate
When using FSDP with accelerate, other parallel strategies can be combined to achieve more efficient training.
- Data Parallelism (DP)
- FSDP itself is a data parallel strategy, achieved by sharding model parameters.
- Pipeline Parallelism (PP)
- The model can be divided into multiple stages, with each stage running on different devices. This requires manual partitioning of the model and managing the data flow.
- Tensor Parallelism (TP)
- The computation of a single layer is distributed across multiple devices. This requires modifications to the model's computation graph.
Combining these strategies usually requires significant customization and adjustments to the model and training scripts. accelerate provides some tools to simplify these processes, but specific implementations may require combining other PyTorch libraries (such as torch.distributed) and custom code.
For an example of FSDP with accelerate, refer to:
https://github.com/davidsajare/david-share/tree/master/Deep-Learning/Llama-3.1-70B-FSDP-Fine-Tuning
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.