SOLVED
Home

General Use File server on Failover Cluster deployed in Azure on Windows server 2016

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-65733%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EGeneral%20Use%20File%20server%20on%20Failover%20Cluster%20deployed%20in%20Azure%20on%20Windows%20server%202016%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-65733%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20trying%20to%20get%20a%20clear%20answer%20on%20Failover%20clustering%20in%20WIndows%20Server%202016.%20%26nbsp%3BIn%20Windows%202012%20setting%20up%20a%20Scale%20Out%20File%20Server%20share%20was%20to%20be%20used%20for%20SQL%20or%20Hyper-V.%20%26nbsp%3BUsing%20the%26nbsp%3BGeneral%20Use%20File%20server%20was%20for%20file%20shares.%20%26nbsp%3BI%20would%20like%20to%20know%20if%20this%20guidance%20is%20still%20true%20for%20WIndows%202016%3F%20%26nbsp%3BON%20this%20blog%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-ca%2Fwindows-server%2Fremote%2Fremote-desktop-services%2Frds-storage-spaces-direct-deployment%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-ca%2Fwindows-server%2Fremote%2Fremote-desktop-services%2Frds-storage-spaces-direct-deployment%3C%2FA%3E%20%26nbsp%3BMicrosoft%20is%20recommending%20a%20SOFS%20for%20user%20profile%20disks.%20%26nbsp%3BDoesn't%20that%20go%20agains%20the%20guidance%20Microsoft%20recommends%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20the%20end%20I%20want%20to%20build%20a%20HA%20file%20share%20to%20store%20citrix%20user%20profiles%20in%20Azure.%20%26nbsp%3BI%20am%20not%20sure%20what%20to%20use%20to%20accomplish%20it%20in%20Azure%2C%20a%20SOFS%20or%20a%20gerneral%20use%20file%20share%3F%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-87251%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20General%20Use%20File%20server%20on%20Failover%20Cluster%20deployed%20in%20Azure%20on%20Windows%20server%202016%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-87251%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%20Bradley%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat%20is%20%3CEM%3Eexactly%3C%2FEM%3E%20what%20I%20am%20trying%20to%20do.%20The%20SOFS%20was%20easy%20to%20setup%2C%20but%20not%20ideal%20for%20Citrix%20Profiles%20as%20it%20stores%20them%20in%20indivdual%20files%20(unlike%20RDS%2C%20which%20is%20VHD%20and%20would%20work).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20tried%20setting%20up%20a%20general%20file%20server%20in%20the%20failover%20cluster%2C%20but%20I%20can%20only%20get%20it%20to%20reply%20when%20it%20is%20on%20one%20of%20the%20two%20nodes.%20It%20must%20have%20something%20to%20do%20with%20the%20load%20balancer%2C%20but%20I%20have%20not%20worked%20it%20out%20yet.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDid%20you%20come%20up%20with%20a%20solution%20for%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-80983%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20General%20Use%20File%20server%20on%20Failover%20Cluster%20deployed%20in%20Azure%20on%20Windows%20server%202016%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-80983%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt%20is%20still%20true.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESOFS%20in%20S2D%20(Storage%20Spaces%20Direct)%20or%20in%20a%20disaggregated%20setting%20(2%2B%20nodes%20%2B%20JBOD(s))%20is%20meant%20for%20storaging%20VHDX%20files%20that%20are%20used%20in%20a%20Hyper-V%20compute%20cluster.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EA%20simple%20cluster%20setup%20that%20can%20host%20a%20Highly%20Available%20file%20server%20VM%20would%20be%20an%20asymmetric%20cluster%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CUL%3E%3CLI%3E(2)%20Nodes%20with%20(2)%20SAS%20HBAs%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3E(1)%20JBOD%20or%20more%20if%20needed%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FUL%3E%3CP%3EThe%20above%20setup%20would%20host%20both%20clustered%20Storage%20Spaces%20and%20Hyper-V.%20%3CA%20title%3D%222%20Node%20Asymmetric%20Cluster%22%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fblog.mpecsinc.ca%2F2015%2F09%2Fa-2-node-hyper-v-cluster-with-clustered.html%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3EAn%20example%20on%20our%20company%20blog%3C%2FA%3E.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Bradley Weir
Contributor

I am trying to get a clear answer on Failover clustering in WIndows Server 2016.  In Windows 2012 setting up a Scale Out File Server share was to be used for SQL or Hyper-V.  Using the General Use File server was for file shares.  I would like to know if this guidance is still true for WIndows 2016?  ON this blog https://docs.microsoft.com/en-ca/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/rds-storage-spaces-di...  Microsoft is recommending a SOFS for user profile disks.  Doesn't that go agains the guidance Microsoft recommends?

 

In the end I want to build a HA file share to store citrix user profiles in Azure.  I am not sure what to use to accomplish it in Azure, a SOFS or a gerneral use file share?  

2 Replies
Solution

It is still true.

 

SOFS in S2D (Storage Spaces Direct) or in a disaggregated setting (2+ nodes + JBOD(s)) is meant for storaging VHDX files that are used in a Hyper-V compute cluster.

 

A simple cluster setup that can host a Highly Available file server VM would be an asymmetric cluster:

  • (2) Nodes with (2) SAS HBAs
  • (1) JBOD or more if needed

The above setup would host both clustered Storage Spaces and Hyper-V. An example on our company blog.

Hey Bradley,

 

That is exactly what I am trying to do. The SOFS was easy to setup, but not ideal for Citrix Profiles as it stores them in indivdual files (unlike RDS, which is VHD and would work).

 

I tried setting up a general file server in the failover cluster, but I can only get it to reply when it is on one of the two nodes. It must have something to do with the load balancer, but I have not worked it out yet.

 

Did you come up with a solution for this?

Related Conversations
Extentions Synchronization
Deleted in Discussions on
3 Replies
Tabs and Dark Mode
cjc2112 in Discussions on
36 Replies
flashing a white screen while open new tab
Deleted in Discussions on
14 Replies
Stable version of Edge insider browser
HotCakeX in Discussions on
35 Replies