04-02-2019 02:15 PM
04-11-2019 08:36 AM
I'm not sure if this is now a resolved issue but I would love to see any meeting invitation response listed in tracking. I often have meetings where people accept, decline, or indicate tentative without sending a response. When that happens, and the tracking does not get updated and I look at that tracking information, I have no idea as to the intentions of attendees that I may consider to be key contributors..
Regarding question 2, If the organizer does not request a response to a meeting invitation then I would assume that they do not want to deal with the emails associated wit the responses but they may still want to be able to track who and how many invitees accept.
04-19-2019 10:43 AM
Yes, please make this change. If I accept a meeting without sending an annoying email bothering the orgranizer that I will come, then I have still accepted the meeting and it should be recorded that I've accepted the meeting. The current way is counter-intuitive to the way people think.
05-01-2019 07:48 AM
We do plan to make this change in Outlook 2016 for Windows, but do not have an ETA yet. When responding from Windows, you'll need to send a response to update the organizer's tracking.
As mentioned previously, the new behavior (update organizer but do not send an email) is released for all other clients.
05-01-2019 10:51 AM
Hi @Julia Foran
What does it mean "When responding from Windows"?
I'm running Office 365 Pro Plus
"We do plan to make this change in Outlook 2016 for Windows, but do not have an ETA yet. When responding from Windows, you'll need to send a response to update the organizer's tracking.
As mentioned previously, the new behavior (update organizer but do not send an email) is released for all other clients."
05-01-2019 01:37 PM - edited 05-01-2019 02:01 PM
Yes to both. When should we expect this to be implemented?
05-13-2019 02:42 PM
Yes please to both!
2. Most people I have worked with believe accepting + don't send response updates the tracking of the meeting without spamming the organizer's inbox. It sounds like nothing but good.
Is there a timeline for a decision either way?
05-15-2019 09:07 AM
1) YES - I had the same expectation - that the organizer would still be able to track my response but would not have their inbox cluttered unnecessarily. This change should definitely be implemented.
2) YES - if accept is only option (organizer has not requested responses), organizer should not receive emails for each response, but Outlook should definitely update the tracking information.
Perhaps to satisfy those who did not expect this behavior, or wish to remain anonymous, a 4th option could be added, for responding just for oneself, and sending no tracking information at all to the organizer.
06-26-2019 07:53 AM
I would love to have the tracking feature added to the "Do Not Send A Response" feature so that accepting the meeting saves on the number of emails to the organizer and so that the organize receives an accurate count of attendees for each meeting.
Yes and yes. The 'Do Not Send A Response' function puts the Organizer at a disadvantage by not recording the acceptance in the meeting tracker. And, I believe that the people who use this response option believe that the Organizer will be able to view their Meeting Acceptance (and that they are saving the Organizer a redundant email in their inbox). Right now it is more of an "Incognito" Accept option, which is not clear to the user.