Home

Teams Performance

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-898206%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETeams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-898206%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWill%20anyone%20from%20the%20Teams%20product%20group%20offer%20an%20update%20on%20performance%20of%20the%20windows%20app%3F%26nbsp%3B%20It%20seems%20like%20the%20majority%20of%20comments%20today%20are%20around%20CPU%20usage%2C%20memory%20usage%2C%20latency%20for%20chat%20history%2C%20etc%2C%20but%20nobody%20seems%20to%20be%20willing%20to%20offer%20a%20meaningful%20comment%20around%20it.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFor%20two%20years%2C%20all%20we've%20heard%20is%20that%20the%20group%20is%20looking%20into%20improving%20performance.%26nbsp%3B%20Does%20that%20mean%20a%20new%20app%20is%20coming%20out%20soon%20NOT%20built%20on%20the%20'super%20efficient'%20Electron%20rails%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-898206%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPerformance%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-898537%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-898537%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20guess%20we%20will%20have%20some%20updates%20around%20Ignite%2C%20but%20for%20now%20not%20specific%20news%20on%20Teams%20Client%20performance%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-901121%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-901121%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETeams%20has%20been%20improving%20over%20time.%20If%20you%20compare%20Teams%20client%20today%2C%20vs.%20Teams%20client%20last%20year%2C%20there%20is%20a%20massive%20difference%20in%20performance.%20There%20def.%20is%20more%20work%20that%20could%20be%20done%2C%20but%20I%20have%20definitely%20noticed%20changes%20being%20introduced%20over%20time.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-901145%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-901145%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20agree%2C%20Teams%20is%20using%20less%20resources%20now%20than%20a%20year%20ago.%20But%20there%20is%20still%20room%20for%20improvements.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28313%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dustin%20Halvorson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20guess%20you%20have%20seen%20the%20uservoice%20about%20this%20and%20Microsoft%20answered%20there%20that%20they%20have%20improved%20performance%20for%20the%20Teams%20client%20and%20they%20are%20still%20working%20on%20improvements.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F17219609-teams-uses-600mb-and-is-super-slow%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F17219609-teams-uses-600mb-and-is-super-slow%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-901314%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-901314%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20it%20though...%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20897px%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgxcuf89792.i.lithium.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F136026i39C8903C13CE20ED%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3D1.0%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20alt%3D%22TeamsRAM.png%22%20title%3D%22TeamsRAM.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThat's%20just%20the%20client%20sitting%20idly%20in%20the%20tray%2C%20within%20our%20company%20tenant%20with%20just%2010%20teams%20or%20so%20I've%20joined...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-902423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-902423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F28313%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dustin%20Halvorson%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bthere%20are%20no%20plans%20that%20I've%20heard%20of%20for%20any%20new%20app%20not%20built%20on%20Electron.%20There%20have%20been%20significant%20enhancements%20to%20Teams%20that%20make%20it%20faster%20for%20things%20like%20starting%20chats%2C%20navigating%20etc.%20There%20are%20still%20a%20few%20areas%20of%20this%20to%20come%20e.g.%20faster%20tenant%20switching.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EFundamentally%20Teams%20client%20will%20continue%20to%20operate%20like%20a%20browser%2C%20with%20a%20memory%20footprint%20like%20a%20browser.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-902676%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-902676%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESure%2C%20try%20telling%20this%20to%20anyone%20running%20Teams%20on%20a%20laptop%2Fnetbook%20with%204GB%20RAM%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-903309%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-903309%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20mean%20I%20guess%20technically%20in%20that%20case%20if%20you%20run%20out%20of%20memory%2C%20then%20Memory%20usage%20%3D%20performance%20lol%20%3A).%20I%20remember%20it%20used%20to%20use%20like%201.2GB%20or%20something%20crazy%2C%20I%20don't%20usually%20see%20it%20going%20much%20over%20750MB%20these%20days%2C%20it%20def.%20can%20still%20use%20some%20tweaking%20which%20I'm%20sure%20will%20continue%20to%20improve%20over%20time.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-916308%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-916308%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F869%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Chris%20Webb%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BYet%20the%20minimum%20requirements%20still%20say%202GB!%26nbsp%3B%20That's%20unrealistic.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20an%20organization%20that%20wants%20to%20move%20to%20Teams%20that%20has%20spinning%20disks%2C%20and%204GB%20of%20RAM%20in%20desktops%2C%20it's%20a%20product%20that%20is%20impossible%20to%20support.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20frustrating%20to%20see%20the%20team%20continuing%20to%20post%20on%20things%20like%20integrations%20with%20third%20parties%2C%20when%20the%20core%20of%20the%20product%20is%20still%20extremely%20inefficient%2C%20and%20there%20doesn't%20look%20to%20be%20any%20priority%20put%20towards%20it.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-916402%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-916402%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ETo%20be%20fair%2C%20I%20have%20never%20seen%20Teams%20Desktop%20client%20using%201%20GB%20neither%202%20GB%20ofr%20RAM%20memory%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-916442%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Teams%20Performance%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-916442%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20not%20just%20Teams%20running%20on%20that%20device%20though.%20And%20I've%20seen%20it%20very%20close%20to%201GB.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Dustin Halvorson
Contributor

Will anyone from the Teams product group offer an update on performance of the windows app?  It seems like the majority of comments today are around CPU usage, memory usage, latency for chat history, etc, but nobody seems to be willing to offer a meaningful comment around it.

 

For two years, all we've heard is that the group is looking into improving performance.  Does that mean a new app is coming out soon NOT built on the 'super efficient' Electron rails?

12 Replies
I guess we will have some updates around Ignite, but for now not specific news on Teams Client performance
Teams has been improving over time. If you compare Teams client today, vs. Teams client last year, there is a massive difference in performance. There def. is more work that could be done, but I have definitely noticed changes being introduced over time.

I agree, Teams is using less resources now than a year ago. But there is still room for improvements.

 

@Dustin Halvorson I guess you have seen the uservoice about this and Microsoft answered there that they have improved performance for the Teams client and they are still working on improvements.

https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/17219609-teams-uses-600mb-and-...

Is it though...

 

TeamsRAM.png

That's just the client sitting idly in the tray, within our company tenant with just 10 teams or so I've joined...

Memory usage != performance
;)

@Dustin Halvorson there are no plans that I've heard of for any new app not built on Electron. There have been significant enhancements to Teams that make it faster for things like starting chats, navigating etc. There are still a few areas of this to come e.g. faster tenant switching.

 

Fundamentally Teams client will continue to operate like a browser, with a memory footprint like a browser.

Sure, try telling this to anyone running Teams on a laptop/netbook with 4GB RAM :)

I mean I guess technically in that case if you run out of memory, then Memory usage = performance lol :). I remember it used to use like 1.2GB or something crazy, I don't usually see it going much over 750MB these days, it def. can still use some tweaking which I'm sure will continue to improve over time.

@Chris Webb Yet the minimum requirements still say 2GB!  That's unrealistic.

 

In an organization that wants to move to Teams that has spinning disks, and 4GB of RAM in desktops, it's a product that is impossible to support.

 

It's frustrating to see the team continuing to post on things like integrations with third parties, when the core of the product is still extremely inefficient, and there doesn't look to be any priority put towards it.

To be fair, I have never seen Teams Desktop client using 1 GB neither 2 GB ofr RAM memory

It's not just Teams running on that device though. And I've seen it very close to 1GB.

If there are no plans to move away from electron then the uservoice ticket should be closed as "working as intended" so people don't hold out hope for improvements.  If you aren't intending to fix performance then maybe focus on adding/improving teams functionality available via API so 3rd party clients can take over some of this performance work.  

Related Conversations
Tabs and Dark Mode
cjc2112 in Discussions on
46 Replies
Extentions Synchronization
Deleted in Discussions on
3 Replies
Stable version of Edge insider browser
HotCakeX in Discussions on
35 Replies
flashing a white screen while open new tab
Deleted in Discussions on
14 Replies
How to Prevent Teams from Auto-Launch
chenrylee in Microsoft Teams on
29 Replies
Security Community Webinars
Valon_Kolica in Security, Privacy & Compliance on
13 Replies