Home

Public with read only role

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-371688%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPublic%20with%20read%20only%20role%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-371688%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20there%20a%20way%20to%20create%20a%20%22public%22%20user%26nbsp%3Bin%20a%20private%20group%20to%20have%26nbsp%3Bread%20access%20to%20everything%3F%26nbsp%3B%20We%20would%20like%20the%20entire%20company%20to%20have%20visibility%20to%20what%20is%20in%20Teams%2C%20but%20only%20with%20ReadOnly%20permissions.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-371688%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-375800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Public%20with%20read%20only%20role%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-375800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F301820%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40JOGrady%3C%2FA%3E%20for%20now%20use%20a%20Public%20Team%2C%20limit%20so%20only%20Owners%20can%20post%20to%20general%2C%20add%20channels%20etc.%20Then%20what's%20left%20for%20members%20is%20a%20read%20only%20channel.%20I%20covered%20some%20of%20this%20in%20my%20blog%20-%26gt%3B%26nbsp%3B%3CFONT%20style%3D%22background-color%3A%20%23ffffff%3B%22%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fregarding365.com%2F5-rules-for-all-company-or-very-large-microsoft-teams-d74153d90c88%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fregarding365.com%2F5-rules-for-all-company-or-very-large-microsoft-teams-d74153d90c88%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-375763%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Public%20with%20read%20only%20role%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-375763%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F301820%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40JOGrady%3C%2FA%3E%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThere%20is%20a%20uservoice%20for%20Read-only%20access%20on%20Teams%20here%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F36321109-i-would-like-to-create-a-read-only-team%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F36321109-i-would-like-to-create-a-read-only-team%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20would%20recommend%20you%20vote%20for%20this%20to%20push%20it%20up%20the%20agenda.%20I%20think%20it%E2%80%99s%20a%20pretty%20important%20feature%20for%20transparency%20and%20functionality%20purposes.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAs%20Chris%20said%20previously%20you%20can%20try%20workarounds%20but%20ultimately%2C%20what%20you%20need%20isn%E2%80%99t%20there%20yet%20-%20but%20ought%20to%20be.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EHope%20that%20answers%20your%20question%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EBest%2C%20Chris%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-372244%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Public%20with%20read%20only%20role%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-372244%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EOnly%20with%20a%20team%20and%20a%20single%20general%20channel%20since%20you%20can%20lock%20that%20channel%20down%20from%20posts%20but%20it%20would%20lock%20for%20everyone%20there%20is%20currently%20no%20way%20to%20lock%20read%20only%20to%20a%20subset%20of%20Teams%20users%20for%20conversations.%20Files%20you%20might%20be%20able%20to%20rig%20up%20something%20but%20I%E2%80%99m%20going%20to%20assume%20you%20mean%20conversations.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
JOGrady
Occasional Visitor

Is there a way to create a "public" user in a private group to have read access to everything?  We would like the entire company to have visibility to what is in Teams, but only with ReadOnly permissions.

3 Replies
Only with a team and a single general channel since you can lock that channel down from posts but it would lock for everyone there is currently no way to lock read only to a subset of Teams users for conversations. Files you might be able to rig up something but I’m going to assume you mean conversations.
Hi @JOGrady,

There is a uservoice for Read-only access on Teams here

https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/36321109-i-would-like-to-creat...

I would recommend you vote for this to push it up the agenda. I think it’s a pretty important feature for transparency and functionality purposes.

As Chris said previously you can try workarounds but ultimately, what you need isn’t there yet - but ought to be.

Hope that answers your question

Best, Chris

@JOGrady for now use a Public Team, limit so only Owners can post to general, add channels etc. Then what's left for members is a read only channel. I covered some of this in my blog -> https://regarding365.com/5-rules-for-all-company-or-very-large-microsoft-teams-d74153d90c88

Related Conversations
flashing a white screen while open new tab
cntvertex in Discussions on
13 Replies
Tabs and Dark Mode
cjc2112 in Discussions on
22 Replies
Stable version of Edge insider browser
HotCakeX in Discussions on
35 Replies
How to Prevent Teams from Auto-Launch
chenrylee in Microsoft Teams on
28 Replies
PacketMon Components are not loading in WAC 1909
HotCakeX in Windows Admin Center on
2 Replies