SOLVED
Home

Manage policies / coexistence mode by AD groups

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-459475%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EManage%20policies%20%2F%20coexistence%20mode%20by%20AD%20groups%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-459475%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eis%20there%20any%20option%20how%20to%20assign%20policies%20and%20coexistence%20mode%20to%20AD%20groups%20or%20members%20in%20group%3F%20We%20would%20like%20to%20manage%20coexistence%20mode%20(TeamsOnly)%20based%20on%20AD%20group%20but%20I%20have%20not%20found%20yet%20any%20option.%20I%20have%20found%20just%20powershell%20script%20(%3CSPAN%3EGrant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy)%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20to%20assign%20to%20concrete%20user%20but%20not%20to%20AD%20group.%20Thank%20you%20for%20tips.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMirek%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-459475%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-459529%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Manage%20policies%20%2F%20coexistence%20mode%20by%20AD%20groups%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-459529%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAfaik%20No..%20Its%20per%20user%20or%20tenant!%20But%20I%20guess%20you%20could%20have%20a%20script%20parse%20the%20members%20of%20a%20group%20with%20%3CSPAN%3EGet-ADGroupMember%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20and%20do%20a%20for%20each%20loop%20setting%20the%20coexistance%20on%20each%20user%20in%20that%20group%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CFONT%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fpowershell%2Fmodule%2Fskype%2Fgrant-csteamsupgradepolicy%3Fview%3Dskype-ps%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fpowershell%2Fmodule%2Fskype%2Fgrant-csteamsupgradepolicy%3Fview%3Dskype-ps%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FFONT%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5245%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Miroslav%20Nov%C3%A1k%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-962266%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Manage%20policies%20%2F%20coexistence%20mode%20by%20AD%20groups%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-962266%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EResurrecting%20this%20thread%20-%20Now%20that%20Teams%20has%20been%20out%20there%20for%20a%20while%2C%20I'm%20wondering%20how%20others%20are%20managing%20their%20policies%20in%20larger%20organizations%3F%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Miroslav Novák
Contributor

Hi,

 

is there any option how to assign policies and coexistence mode to AD groups or members in group? We would like to manage coexistence mode (TeamsOnly) based on AD group but I have not found yet any option. I have found just powershell script (Grant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy) to assign to concrete user but not to AD group. Thank you for tips.

 

Mirek :)

2 Replies
Solution

Afaik No.. Its per user or tenant! But I guess you could have a script parse the members of a group with Get-ADGroupMember and do a for each loop setting the coexistance on each user in that group

 

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/skype/grant-csteamsupgradepolicy?view=skype-ps

 

@Miroslav Novák 

Resurrecting this thread - Now that Teams has been out there for a while, I'm wondering how others are managing their policies in larger organizations?  

Related Conversations
Tabs and Dark Mode
cjc2112 in Discussions on
46 Replies
Extentions Synchronization
Deleted in Discussions on
3 Replies
Stable version of Edge insider browser
HotCakeX in Discussions on
35 Replies
How to Prevent Teams from Auto-Launch
chenrylee in Microsoft Teams on
30 Replies
flashing a white screen while open new tab
Deleted in Discussions on
14 Replies
Security Community Webinars
Valon_Kolica in Security, Privacy & Compliance on
13 Replies