Home

Status with private channels

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-299627%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EStatus%20with%20private%20channels%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-299627%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI'll%20ask%20the%20obligatory%20%22what%20is%20the%20status%20with%20private%20channels%3F%22%26nbsp%3B%20Been%20waiting%20on%20this%20forever%2C%20and%20it's%20majorly%20holding%20up%20my%20migration%20from%20slack.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAlso%2C%20a%20few%20niggling%20requests%3A%20are%20there%20any%20plans%20in%20the%20works%20to%20adopt%20some%20of%20the%20other%20very%20useful%20silly%20slack%20functionality%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Ability%20to%20add%20your%20own%20emojis%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Create%20user%20groups%20which%20can%20be%26nbsp%3B%40%20mentioned%20(which%20would%20make%20my%20live%20so%20much%20easier%3F)%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-299627%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-301044%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Status%20with%20private%20channels%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-301044%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThe%20most%20requested%20user%20voice%20out%20there%20I%20think.%20Its%20going%20to%20be%20key%20for%20governance%20and%20controlling%20Teams%20sprawl%20so%20I%20imagine%20it%20would%20be%20out%20earlier%20than%20later%20in%202019%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-300957%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Status%20with%20private%20channels%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-300957%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERegarding%20private%20channels%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3EIn%20the%20works%20-%20keep%20updated%20here%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16911079-support-for-private-channels%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fmicrosoftteams.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F555103-public%2Fsuggestions%2F16911079-support-for-private-channels%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Arin Komins
Contributor

I'll ask the obligatory "what is the status with private channels?"  Been waiting on this forever, and it's majorly holding up my migration from slack.

 

Also, a few niggling requests: are there any plans in the works to adopt some of the other very useful silly slack functionality?  Ability to add your own emojis?  Create user groups which can be @ mentioned (which would make my live so much easier?)

2 Replies
The most requested user voice out there I think. Its going to be key for governance and controlling Teams sprawl so I imagine it would be out earlier than later in 2019
Related Conversations
Teams Hijacking Skype for Business Status
Chris Field in Microsoft Teams on
4 Replies
Skype for Business status issue
Iurii Koza in Skype for Business IT Pro on
2 Replies
Unified presence not working
Brad Gaspard in Microsoft Teams on
1 Replies
System wide presence status
Daniel Flath in Microsoft Teams AMA on
0 Replies