Forum Discussion
Edge on Linux
InYourHead It seems to me there are really only 3 distributions to publish to. You have Debian based, Red Hat and BSD. Even if they only do Debian and Red Hat and maybe a source to compile, everything will be covered. It seems like most people used Snapd now over Flatpak, but I'm unsure of that. I know my system can use both to install. I know I'm waiting for Edge Linux to come out so I can get off of Chrome.
Kevin_CT "It seems to me there are really only 3 distributions to publish to. You have Debian based, Red Hat and BSD. Even if they only do Debian and Red Hat and maybe a source to compile, everything will be covered. It seems like most people used Snapd now over Flatpak, but I'm unsure of that. I know my system can use both to install."
Microsoft is keeping distribution plans under wraps at this point (see MissyQ's response on the Edge on Linux: Package Formats? thread, for example) but I suspect that TheVetDev's observation in that thread ("I would assume they will be snap first since Microsoft and Canonical have such a tight relationship and code, teams, and powershell are already snaps maintained my Microsoft.") is right -- Microsoft is most likely to release a Snapd version starting out.
I'm okay with that, because Solus supports both Snapd and Flatpak. If and when Microsoft releases a Linux version, I'll test it. I have no idea whether Microsoft intends to deliver anything in deb, rpm or eopkg. I guess it doesn't make much difference, so long as Microsoft releases Snapd and Flatpak versions. Most distros support one, the other, or both.
- cacarr-pdxwebJun 19, 2020Copper Contributor
tomscharbach
I suppose I would prefer an AppImage. But ah well.
Ideally, it will end up in the AUR.- Jonathan CoffengJun 19, 2020Copper Contributor
cacarr-pdxweb+1 for AppImage or Flatpak, because snapd is kind of tied to Canonical (though I sort of understand the reasons to use this format).