Blog Post

Microsoft Security Community Blog
4 MIN READ

Authorization and Identity Governance Inside AI Agents

ashwinijwaghmare7's avatar
Feb 25, 2026

This architecture is intended for organizations building Copilot Studio agents in regulated or security‑sensitive environments.

Designing Authorization‑Aware AI Agents

Enforcing Microsoft Entra ID RBAC in Copilot Studio

As AI agents move from experimentation to enterprise execution, authorization becomes the defining line between innovation and risk.

AI agents are rapidly evolving from experimental assistants into enterprise operators—retrieving user data, triggering workflows, and invoking protected APIs. While many early implementations rely on prompt‑level instructions to control access, regulated enterprise environments require authorization to be enforced by identity systems, not language models.

This article presents a production‑ready, identity‑first architecture for building authorization‑aware AI agents using Copilot Studio, Power Automate, Microsoft Entra ID, and Microsoft Graph, ensuring every agent action executes strictly within the requesting user’s permissions.


Why Prompt‑Level Security Is Not Enough

Large Language Models interpret intent—they do not enforce policy.

Even the most carefully written prompts cannot:

  • Validate Microsoft Entra ID group or role membership
  • Reliably distinguish delegated user identity from application identity
  • Enforce deterministic access decisions
  • Produce auditable authorization outcomes

Relying on prompts for authorization introduces silent security failures, over‑privileged access, and compliance gaps—particularly in Financial Services, Healthcare, and other regulated industries.

Authorization is not a reasoning problem.

It is an identity enforcement problem.


Common Authorization Anti‑Patterns in AI Agents

The following patterns frequently appear in early AI agent implementations and should be avoided in enterprise environments:

  • Hard‑coded role or group checks embedded in prompts
  • Trusting group names passed as plain‑text parameters
  • Using application permissions for user‑initiated actions
  • Skipping verification of the user’s Entra ID identity
  • Lacking an auditable authorization decision point

These approaches may work in demos, but they do not survive security reviews, compliance audits, or real‑world misuse scenarios.


Authorization‑Aware Agent Architecture

In an authorization‑aware design, the agent never decides access.

Authorization is enforced externally, by identity‑aware workflows that sit outside the language model’s reasoning boundary.

High‑Level Flow
  1. The Copilot Studio agent receives a user request
  2. The agent passes the User Principal Name (UPN) and intended action
  3. A Power Automate flow validates permissions using Microsoft Entra ID via Microsoft Graph
  4. Only authorized requests are allowed to proceed
  5. Unauthorized requests fail fast with a deterministic outcome

Authorization‑aware Copilot Studio architecture enforces Entra ID RBAC before executing any business action.

The agent orchestrates intent.

Identity systems enforce access.


Enforcing Entra ID RBAC with Microsoft Graph

Power Automate acts as the authorization enforcement layer:

  • Resolve user identity from the supplied UPN
  • Retrieve group or role memberships using Microsoft Graph
  • Normalize and compare memberships against approved RBAC groups
  • Explicitly deny execution when authorization fails

This keeps authorization logic:

  • Centralized
  • Deterministic
  • Auditable
  • Independent of the AI model

Reference Implementation: Power Automate RBAC Enforcement Flow

The following import‑ready Power Automate cloud flow demonstrates a secure RBAC enforcement pattern for Copilot Studio agents. It validates Microsoft Entra ID group membership before allowing any business action.

Scenario

  • Trigger: User‑initiated agent action
  • Identity model: Delegated user identity
  • Input: userUPN, requestedAction
  • Outcome: Authorized or denied based on Entra ID RBAC
{
  "$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/providers/Microsoft.Logic/schemas/2016-06-01/workflowdefinition.json#",
  "contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
  "triggers": {
    "Copilot_Request": {
      "type": "Request",
      "kind": "Http",
      "inputs": {
        "schema": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "userUPN": { "type": "string" },
            "requestedAction": { "type": "string" }
          },
          "required": [ "userUPN" ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "actions": {
    "Get_User_Groups": {
      "type": "Http",
      "inputs": {
        "method": "GET",
        "uri": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/@{triggerBody()?['userUPN']}/memberOf?$select=displayName",
        "authentication": {
          "type": "ManagedServiceIdentity"
        }
      }
    },
    "Normalize_Group_Names": {
      "type": "Select",
      "inputs": {
        "from": "@body('Get_User_Groups')?['value']",
        "select": {
          "groupName": "@toLower(item()?['displayName'])"
        }
      },
      "runAfter": {
        "Get_User_Groups": [ "Succeeded" ]
      }
    },
    "Check_Authorization": {
      "type": "Condition",
      "expression": "@contains(body('Normalize_Group_Names'), 'ai-authorized-users')",
      "runAfter": {
        "Normalize_Group_Names": [ "Succeeded" ]
      },
      "actions": {
        "Authorized_Action": {
          "type": "Compose",
          "inputs": "User authorized via Entra ID RBAC"
        }
      },
      "else": {
        "actions": {
          "Access_Denied": {
            "type": "Terminate",
            "inputs": {
              "status": "Failed",
              "message": "Access denied. User not authorized via Entra ID RBAC."
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

This pattern enforces authorization outside the agent, aligns with Zero Trust principles, and creates a clear audit boundary suitable for enterprise and regulated environments.

Flow Diagram:
Agent Integrated with RBAC Authorization Flow and Sample Prompt Execution:

 


Delegated vs Application Permissions

Scenario

Recommended Permission Model

User‑initiated agent actions

Delegated permissions

Background or system automation

Application permissions

Using delegated permissions ensures agent execution remains strictly within the requesting user’s identity boundary.


Auditing and Compliance Benefits

  • Deterministic and explainable authorization decisions
  • Centralized enforcement aligned with identity governance
  • Clear audit trails for security and compliance reviews
  • Readiness for SOC, ISO, PCI, and FSI assessments

Enterprise Security Takeaways

  • Authorization belongs in Microsoft Entra ID, not prompts
  • AI agents must respect enterprise identity boundaries
  • Copilot Studio + Power Automate + Microsoft Graph enable secure‑by‑design AI agents

By treating AI agents as first‑class enterprise actors and enforcing authorization at the identity layer, organizations can scale AI adoption with confidence, trust, and compliance.

Updated Feb 25, 2026
Version 1.0
No CommentsBe the first to comment